RLRobert Lindeman

Robert Lindeman

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Robert Lindeman has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Associations between early-life growth pattern and body size and follicular lymphoma risk and survival: a family-based case-control study

    by Michael K. Odutola, Marina T. van Leeuwen, Jennifer Turner, Fiona Bruinsma, John F. Seymour, H. Miles Prince, Samuel T. Milliken, Mark Hertzberg, Judith Trotman, Stephen S. Opat, et al.


  • Open Access

    Impact on learning of an e-learning module on leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial

    by Yuri Morgulis, Rakesh K Kumar, Robert Lindeman, Gary M Velan

    Background: e-learning resources may be beneficial for complex or conceptually difficult topics. Leukaemia is one such topic, yet there are no reports on the efficacy of e-learning for leukaemia. This study compared the learning impact on senior medical students of a purpose-built e-learning module on leukaemia, compared with existing online resources. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was performed utilising volunteer senior medical students. Participants were randomly allocated to Study and Control groups. Following a pre-test on leukaemia administered to both groups, the Study group was provided with access to the new e-learning module, while the Control group was directed to existing online resources. A post-test and an evaluation questionnaire were administered to both groups at the end of the trial period. Results: Study and Control groups were equivalent in gender distribution, mean academic ability, pre-test performance and time studying leukaemia during the trial. The Study group performed significantly better than the Control group in the post-test, in which the group to which the students had been allocated was the only significant predictor of performance. The Study group’s evaluation of the module was overwhelmingly positive. Conclusions: A targeted e-learning module on leukaemia had a significant effect on learning in this cohort, compared with existing online resources. We believe that the interactivity, dialogic feedback and integration with the curriculum offered by the e-learning module contributed to its impact. This has implications for e-learning design in medicine and other disciplines.