Robert Lindeman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Robert Lindeman has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Campbell Tiley
Gosford Hospital and The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
1 shared publication - Claire Melissa Vajdic
Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
1 shared publication - Craig R. Underhill
Albury-Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury-Wodonga, Australia
1 shared publication - Emma Verner
Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, Australia
1 shared publication - Fernando Roncolato
St. George Hospital, Kogarah and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
1 shared publication - Fiona Bruinsma
Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Epidemiology
- Vol. 80, 102241
Associations between early-life growth pattern and body size and follicular lymphoma risk and survival: a family-based case-control study
- 1 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Epidemiology
- Vol. 80, 102241
Associations between early-life growth pattern and body size and follicular lymphoma risk and survival: a family-based case-control study
- Open Access
- 28 May 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 12 (1) , 36
Impact on learning of an e-learning module on leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial
Background: e-learning resources may be beneficial for complex or conceptually difficult topics. Leukaemia is one such topic, yet there are no reports on the efficacy of e-learning for leukaemia. This study compared the learning impact on senior medical students of a purpose-built e-learning module on leukaemia, compared with existing online resources. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was performed utilising volunteer senior medical students. Participants were randomly allocated to Study and Control groups. Following a pre-test on leukaemia administered to both groups, the Study group was provided with access to the new e-learning module, while the Control group was directed to existing online resources. A post-test and an evaluation questionnaire were administered to both groups at the end of the trial period. Results: Study and Control groups were equivalent in gender distribution, mean academic ability, pre-test performance and time studying leukaemia during the trial. The Study group performed significantly better than the Control group in the post-test, in which the group to which the students had been allocated was the only significant predictor of performance. The Study group’s evaluation of the module was overwhelmingly positive. Conclusions: A targeted e-learning module on leukaemia had a significant effect on learning in this cohort, compared with existing online resources. We believe that the interactivity, dialogic feedback and integration with the curriculum offered by the e-learning module contributed to its impact. This has implications for e-learning design in medicine and other disciplines.
- 28 May 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 12 (1) , 36
Open AccessImpact on learning of an e-learning module on leukaemia: a randomised controlled trial
Background: e-learning resources may be beneficial for complex or conceptually difficult topics. Leukaemia is one such topic, yet there are no reports on the efficacy of e-learning for leukaemia. This study compared the learning impact on senior medical students of a purpose-built e-learning module on leukaemia, compared with existing online resources. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was performed utilising volunteer senior medical students. Participants were randomly allocated to Study and Control groups. Following a pre-test on leukaemia administered to both groups, the Study group was provided with access to the new e-learning module, while the Control group was directed to existing online resources. A post-test and an evaluation questionnaire were administered to both groups at the end of the trial period. Results: Study and Control groups were equivalent in gender distribution, mean academic ability, pre-test performance and time studying leukaemia during the trial. The Study group performed significantly better than the Control group in the post-test, in which the group to which the students had been allocated was the only significant predictor of performance. The Study group’s evaluation of the module was overwhelmingly positive. Conclusions: A targeted e-learning module on leukaemia had a significant effect on learning in this cohort, compared with existing online resources. We believe that the interactivity, dialogic feedback and integration with the curriculum offered by the e-learning module contributed to its impact. This has implications for e-learning design in medicine and other disciplines.