Silvia Bombelli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Silvia Bombelli has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Giorgio Cattoretti
Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Universitá di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Michigan, Italy
2 shared publications - Maddalena Maria Bolognesi
Istituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare – CNR, Milan, Italy
2 shared publications - Roberto A. Peregon
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
2 shared publications - Adriana Albini
Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 20141 Milan, Italy
1 shared publication - Antonino Bruno
Laboratory of Immunology and General Pathology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
1 shared publication - Arnie Purushotham
School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
PKHhigh/CD133+/CD24− Renal Stem-Like Cells Isolated from Human Nephrospheres Exhibit In Vitro Multipotency
The mechanism upon which human kidneys undergo regeneration is debated, though different lineage-tracing mouse models have tried to explain the cellular types and the mechanisms involved. Different sources of human renal progenitors have been proposed, but it is difficult to argue whether these populations have the same capacities that have been described in mice. Using the nephrosphere (NS) model, we isolated the quiescent population of adult human renal stem-like PKHhigh/CD133+/CD24− cells (RSC). The aim of this study was to deepen the RSC in vitro multipotency capacity. RSC, not expressing endothelial markers, generated secondary nephrospheres containing CD31+/vWf+ cells and cytokeratin positive cells, indicating the coexistence of endothelial and epithelial commitment. RSC cultured on decellularized human renal scaffolds generated endothelial structures together with the proximal and distal tubular structures. CD31+ endothelial committed progenitors sorted from nephrospheres generated spheroids with endothelial-like sprouts in Matrigel. We also demonstrated the double commitment toward endothelial and epithelial lineages of single RSC. The ability of the plastic RSC population to recapitulate the development of tubular epithelial and endothelial renal lineages makes these cells a good tool for the creation of organoids with translational relevance for studying the parenchymal and endothelial cell interactions and developing new therapeutic strategies.
Open AccessPKHhigh/CD133+/CD24− Renal Stem-Like Cells Isolated from Human Nephrospheres Exhibit In Vitro Multipotency
The mechanism upon which human kidneys undergo regeneration is debated, though different lineage-tracing mouse models have tried to explain the cellular types and the mechanisms involved. Different sources of human renal progenitors have been proposed, but it is difficult to argue whether these populations have the same capacities that have been described in mice. Using the nephrosphere (NS) model, we isolated the quiescent population of adult human renal stem-like PKHhigh/CD133+/CD24− cells (RSC). The aim of this study was to deepen the RSC in vitro multipotency capacity. RSC, not expressing endothelial markers, generated secondary nephrospheres containing CD31+/vWf+ cells and cytokeratin positive cells, indicating the coexistence of endothelial and epithelial commitment. RSC cultured on decellularized human renal scaffolds generated endothelial structures together with the proximal and distal tubular structures. CD31+ endothelial committed progenitors sorted from nephrospheres generated spheroids with endothelial-like sprouts in Matrigel. We also demonstrated the double commitment toward endothelial and epithelial lineages of single RSC. The ability of the plastic RSC population to recapitulate the development of tubular epithelial and endothelial renal lineages makes these cells a good tool for the creation of organoids with translational relevance for studying the parenchymal and endothelial cell interactions and developing new therapeutic strategies.
- Open Access
NOT ALL ANTIBODIES HAVE BEEN CREATED EQUAL: Antibodies validated for routinely processed tissue seldom apply to frozen tissue sections
A customized context-dependent validation of antibodies for the prospective use, rather than a general stamp of validity, is required for reproducibility and data validity, besides the need of standardized reagents. In-situ antibody staining is a technique broadly used in experimental settings and human diagnostic practice. The first typically, but not exclusively uses lightly fixed material (cell smears, frozen sections), the second, routinely processed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Differently from techniques based on tissue extraction, there is little awareness of the context-dependent constraints inherent with either type of in situ staining except that antigen masking associated with routine tissue processing limits the range of useful antibodies. We applied a panel of 126 antibodies validated for FFPE to lightly fixed (acetone, formalin) frozen sections and found that less than 30% performed conservatively with all fixations, 35% preferred one fixation over another, 13% gave non-specific staining, 23% did not stain at all. Individual antibody variegation of the paratope fitness for the differentially fixed antigen may be the cause. Re-validation of established antibody panels is required when applied to sections whose fixation and processing is different from the tissue where they have been initially validated.
