Knut Magne Kolstadbråten

Background: Trauma hemorrhage induces a coagulopathy with a high associated mortality rate. The Implementing Treatment Algorithms for the Correction of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy (ITACTIC) randomized trial tested two goal-directed treatment algorithms for coagulation management: one guided by conventional coagulation tests and one by viscoelastic hemostatic assays (viscoelastic). The lack of a difference in 28-day mortality led the authors to hypothesize that coagulopathic patients received insufficient treatment to correct coagulopathy. Methods: During ITACTIC, two sites were coenrolling patients into an ongoing prospective observational study, which included serial blood sampling at the same intervals as in ITACTIC. The subgroup in both studies had conventional and viscoelastic test results for each patient available for analysis. A goal-directed treatment was defined as one triggered by an ITACTIC algorithm. Coagulopathy was defined as rotational thromboelastometry EXTEM A5 less than 40 mm. The primary outcome was correction of coagulopathy by the 12th unit of erythrocyte transfusion during resuscitation. Results: Full viscoelastic and conventional coagulation test results were available for 133 patients. Of these patients, 71% were coagulopathic on admission, and 16% developed a coagulopathy during resuscitation. ITACTIC viscoelastic hemostatic assay group patients were more likely to receive goal-directed treatment than the standard group (76% vs. 47%; odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.64 to 8.49; P = 0.002). However, only 54% of patients received goal-directed treatment, and only 20% corrected their coagulopathy (vs. 0% with empiric treatment alone; not significant). Median time to first goal-directed treatment was 68 (53 to 88) min for viscoelastic and 110 (77 to 123) min for standard (P = 0.005). Conclusions: In ITACTIC, many bleeding trauma patients did not receive an indicated goal-directed treatment. Interventions arrived late during resuscitation and were only partially effective at correcting coagulopathy. Editor’s Perspective: What We Already Know about This Topic: What This Article Tells Us That Is New:

Introduction: Data on the incidence of a hypercoagulable state in trauma, as measured by thromboelastometry (ROTEM), is limited and the prognostic value of hypercoagulability after trauma on outcome is unclear. We aimed to determine the incidence of hypercoagulability after trauma, and to assess whether early hypercoagulability has prognostic value on the occurrence of multiple organ failure (MOF) and mortality. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study in trauma patients who met the highest trauma level team activation. Hypercoagulability was defined as a G value of ≥11.7 dynes/cm² and hypocoagulability as a G value of 2. ROTEM was performed on admission and 24 hours later. Results: A total of 1,010 patients were enrolled and 948 patients were analyzed. Median age was 38 (interquartile range (IQR) 26 to 53), 77% were male and median injury severity score was 13 (IQR 8 to 25). On admission, 7% of the patients were hypercoagulable and 8% were hypocoagulable. Altogether, 10% of patients showed hypercoagulability within the first 24 hours of trauma. Hypocoagulability, but not hypercoagulability, was associated with higher sequential organ failure assessment scores, indicating more severe MOF. Mortality in patients with hypercoagulability was 0%, compared to 7% in normocoagulable and 24% in hypocoagulable patients (P G were predictors for occurrence of MOF and mortality. Conclusions: The incidence of a hypercoagulable state after trauma is 10% up to 24 hours after admission, which is broadly comparable to the rate of hypocoagulability. Further work in larger studies should define the clinical consequences of identifying hypercoagulability and a possible role for very early, targeted use of anticoagulants.