Gina Moreno-John
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Gina Moreno-John has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anna María Nápoles
Department of Medicine, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, University of California San Francisco, Box 0856, 3333 California Street, Suite 335, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA
2 shared publications - Anita L. Stewart
Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
1 shared publication Anna Nápoles-Springer
University of California, San Francisco
1 shared publicationAnthony Gachie
North Carolina Central University
1 shared publicationCandace M. Fleming
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
1 shared publication- Celia Patricia Kaplan
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 July 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 33 (4) , 624-627
A randomized trial to assess the effect of a research informational pamphlet on telephone survey completion rates among older Latinos
- 1 July 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 33 (4) , 624-627
A randomized trial to assess the effect of a research informational pamphlet on telephone survey completion rates among older Latinos
- Open Access
- 27 May 2010
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®
- Vol. 25 (5) , 389-406
Reviews: Developing Culturally Sensitive Dementia Caregiver Interventions: Are We There Yet?
Despite evidence of ethnic differences in family caregivers’ experiences, the extent to which caregiver interventions are culturally tailored to address these differences is unknown. A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to 2009 identified: differences in caregiving experiences of African American, Latino, and Chinese American caregivers; psychosocial support interventions in these groups; and cultural tailoring of interventions. Ethnic differences in caregiving occurred at multiple levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental) and in multiple domains (psychosocial health, life satisfaction, caregiving appraisals, spirituality, coping, self-efficacy, physical functioning, social support, filial responsibility, familism, views toward elders, use of formal services and health care). Only 18 of 47 intervention articles reported outcomes by caregiver ethnicity. Only 11 reported cultural tailoring; 8 were from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH) initiative. Cultural tailoring addressed familism, language, literacy, protecting elders, and logistical barriers. Results suggest that more caregiver intervention studies evaluating systematically the benefits of cultural tailoring are needed.
- 27 May 2010
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias®
- Vol. 25 (5) , 389-406
Open AccessReviews: Developing Culturally Sensitive Dementia Caregiver Interventions: Are We There Yet?
Despite evidence of ethnic differences in family caregivers’ experiences, the extent to which caregiver interventions are culturally tailored to address these differences is unknown. A systematic review of literature published from 1980 to 2009 identified: differences in caregiving experiences of African American, Latino, and Chinese American caregivers; psychosocial support interventions in these groups; and cultural tailoring of interventions. Ethnic differences in caregiving occurred at multiple levels (intrapersonal, interpersonal, environmental) and in multiple domains (psychosocial health, life satisfaction, caregiving appraisals, spirituality, coping, self-efficacy, physical functioning, social support, filial responsibility, familism, views toward elders, use of formal services and health care). Only 18 of 47 intervention articles reported outcomes by caregiver ethnicity. Only 11 reported cultural tailoring; 8 were from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH) initiative. Cultural tailoring addressed familism, language, literacy, protecting elders, and logistical barriers. Results suggest that more caregiver intervention studies evaluating systematically the benefits of cultural tailoring are needed.
- 1 November 2004
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Aging and Health
- Vol. 16 (5_suppl) , 93S-123S
Ethnic Minority Older Adults Participating in Clinical Research
Objectives:African American, Latino, and American Indian older adults are underrepresented in clinical research studies. A significant barrier to participation in research is mistrust of the scientific community and institutions. The aims of this article are to discuss the lack of representation of ethnic minorities in clinical research. Methods:This article presents a review of the literature regarding medical research mistrust. Also described are the trust-building activities of the Resource Centers on Minority Aging Research (RCMAR), federally funded centers focused on research and aging in communities of color. Discussion:The RCMAR centers are building trust with the communities they serve, resulting in the recruitment and retention of ethnic minority older adults in clinical research studies and health promotion projects. Implications are discussed for other researchers toward building trust with ethnic minority elders to increase their participation in research.
- 1 November 2004
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Aging and Health
- Vol. 16 (5_suppl) , 93S-123S
Ethnic Minority Older Adults Participating in Clinical Research
Objectives:African American, Latino, and American Indian older adults are underrepresented in clinical research studies. A significant barrier to participation in research is mistrust of the scientific community and institutions. The aims of this article are to discuss the lack of representation of ethnic minorities in clinical research. Methods:This article presents a review of the literature regarding medical research mistrust. Also described are the trust-building activities of the Resource Centers on Minority Aging Research (RCMAR), federally funded centers focused on research and aging in communities of color. Discussion:The RCMAR centers are building trust with the communities they serve, resulting in the recruitment and retention of ethnic minority older adults in clinical research studies and health promotion projects. Implications are discussed for other researchers toward building trust with ethnic minority elders to increase their participation in research.