Open AccessNOT ALL ANTIBODIES HAVE BEEN CREATED EQUAL: Antibodies validated for routinely processed tissue seldom apply to frozen tissue sections
A customized context-dependent validation of antibodies for the prospective use, rather than a general stamp of validity, is required for reproducibility and data validity, besides the need of standardized reagents. In-situ antibody staining is a technique broadly used in experimental settings and human diagnostic practice. The first typically, but not exclusively uses lightly fixed material (cell smears, frozen sections), the second, routinely processed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Differently from techniques based on tissue extraction, there is little awareness of the context-dependent constraints inherent with either type of in situ staining except that antigen masking associated with routine tissue processing limits the range of useful antibodies. We applied a panel of 126 antibodies validated for FFPE to lightly fixed (acetone, formalin) frozen sections and found that less than 30% performed conservatively with all fixations, 35% preferred one fixation over another, 13% gave non-specific staining, 23% did not stain at all. Individual antibody variegation of the paratope fitness for the differentially fixed antigen may be the cause. Re-validation of established antibody panels is required when applied to sections whose fixation and processing is different from the tissue where they have been initially validated.
- Open Access
- 27 May 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research
- Vol. 16 (3) , R52
Aldehyde dehydrogenase and estrogen receptor define a hierarchy of cellular differentiation in the normal human mammary epithelium
Introduction: Although estrogen and progesterone play a key role in normal mammary development and in breast cancer, the potential for proliferation and lineage differentiation as well as origin of cells that express the estrogen receptor (ER) in normal breast epithelium are not known. Some evidence suggests that normal human mammary stem/progenitor cells are ER–, but the identity of these cells and the cellular hierarchy of breast epithelium are still subjects of controversy. It is likely that elucidation of these aspects will bring insight into the cellular origin of breast cancer subtypes. Methods: We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting of primary human mammary epithelial cells along with in vitro and in vivo functional assays to examine the hierarchic relation between cells with aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymatic activity (ALDH+ cells) and ER+ cells in the normal human breast epithelium. We assessed the proliferation and lineage differentiation potential of these cells in vitro and in vivo. A gene reporter assay was used to separate live ER+ and ER– mammary epithelial cells. With shRNA-mediated knockdown, we investigated the role of ALDH isoforms in the functionality of mammary epithelial progenitor cells. Results: We describe a cellular hierarchy in the normal human mammary gland in which ER–/ALDH+ cells with functional properties of stem/progenitor cells generate ER+ progenitor cells, which in turn give rise to cells of luminal lineage. We show that the ALDH1A1 isoform, through its function in the retinoic acid metabolism, affects the proliferation and/or early differentiation of stem/progenitor cells and is important for branching morphogenesis. Conclusions: This study presents direct evidence that ER+ cells are generated by ER–/ALDH+ stem/progenitor cells. We also show that ER+ cells are able to generate cell progeny of luminal lineage in vitro and in vivo. Loss of ALDH1A1 function impairs this process, as well as branching morphogenesis and clonogenicity in suspension culture. This latter effect is reversed by treatment with retinoic acid.
- 27 May 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research
- Vol. 16 (3) , R52
Open AccessAldehyde dehydrogenase and estrogen receptor define a hierarchy of cellular differentiation in the normal human mammary epithelium
Introduction: Although estrogen and progesterone play a key role in normal mammary development and in breast cancer, the potential for proliferation and lineage differentiation as well as origin of cells that express the estrogen receptor (ER) in normal breast epithelium are not known. Some evidence suggests that normal human mammary stem/progenitor cells are ER–, but the identity of these cells and the cellular hierarchy of breast epithelium are still subjects of controversy. It is likely that elucidation of these aspects will bring insight into the cellular origin of breast cancer subtypes. Methods: We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting of primary human mammary epithelial cells along with in vitro and in vivo functional assays to examine the hierarchic relation between cells with aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymatic activity (ALDH+ cells) and ER+ cells in the normal human breast epithelium. We assessed the proliferation and lineage differentiation potential of these cells in vitro and in vivo. A gene reporter assay was used to separate live ER+ and ER– mammary epithelial cells. With shRNA-mediated knockdown, we investigated the role of ALDH isoforms in the functionality of mammary epithelial progenitor cells. Results: We describe a cellular hierarchy in the normal human mammary gland in which ER–/ALDH+ cells with functional properties of stem/progenitor cells generate ER+ progenitor cells, which in turn give rise to cells of luminal lineage. We show that the ALDH1A1 isoform, through its function in the retinoic acid metabolism, affects the proliferation and/or early differentiation of stem/progenitor cells and is important for branching morphogenesis. Conclusions: This study presents direct evidence that ER+ cells are generated by ER–/ALDH+ stem/progenitor cells. We also show that ER+ cells are able to generate cell progeny of luminal lineage in vitro and in vivo. Loss of ALDH1A1 function impairs this process, as well as branching morphogenesis and clonogenicity in suspension culture. This latter effect is reversed by treatment with retinoic acid.