AFAlison M. Friedmann

Alison M. Friedmann

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Alison M. Friedmann has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Characterization of Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma After Autologous Stem Cell Transplant and External Beam Radiotherapy

    by Mathew Lin, Jie Jane Chen, Rochelle Bagatell, Sherif G. Shaaban, Benjamin J. Lerman, Suzanne Shusterman, Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou, Torunn I. Yock, Paul J. Catalano, Hesham Elhalawani, et al.

    Background: Limited data inform the outcomes of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) who relapse after high-dose chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Methods: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study of 84 patients with HR-NBL diagnosed between 1997–2021 with a first recurrence after definitive upfront treatment, including ≥1 ASCT and EBRT. Site(s) of first relapse were defined with relation to a patient’s primary tumor location. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used for univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: Twenty-four patients had local recurrences with or without distant relapses (LR) and 60 had distant relapses only. The LR cohort had higher rates of MYCN amplification (70% vs. 36%, p = 0.016). At relapse, the LR cohort had lower rates of additional radiotherapy (32% vs. 61%, p = 0.029) and higher rates of additional surgery (29% vs. 5%, p = 0.005), with similar rates of chemotherapy for both cohorts. With a median follow-up after first relapse of 1.53 years (range: 0.03–15.82), there were no significant differences in interval PFS and OS between the cohorts. After controlling for age at diagnosis and pattern of recurrence, time to interval relapse ≥ 2 years was a significant predictor of improved OS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29–0.85, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Patients with relapsed HR-NBL have poor outcomes with median OS < 2 years. Time to relapse was a significant predictor of OS.


  • Lymphoma in Pediatric-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Infliximab Monotherapy: A Case Series

    by Alejandro Llanos-Chea, Jason M. Shapiro, Rachel W. Winter, Logan Jerger, Timothy Menz, Meghan Gibson, Alison M. Friedmann, Diana Treaba, Konstantinos Papamichael, Adam S. Cheifetz, et al.

    Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are often treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) medications. Concomitant treatment of IBD with anti-TNFα agents and immunomodulators appears to be associated with an increased risk for lymphoma. Methods Patients who developed lymphoma while on monotherapy with an anti-TNFα agent were identified at three centers. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Results Five adolescents and young adult patients with pediatric-onset IBD who were treated with infliximab (IFX) without exposure to thiopurines were subsequently diagnosed with lymphoma. Three of the five patients had bone involvement at presentation. Epstein–Barr virus was positive in 2 cases. Median time from diagnosis of IBD and exposure to IFX prior to diagnosis of lymphoma was 5 and 4.3 years, respectively. Conclusions This case series reports long-term follow-up for young patients with IBD who were treated with IFX monotherapy and developed lymphoma. Three of the five patients had bone involvement. In general, the risk of lymphoma following exposure to anti-TNFα medications alone remains low, but the incidence of primary bone lymphomas in IBD has not been reported. Studies examining longer exposure times may be needed to determine the true lymphoma risk in patients treated with IFX monotherapy.


  • Outcomes of a clinical pathway for primary outpatient management of pediatric patients with low‐risk febrile neutropenia

    by Jonathan Paolino, Juliana Mariani, Alexandra Lucas, Jeremy Rupon, Howard Weinstein, Annah Abrams, Alison Friedmann

    Background: Fever and neutropenia is a common reason for nonelective hospitalization of pediatric oncology patients. Herein we report nearly five years of experience with a clinical pathway designed to guide outpatient management for patients who had low‐risk features.Procedures: Through a multidisciplinary collaboration, we implemented a clinical pathway at our institution using established low‐risk criteria to guide outpatient management of pediatric oncology patients. Comprehensive chart review of all febrile neutropenia episodes was conducted to characterize outcomes of patients with low‐risk febrile neutropenia following clinical pathway implementation.Results: Between April 1, 2013, and October 1, 2017, there were 169 cases of febrile neutropenia managed in our Pediatric Oncology Unit. Sixty‐seven (40%) of these episodes were defined as low risk and managed either entirely in the outpatient setting (41 episodes, 24%) or with a step‐down strategy involving a very brief inpatient stay (26 episodes, 15%). There were no intensive care unit admissions or deaths among the low‐risk patients. Of those identified as low risk, seven patients (10%) required subsequent hospitalization during the follow‐up period, two for inadequate oral intake, two for persistent fevers, one for cellulitis, one for seizure unrelated to the febrile episode, and one for a positive blood culture.Conclusions: Following implementation of a clinical pathway, the majority of patients designated as low risk were managed primarily in the outpatient setting without major morbidity or mortality, suggesting that carefully selected low‐risk patients can be successfully treated with outpatient management and subsequent admission if warranted.