Bhanu Rekapalli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Bhanu Rekapalli has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alison Buchan
Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee
1 shared publication - Andy Perkins
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA
1 shared publication - Barry D. Bruce
Department of Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA; Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA
1 shared publication - Bindu Nanduri
Mississippi State University
1 shared publication - Carole L. Cramer
Arkansas Biosciences Institute at Arkansas State University-Jonesboro, State University, Arkansas, USA
1 shared publication - Donald C. Wunsch
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 February 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in BioData Mining
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-5
Big data - a 21st century science Maginot Line? No-boundary thinking: shifting from the big data paradigm
Whether your interests lie in scientific arenas, the corporate world, or in government, you have certainly heard the praises of big data: Big data will give you new insights, allow you to become more efficient, and/or will solve your problems. While big data has had some outstanding successes, many are now beginning to see that it is not the Silver Bullet that it has been touted to be. Here our main concern is the overall impact of big data; the current manifestation of big data is constructing a Maginot Line in science in the 21st century. Big data is not “lots of data” as a phenomena anymore; The big data paradigm is putting the spirit of the Maginot Line into lots of data. Big data overall is disconnecting researchers and science challenges. We propose No-Boundary Thinking (NBT), applying no-boundary thinking in problem defining to address science challenges.
- 6 February 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in BioData Mining
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-5
Open AccessBig data - a 21st century science Maginot Line? No-boundary thinking: shifting from the big data paradigm
Whether your interests lie in scientific arenas, the corporate world, or in government, you have certainly heard the praises of big data: Big data will give you new insights, allow you to become more efficient, and/or will solve your problems. While big data has had some outstanding successes, many are now beginning to see that it is not the Silver Bullet that it has been touted to be. Here our main concern is the overall impact of big data; the current manifestation of big data is constructing a Maginot Line in science in the 21st century. Big data is not “lots of data” as a phenomena anymore; The big data paradigm is putting the spirit of the Maginot Line into lots of data. Big data overall is disconnecting researchers and science challenges. We propose No-Boundary Thinking (NBT), applying no-boundary thinking in problem defining to address science challenges.
- Open Access
- 16 November 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 634
Dynamics of domain coverage of the protein sequence universe
Background: The currently known protein sequence space consists of millions of sequences in public databases and is rapidly expanding. Assigning sequences to families leads to a better understanding of protein function and the nature of the protein universe. However, a large portion of the current protein space remains unassigned and is referred to as its “dark matter”. Results: Here we suggest that true size of “dark matter” is much larger than stated by current definitions. We propose an approach to reducing the size of “dark matter” by identifying and subtracting regions in protein sequences that are not likely to contain any domain. Conclusions: Recent improvements in computational domain modeling result in a decrease, albeit slowly, in the relative size of “dark matter”; however, its absolute size increases substantially with the growth of sequence data.
- 16 November 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 13 (1) , 634
Open AccessDynamics of domain coverage of the protein sequence universe
Background: The currently known protein sequence space consists of millions of sequences in public databases and is rapidly expanding. Assigning sequences to families leads to a better understanding of protein function and the nature of the protein universe. However, a large portion of the current protein space remains unassigned and is referred to as its “dark matter”. Results: Here we suggest that true size of “dark matter” is much larger than stated by current definitions. We propose an approach to reducing the size of “dark matter” by identifying and subtracting regions in protein sequences that are not likely to contain any domain. Conclusions: Recent improvements in computational domain modeling result in a decrease, albeit slowly, in the relative size of “dark matter”; however, its absolute size increases substantially with the growth of sequence data.