Stephanie C Casey
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Stephanie C Casey has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ana M. Soto
Department of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1 shared publication - Anders Juul
Department of Growth and Reproduction Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
1 shared publication - Andreas Kortenkamp
Brunel University London, Centre for Pollution Research and Policy, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
1 shared publication - Anna-Maria Andersson
Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication - Anne Marie Vinggaard
National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
1 shared publication - Bruce Blumberg
Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, 92697-2300
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 August 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Health
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-4
Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors
The “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors regarding proposed European Union endocrine disrupter regulations ignores scientific evidence and well-established principles of chemical risk assessment. In this commentary, endocrine disrupter experts express their concerns about a recently published, and is in our considered opinion inaccurate and factually incorrect, editorial that has appeared in several journals in toxicology. Some of the shortcomings of the editorial are discussed in detail. We call for a better founded scientific debate which may help to overcome a polarisation of views detrimental to reaching a consensus about scientific foundations for endocrine disrupter regulation in the EU.
- 27 August 2013
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Health
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-4
Open AccessScience and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors
The “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors regarding proposed European Union endocrine disrupter regulations ignores scientific evidence and well-established principles of chemical risk assessment. In this commentary, endocrine disrupter experts express their concerns about a recently published, and is in our considered opinion inaccurate and factually incorrect, editorial that has appeared in several journals in toxicology. Some of the shortcomings of the editorial are discussed in detail. We call for a better founded scientific debate which may help to overcome a polarisation of views detrimental to reaching a consensus about scientific foundations for endocrine disrupter regulation in the EU.