Richard A. Elion

This retrospective observational study evaluated the clinical use and treatment outcomes in virologically suppressed people with HIV (PWH) switching to either bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) or dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens (single- and multi-tablet formulations (STR and MTR)). We analyzed electronic medical and dispensing records from Trio Health HIV Research Network for treatment-experienced PWH ≥ 18 years suppressed (viral load [VL] < 200 copies/mL) at switch to B/F/TAF, DTG STR (DTG/3TC, DTG/RPV, DTG/3TC/ABC) or most common DTG MTRs with VL at 12 months (+/-3) since switch between April 2019 and December 2024. Univariate comparisons: chi-square or t-test; characteristics associated with virologic suppression at 12 months: multivariable logistic regression [LR], controlling for age, gender, race, baseline CD4 count, regimen, and adherence (proportion days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%). Of 3141 PWH, 66% switched to B/F/TAF, 27% to DTG STR, and 7% to DTG MTRs. Baseline characteristics differed significantly between groups: B/F/TAF group had a higher proportion of males (81% vs. 67% DTG MTR) and Black individuals (40% vs. 31% DTG STR), while the DTG STR and MTR groups had higher proportions of PWH with cardiovascular disease (35% and 39% respectively vs. 32% on B/F/TAF) and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (18% and 22% respectively vs. 8% on B/F/TAF). At 12 months post switch, proportion of individuals with PDC ≥ 80% was higher in the DTG STR group (76%) compared to DTG MTR (67%) and B/F/TAF (69%) with similar virologic suppression across groups (98%, 98%, and 97% respectively). In multivariable LR, there was an association of White race, PDC ≥ 80%, and CD4 ≥ 200 cells/mm3 with greater probability of suppression at 12 months. Despite differences in baseline characteristics and regimen adherence between individuals switched to B/F/TAF, DTG STRs, and MTRs, both B/F/TAF and DTG-based regimens were associated with high rates of virologic suppression. This data strongly supports the inclusion of these simple and safe regimens as switch options in virologically suppressed PWH. Baseline differences in patient demographics and characteristics may have impacted the adherence on B/F/TAF compared to DTG STR, however virologic outcomes were preserved, demonstrating the forgiveness of B/F/TAF in populations potentially facing adherence challenges.

The advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies has dramatically transformed HCV treatment, with most recent trials demonstrating high efficacy rates (>90%) across all genotypes and special populations, including patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. The efficacy rates of HCV treatment are nearly identical between patients with HCV monofection and patients with HIV/HCV coinfection; however, there are limited studies to compare real-world efficacy with efficacy observed in clinical trials. Using a database from HIV clinics across the United States (US), we identified 432 patients with HIV/HCV coinfection who completed DAA therapy from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2017 and were assessed for efficacy. Efficacy was evaluated as sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after DAA completion; furthermore, factors associated with achieving SVR12 were identified. In this analysis, we found DAA therapies to be effective, with 94% of the patients achieving SVR12 and 6% experiencing virologic failure. Baseline variables, including older age, HCV viral load <800K IU/ML, FIB-4 score <1.45, absence of depression, diabetes, substance abuse, and use of DAA regimens without ribavirin were significant predictors of achieving SVR12. Patients with fewer comorbidities, better liver health, and lower HCV viral loads at baseline were more likely to achieve treatment success. Our results were consistent with other real-world studies, supporting the use of HCV therapy in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. We aimed to estimate the impact of different PrEP prioritization strategies among Black and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, populations most disproportionately affected by HIV. We developed an agent-based simulation to model the HIV epidemic among MSM. Individuals were assigned an HIV incidence risk index (HIRI-MSM) based on their sexual behavior. Prioritization strategies included PrEP use for individuals with HIRI-MSM ≥10 among all MSM, all Black MSM, young (≤25 years) Black MSM, Latino MSM, and young Latino MSM. We estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one HIV infection, reductions in prevalence and incidence, and subsequent infections in non-PrEP users avoided under these strategies over 5 years (2016–2020). Young Black MSM eligible for PrEP had the lowest NNT (NNT = 10) followed by all Black MSM (NNT = 33) and young Latino MSM (NNT = 35). All Latino MSM and all MSM had NNT values of 63 and 70, respectively. Secondary infection reduction with PrEP was the highest among young Latino MSM (53.2%) followed by young Black MSM (37.8%). Targeting all MSM had the greatest reduction in prevalence (14.7% versus 2.9%–3.9% in other strategies) and incidence (49.4% versus 9.4%–13.9% in other groups). Using data representative of the United States MSM population, we found that a strategy of universal PrEP use by MSM was most effective in reducing HIV prevalence and incidence of MSM. Targeted use of PrEP by Black and Latino MSM, however, especially those ≤25 years, had the greatest impact on HIV prevention.

Purpose of review This article describes the use of tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) as prevention for exposure to HIV [preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)] infection in the USA. The use of PrEP and the challenges of implementation are very instructive as other countries adopt this intervention and it becomes a fundamental part of worldwide efforts for HIV prevention and much can be learned from the first 3 years in the USA. Recent findings Randomized trials and demonstration projects have shown the benefits of PrEP for men and women who are at risk for HIV. Numerous studies have showed that the level of prevention is excellent when the drug is taken at least four times weekly, once adequate levels are obtained. However, adherence remains a critical issue as well as tailoring delivery models for specific populations. Six recent studies are discussed, that support excellent efficacy and significantly support PrEP as a means of prevention. These projects have shown high acceptance of PrEP with excellent adherence by individuals demonstrated by those at risk remaining free of HIV over extended periods of time. Summary The USA faces three significant challenges in scaling up PrEP. The first challenge in implementation in the USA is to get individuals to recognize the actual risks that their behaviors represent and to engage with providers to address these issues. The second challenge is getting a population of providers to recognize the exact same issues and offer PrEP in a compassionate, nonjudgmental fashion. The third challenge is identifying the set of providers and locations to scale-up the response in a timely, cost-effective fashion.

Background: Indicators for determining one's status on the HIV care continuum are often measured using clinical and surveillance data but do not typically assess patient perspectives. We assessed patient-reported care status along the care continuum and whether it differed from medical records and surveillance data. Methods: Between June 2013 and October 2014, a convenience sample of clinic-attending HIV-infected persons was surveyed regarding care-seeking behaviors and self-perceived status along the care continuum. Participant responses were matched to DC Department of Health surveillance data and clinic records. Participants' care patterns were classified using Health Resources Services Administration–defined care status: in care (IC), sporadic care (SC), or out of care (OOC). Semistructured qualitative interviews were analyzed using an open coding process to elucidate relevant themes regarding participants' perceptions of engagement in care. Results: Of 169 participants, most were male participants (64%) and black (72%), with a mean age of 50.7 years. Using self-reported visit patterns, 115 participants (68%) were consistent with being IC, 33 (20%) SC, and 21 (12%) OOC. Among OOC participants, 52% perceived themselves to be fully engaged in HIV care. In the previous year, among OOC participants, 71% reported having a non–HIV-related medical visit and 90% reported current antiretroviral use. Qualitatively, most SC and OOC persons did not see their HIV providers regularly because they felt healthy. Conclusions: Participants' perceptions of HIV care engagement differed from actual care receipt as measured by surveillance and clinical records. Measures of care engagement may need to be reconsidered as persons not receiving regular HIV care maybe accessing other health care and HIV medications elsewhere.