Neil M. Bressler

Importance: Determining spectacle-corrected visual acuity (VA) is essential when managing many ophthalmic diseases. If artificial intelligence (AI) evaluations of macular images estimated this VA from a fundus image, AI might provide spectacle-corrected VA without technician costs, reduce visit time, or facilitate home monitoring of VA from fundus images obtained outside of the clinic.Objective: To estimate spectacle-corrected VA measured on a standard eye chart among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in clinical practice settings using previously validated AI algorithms evaluating best-corrected VA from fundus photographs in eyes with DME.Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional evaluation of deidentified fundus photographs matched to spectacle-corrected VA determined by technicians on eye charts among patients with a history of DME based on optical coherence tomography and at least 2 visits within 1 to 6 months of each other at a university-based clinic between January 2014 and December 2022. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to October 2024.Exposure: Previously validated AI algorithm evaluation of fundus photographs.Main Outcomes and Measures: AI-determined VA mean absolute error (MAE) compared with actual spectacle-corrected VA.Results: Among 141 patients, the mean (SD) age was 63 (13) years, 71 (50%) were male, 2 (1%) were Asian, 42 (30%) were Black or African American, and 88 (63%) were White. Among 282 eyes at visit 1, 66 had nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DME, 38 had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and DME, 101 had NPDR and no DME, and 77 had PDR and no DME. Among 564 images (282 eyes) at both initial and follow-up visits, MAE (SD) among eyes with NPDR, with or without center-involved DME (CI-DME), was 1.16 (1.00) lines on the eye chart for VA between 20/10 and 20/20 (67 images), and 1.44 (1.15) lines for between VA 20/25 and 20/80 (231 images). MAE (SD) among eyes with PDR, with or without CI-DME, was 1.92 (1.08) lines for VA between 20/10 and 20/20 (50 images), and 1.42 (0.97) lines for spectacle-corrected VA between 20/25 and 20/80 (150 images). Only 65 images had VA 20/100 or worse, precluding meaningful analyses.Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, AI evaluation of fundus photographs among patients with DME and VA 20/80 or better estimated spectacle-corrected VA within approximately 1 to 1.5 lines of actual spectacle-corrected VA. These results support use of AI evaluation of fundus photographs to determine spectacle-corrected VA among patients with DME globally, beyond ophthalmology offices.

Purpose: To derive estimates of clinically meaningful change (improvement) on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Methods: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of data from the RIDE/RISE (NCT00473382/NCT00473330) clinical trials of ranibizumab for DME, the NEI VFQ-25 was completed at baseline and six, 12, 18, and 24 months. Anchor-based (>5-, >10-, and >15-letter gain in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA]) and distribution-based estimates were calculated. Subgroup analyses included outcomes when the study eye was the better- or worse-seeing eye. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the trials (RIDE, N = 382; RISE, N = 377). Anchor-based estimates of clinically meaningful improvement in composite scores (for >15-letter gain in BCVA) were 3.78 and 2.23 for RIDE and RISE, respectively. Estimates appeared similar for most subscales: near activities (4.11 and 3.31), distance activities (3.53 and 3.74), driving difficulties (5.15 and 3.15), and vision-specific dependency (4.70 and 1.83). Supportive distribution-based meaningful change composite score estimates also were similar between RIDE and RISE for values based on 0.5 standard deviation (9.85 and 9.70, respectively) or standard error of the mean (5.10 and 4.82, respectively). Conclusions: These analyses suggest improvement of three to five points on the NEI VFQ-25 composite score and four individual subscales as clinically meaningful in patients with DME. Translational Relevance: This analysis supports considering these thresholds when assessing the clinical risk-benefit of DME treatment from the patient perspective using the NEI VFQ-25.

In Reply I thank Faust and coauthors for their important clarification to the referenced Editor’s Note. I agree with their statement, and the Editor’s

The Patient Page published online today in JAMA provides safety recommendations for viewing the next total solar eclipse, which will cross major US cities on Mo

Importance: Monitoring for and reporting potential cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in clinical practice despite limited occurrences in clinical trials, including experiences with relatively new intravitreal agents, such as brolucizumab, pegcetacoplan, or faricimab, helps balance potential benefits and risks of these agents.Objective: To provide descriptions of 3 initially culture-negative cases of acute, severe, posterior-segment IOI events occurring within the same month following intravitreal faricimab injections at a single institution.Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series, 3 patients manifesting acute, severe IOI following intravitreal injection of faricimab were identified between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023.Exposure: Faricimab, 6 mg (0.05 mL of 120 mg/mL solution), for neovascular age-related macular degeneration among patients previously treated with aflibercept; 1 patient also had prior exposure to bevacizumab.Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity, vitreous taps for bacterial or fungal cultures, and retinal imaging.Results: All 3 patients received intravitreal faricimab injections between September 20 and October 20, 2023, from 2 different lot numbers (expiration dates, July 2025) at 3 locations of 1 institution among 3 of 19 retina physicians. Visual acuities with correction were 20/63 OS for patient 1, 20/40 OD for patient 2, and 20/20 OS for patient 3 prior to injection. All 3 patients developed acute, severe inflammation involving the anterior and posterior segment within 3 to 4 days after injection, with visual acuities of hand motion OS, counting fingers OD, and hand motion OS, respectively. Two patients were continuing faricimab treatment while 1 patient was initiating faricimab treatment. All received intravitreal ceftazidime, 2.2 mg/0.1 mL, and vancomycin, 1 mg/0.1 mL, immediately following vitreous taps. All vitreous tap culture results were negative. One patient underwent vitrectomy 1 day following presentation. Intraoperative vitreous culture grew 1 colony of Staphylococcus epidermidis, judged a likely contaminant by infectious disease specialists. All symptoms resolved within 1 month; visual acuities with correction were 20/100 OS for patient 1, 20/50 OD for patient 2, and 20/30 OS for patient 3.Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series, 3 patients with acute, severe IOI within 1 month at 3 different locations among 3 ophthalmologists of 1 institution following intravitreal faricimab could represent some unknown storage or handling problem. However, this cluster suggests the continued need for vigilance to detect and report such cases following regulatory approval.

In 2014, approximately 19.8 million individuals in the United States 40 years or older had diabetes.¹ Among these individuals, about 14.3 million had diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (including absence of diabetic macular edema [DME]), 4.7 million had diabetic retinopathy without DME, and approximately 746 000 had DME.¹ Extrapolating these numbers to the estimated 396 million individuals 40 years or older with diabetes worldwide in 2019² suggests that 381.8 million have diabetic retinopathy without DME and 14.2 million have DME.