Estela Cristina Carneseca
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Estela Cristina Carneseca has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva
Barretos Cancer Hospital
1 shared publication - Carlos Eduardo Paiva
Barretos Cancer Hospital
1 shared publication - Cristiano de Pádua Souza
Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
1 shared publication - Eliane Marçon Barroso
Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Center of the Barretos Educational Foundation (UNIFEB), Barretos 14783-226, Brazil
1 shared publication - Felipe Thomé dos Santos
Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo CEP 14784-400, Brazil
1 shared publication - Rossana Verónica Mendoza López
Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 8
A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review
Patient-reported outcome validation needs to achieve validity and reliability standards. Among reliability analysis parameters, test-retest reliability is an important psychometric property. Retested patients must be in a clinically stable condition. This is particularly problematic in palliative care (PC) settings because advanced cancer patients are prone to a faster rate of clinical deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods by which multi-symptom and health-related qualities of life (HRQoL) based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been validated in oncological PC settings with regards to test-retest reliability.
- 21 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 8
Open AccessA critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review
Patient-reported outcome validation needs to achieve validity and reliability standards. Among reliability analysis parameters, test-retest reliability is an important psychometric property. Retested patients must be in a clinically stable condition. This is particularly problematic in palliative care (PC) settings because advanced cancer patients are prone to a faster rate of clinical deterioration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods by which multi-symptom and health-related qualities of life (HRQoL) based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been validated in oncological PC settings with regards to test-retest reliability.