Hans Peter Sørensen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Hans Peter Sørensen has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Gunilla Høyer-Hansen
The Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
1 shared publicationIda K. Lund
The Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
1 shared publication- Knud Jørgen Jensen
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publication Masood Hosseini
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
1 shared publicationPeter A. Andreasen
1 shared publicationTobias Kromann-Hansen
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 19 September 2012
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 51 (39) , 7804-7811
Interconversion of Active and Inactive Conformations of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
The catalytic activity of serine proteases depends on a salt-bridge between the amino group of residue 16 and the side chain of Asp194. The salt-bridge stabilizes the oxyanion hole and the S1 specificity pocket of the protease. Some serine proteases exist in only partially active forms, in which the amino group of residue 16 is exposed to the solvent. Such a partially active state is assumed by a truncated form of the murine urokinase-type plasminogen activator (muPA), consisting of residues 16–243. Here we investigated the allosteric interconversion between partially active states and the fully active state. Both a monoclonal antibody (mU3) and a peptidic inhibitor (mupain-1–16) stabilize the active state. The epitope of mU3 is located in the 37- and 70-loops at a site homologous to exosite I of thrombin. The N-terminus(Ile16) of muPA(16–243) was less exposed upon binding of mU3 or mupain-1–16. In contrast, introduction of the mutations F40Y or E137A into muPA(16–243) increased exposure of the N-terminus(Ile16) and resulted in large changes in the thermodynamic parameters for mupain-1–16 binding. We conclude that the distorted state of muPA(16–243) is conformationally ordered upon binding of ligands to the active site and upon binding of mU3 to the 37- and 70-loops. Our study establishes the 37- and 70-loops as a unique site for binding to compounds stabilizing the active state of serine proteases.
- 19 September 2012
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 51 (39) , 7804-7811
Interconversion of Active and Inactive Conformations of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
The catalytic activity of serine proteases depends on a salt-bridge between the amino group of residue 16 and the side chain of Asp194. The salt-bridge stabilizes the oxyanion hole and the S1 specificity pocket of the protease. Some serine proteases exist in only partially active forms, in which the amino group of residue 16 is exposed to the solvent. Such a partially active state is assumed by a truncated form of the murine urokinase-type plasminogen activator (muPA), consisting of residues 16–243. Here we investigated the allosteric interconversion between partially active states and the fully active state. Both a monoclonal antibody (mU3) and a peptidic inhibitor (mupain-1–16) stabilize the active state. The epitope of mU3 is located in the 37- and 70-loops at a site homologous to exosite I of thrombin. The N-terminus(Ile16) of muPA(16–243) was less exposed upon binding of mU3 or mupain-1–16. In contrast, introduction of the mutations F40Y or E137A into muPA(16–243) increased exposure of the N-terminus(Ile16) and resulted in large changes in the thermodynamic parameters for mupain-1–16 binding. We conclude that the distorted state of muPA(16–243) is conformationally ordered upon binding of ligands to the active site and upon binding of mU3 to the 37- and 70-loops. Our study establishes the 37- and 70-loops as a unique site for binding to compounds stabilizing the active state of serine proteases.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Microbial Cell Factories
- Vol. 9 (1) , 27
Towards universal systems for recombinant gene expression
Recombinant gene expression is among the most important techniques used both in molecular and medical research and in industrial settings. Today, two recombinant expression systems are particularly well represented in the literature reporting on recombinant expression of specific genes. According to searches in the PubMed citation database, during the last 15 years 80% of all recombinant genes reported on in the literature were expressed in either the enterobacterium Escherichia coli or the methylotropic yeast Pichia pastoris. Nevertheless, some eukaryotic proteins are misfolded or inadequately posttranslationally modified in these expression systems. This situation demands identification of other recombinant expression systems that enable the proper expression of the remaining eukaryotic genes. As of now, a single universal system allowing expression of all target genes is still a distant goal. In this light, thorough experimental screening for systems that can yield satisfying quantity and quality of target protein is required. In recent years, a number of new expression systems have been described and used for protein production. Two systems, namely Drosophila melanogaster S2 insect cells and human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells stably expressing the EBNA-1 gene, show exceptional promise. The time has come to identify a few well-performing systems that will allow us to express, purify, and characterize entire eukaryotic genomes.
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Microbial Cell Factories
- Vol. 9 (1) , 27
Open AccessTowards universal systems for recombinant gene expression
Recombinant gene expression is among the most important techniques used both in molecular and medical research and in industrial settings. Today, two recombinant expression systems are particularly well represented in the literature reporting on recombinant expression of specific genes. According to searches in the PubMed citation database, during the last 15 years 80% of all recombinant genes reported on in the literature were expressed in either the enterobacterium Escherichia coli or the methylotropic yeast Pichia pastoris. Nevertheless, some eukaryotic proteins are misfolded or inadequately posttranslationally modified in these expression systems. This situation demands identification of other recombinant expression systems that enable the proper expression of the remaining eukaryotic genes. As of now, a single universal system allowing expression of all target genes is still a distant goal. In this light, thorough experimental screening for systems that can yield satisfying quantity and quality of target protein is required. In recent years, a number of new expression systems have been described and used for protein production. Two systems, namely Drosophila melanogaster S2 insect cells and human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells stably expressing the EBNA-1 gene, show exceptional promise. The time has come to identify a few well-performing systems that will allow us to express, purify, and characterize entire eukaryotic genomes.