Val Rose
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Val Rose has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Annette Weavers
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
3 shared publications - Debra Bick
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
3 shared publications - Julie Wray
The University of Salford, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Manchester, UK
3 shared publications - Sarah Beake
Kings College, London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, London, UK
3 shared publications - Trevor Murrells
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 12 (1) , 41
Revising acute care systems and processes to improve breastfeeding and maternal postnatal health: a pre and post intervention study in one English maternity unit
Most women in the UK give birth in a hospital labour ward, following which they are transferred to a postnatal ward and discharged home within 24 to 48 hours of the birth. Despite policy and guideline recommendations to support planned, effective postnatal care, national surveys of women’s views of maternity care have consistently found in-patient postnatal care, including support for breastfeeding, is poorly rated.
- 6 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 12 (1) , 41
Open AccessRevising acute care systems and processes to improve breastfeeding and maternal postnatal health: a pre and post intervention study in one English maternity unit
Most women in the UK give birth in a hospital labour ward, following which they are transferred to a postnatal ward and discharged home within 24 to 48 hours of the birth. Despite policy and guideline recommendations to support planned, effective postnatal care, national surveys of women’s views of maternity care have consistently found in-patient postnatal care, including support for breastfeeding, is poorly rated.
- Open Access
- 1 November 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , 293
Improving inpatient postnatal services: midwives views and perspectives of engagement in a quality improvement initiative
Despite major policy initiatives in the United Kingdom to enhance women's experiences of maternity care, improving in-patient postnatal care remains a low priority, although it is an aspect of care consistently rated as poor by women. As part of a systems and process approach to improving care at one maternity unit in the South of England, the views and perspectives of midwives responsible for implementing change were sought.
- 1 November 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 11 (1) , 293
Open AccessImproving inpatient postnatal services: midwives views and perspectives of engagement in a quality improvement initiative
Despite major policy initiatives in the United Kingdom to enhance women's experiences of maternity care, improving in-patient postnatal care remains a low priority, although it is an aspect of care consistently rated as poor by women. As part of a systems and process approach to improving care at one maternity unit in the South of England, the views and perspectives of midwives responsible for implementing change were sought.
- Open Access
- 27 October 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 10 (1) , 70
A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of women receiving in-patient postnatal care in one English maternity unit
Background: Studies consistently highlight in-patient postnatal care as the area of maternity care women are least satisfied with. As part of a quality improvement study to promote a continuum of care from the birthing room to discharge home from hospital, we explored women's expectations and experiences of current in-patient care. Methods: For this part of the study, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using content analyses to identify issues and concepts. Women were recruited from two postnatal wards in one large maternity unit in the South of England, with around 6,000 births a year. Results: Twenty women, who had a vaginal or caesarean birth, were interviewed on the postnatal ward. Identified themes included; the impact of the ward environment; the impact of the attitude of staff; quality and level of support for breastfeeding; unmet information needs; and women's low expectations of hospital based postnatal care. Findings informed revision to the content and planning of in-patient postnatal care, results of which will be reported elsewhere. Conclusions: Women's responses highlighted several areas where changes could be implemented. Staff should be aware that how they inter-act with women could make a difference to care as a positive or negative experience. The lack of support and inconsistent advice on breastfeeding highlights that units need to consider how individual staff communicate information to women. Units need to address how and when information on practical aspects of infant care is provided if women and their partners are to feel confident on the woman's transfer home from hospital.
- 27 October 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 10 (1) , 70
Open AccessA qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of women receiving in-patient postnatal care in one English maternity unit
Background: Studies consistently highlight in-patient postnatal care as the area of maternity care women are least satisfied with. As part of a quality improvement study to promote a continuum of care from the birthing room to discharge home from hospital, we explored women's expectations and experiences of current in-patient care. Methods: For this part of the study, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analysed using content analyses to identify issues and concepts. Women were recruited from two postnatal wards in one large maternity unit in the South of England, with around 6,000 births a year. Results: Twenty women, who had a vaginal or caesarean birth, were interviewed on the postnatal ward. Identified themes included; the impact of the ward environment; the impact of the attitude of staff; quality and level of support for breastfeeding; unmet information needs; and women's low expectations of hospital based postnatal care. Findings informed revision to the content and planning of in-patient postnatal care, results of which will be reported elsewhere. Conclusions: Women's responses highlighted several areas where changes could be implemented. Staff should be aware that how they inter-act with women could make a difference to care as a positive or negative experience. The lack of support and inconsistent advice on breastfeeding highlights that units need to consider how individual staff communicate information to women. Units need to address how and when information on practical aspects of infant care is provided if women and their partners are to feel confident on the woman's transfer home from hospital.