CPCheng-Hong Peng

Cheng-Hong Peng

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Cheng-Hong Peng has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Bai-Yong Shen

    Department of General Surgery, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China

    1 shared publication
  • Baiyong Shen

    Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Department of General Surgery Shanghai China

    1 shared publication
  • Huan Chen

    Peking University,people's Hospital, Beijing, CHN

    1 shared publication
  • Kun Cheng

    Department of General Surgery, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

    1 shared publication
  • Kun Cheng

    Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    1 shared publication
  • Li-Ma Na

    Department of endocrinology, The First Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, 1, Liyushan Road, Urumqi 830000, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Middle-preserving pancreatectomy: report of two cases and review of the literature

    by Kun Cheng, Bai-Yong Shen, Cheng-Hong Peng, Li-Ma Na, Dong-Feng Cheng

    Background: Middle-preserving pancreatectomy (MPP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure which has recently been sporadically reported for the treatment of multicentric periampullary-pancreatic lesions. However, a comprehensive recognition of this procedure has not been clearly elucidated. Case presentation: We herein report two patients undergoing MPP due to synchronous multicentric pancreatic neoplasm. Patient one was a 24-year-old woman with a multicentric solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and patient two was a 36-year-old woman with a multicentric serous cystic neoplasm (SCN). Simultaneous atypical pancreaticoduodenectomy and atypical left pancreatectomy were performed in patient one; simultaneous standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and atypical left pancreatectomy with spleen preservation were performed in patient two. Approximately 6 cm and 5 cm segments of the middle portion of the pancreas were preserved, respectively. At follow-up at 36 months and 6 months respectively, patient one had developed diabetes and malabsorption requiring dietary control, exercise and pancreatic enzyme supplement whereas patient two showed normal fasting blood glucose without diarrhea. Both patients were disease-free and in good nutritional condition. We reviewed twenty cases of MPP that were previously reported in the literature. Patient characteristics, surgical techniques and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Conclusion: MPP is mainly beneficial for multicentric noninvasive periampullary-pancreatic lesions. However, for multicentric periampullary-pancreatic lesions involving even primary invasive cancers, as long as the invasive cancers affect only one side of the pancreas (proximal or distal), MPP could serve as a rational choice in well-selected patients.


  • Initial experiences in robot‐assisted middle pancreatectomy

    by Kun Cheng, Baiyong Shen, Chenghong Peng, Xiaxing Deng, Shudong Hu