KSKirstine Lærum Sibilitz

Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The Effect of Peer-Mentor Support for Older Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease—A 24-Week Randomized Controlled Trial

    by Maria Pedersen, Dorthe Overgaard, Takyiwa Msc Boateng, Birgitte Bennich, Anne Marie Beck, Ingelise Andersen, Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz, Isabelle Pascale Mairey, Lau Caspar Thygesen, Rikke Agnete Petersen

    Background: The positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are well established; however, among older and vulnerable patients, nonattendance and dropout are prevalent problems. Aim: The objective of this study is to explore if a 24-week peer-mentor intervention increases initial and long-term CR attendance. Secondary aims are whether peer-mentor intervention improves lifestyle (diet and physical activity) and psychological outcomes (self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life) among older vulnerable patients with ischemic heart disease. Methods: The study was designed as a 2-arm, single-center, parallel, 24-week, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with follow-up at 12 and 24 weeks. Patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either the peer-mentor intervention (in addition to standard CR) or standard CR along (control arm). Results: Between August 2021 and March 2023, 117 older, vulnerable patients were enrolled and randomized (59 randomized to peer-mentor intervention and 58 to usual care). The peer-mentor intervention significantly increased CR attendance. This applies to both initial participation in 1 CR session of physical training or dietary advice (78.0% vs 58.6%; P = .03), and long-term attendance in ≥50% dietary advice sessions (50.8% vs 27.6%; P = .01) and completed ≥50% (64.4% vs 41.4% P = .01) or ≥75% of the physical training sessions (59.3% vs 37.9%; P = .02). The study found no statistically significant effect on secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Low CR attendance is a well-known problem, especially among older, vulnerable patients; however, we tested a low-cost, peer-mentor intervention that significantly increased both initial CR participation and long-term attendance in CR sessions in this group of patients.


  • Open Access

    Patient experiences of recovery after heart valve replacement: suffering weakness, struggling to resume normality

    by Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Birthe D Pedersen, Katrine Haase, Kirstine Lærum Sibilitz

    Heart valve disease is becoming a public health problem due to increasing life expectancy and new treatment methods. Patients are at risk of developing depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder after heart valve surgery. To better plan proper care, describing and understanding patients’ perception of recovery after heart valve replacement is essential. The objective was to describe the experience of recovery at home after heart valve replacement.