MRMichael L. Robinson

Michael L. Robinson

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Michael L. Robinson has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Gustavo Leone

    Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, College of Medicine

    2 shared publications
  • Jean-Leon Chong

    Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine; Department of Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

    2 shared publications
  • Pamela L. Wenzel

    Department of Integrative Biology & Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA

    2 shared publications
  • Alain de Bruin

    Human Cancer Genetics Program, Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Andrew D. Hancher

    Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA

    1 shared publication
  • Antoney Ferrey

    Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine; Department of Molecular Genetics, College of Biological Sciences; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Frs2α enhances fibroblast growth factor-mediated survival and differentiation in lens development

    by Bhavani P. Madakashira, Daniel A. Kobrinski, Andrew D. Hancher, Elizabeth C. Arneman, Brad D. Wagner, Fen Wang, Hailey Shin, Frank J. Lovicu, Lixing W. Reneker, Michael L. Robinson

    Most growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) signal through similar intracellular pathways, but they often have divergent biological effects. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of channeling the intracellular effect of RTK stimulation to facilitate specific biological responses represents a fundamental biological challenge. Lens epithelial cells express numerous RTKs with the ability to initiate the phosphorylation (activation) of Erk1/2 and PI3-K/Akt signaling. However, only Fgfr stimulation leads to lens fiber cell differentiation in the developing mammalian embryo. Additionally, within the lens, only Fgfrs activate the signal transduction molecule Frs2α. Loss of Frs2α in the lens significantly increases apoptosis and decreases phosphorylation of both Erk1/2 and Akt. Also, Frs2α deficiency decreases the expression of several proteins characteristic of lens fiber cell differentiation, including Prox1, p57KIP2, aquaporin 0 and β-crystallins. Although not normally expressed in the lens, the RTK TrkC phosphorylates Frs2α in response to binding the ligand NT3. Transgenic lens epithelial cells expressing both TrkC and NT3 exhibit several features characteristic of lens fiber cells. These include elongation, increased Erk1/2 and Akt phosphorylation, and the expression of β-crystallins. All these characteristics of NT3-TrkC transgenic lens epithelial cells depend on Frs2α. Therefore, tyrosine phosphorylation of Frs2α mediates Fgfr-dependent lens cell survival and provides a mechanistic basis for the unique fiber-differentiating capacity of Fgfs on mammalian lens epithelial cells.


  • Cell proliferation in the absence of E2F1-3

    by Pamela L. Wenzel, Jean-Leon Chong, M. Teresa Sáenz-Robles, Antoney Ferrey, John P. Hagan, Yorman M. Gomez, Ravi Rajmohan, Nidhi Sharma, Hui-Zi Chen, James M. Pipas, et al.


  • Rb is critical in a mammalian tissue stem cell population

    by Pamela L. Wenzel, Lizhao Wu, Alain de Bruin, Jean-Leon Chong, Wen-Yi Chen, Geoffrey Dureska, Emily Sites, Tony Pan, Ashish Sharma, Kun Huang, et al.

    The inactivation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor gene in mice results in ectopic proliferation, apoptosis, and impaired differentiation in extraembryonic, neural, and erythroid lineages, culminating in fetal death by embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5). Here we show that the specific loss of Rb in trophoblast stem (TS) cells, but not in trophoblast derivatives, leads to an overexpansion of trophoblasts, a disruption of placental architecture, and fetal death by E15.5. Despite profound placental abnormalities, fetal tissues appeared remarkably normal, suggesting that the full manifestation of fetal phenotypes requires the loss of Rb in both extraembryonic and fetal tissues. Loss of Rb resulted in an increase of E2f3 expression, and the combined ablation of Rb and E2f3 significantly suppressed Rb mutant phenotypes. This rescue appears to be cell autonomous since the inactivation of Rb and E2f3 in TS cells restored placental development and extended the life of embryos to E17.5. Taken together, these results demonstrate that loss of Rb in TS cells is the defining event causing lethality of Rb−/− embryos and reveal the convergence of extraembryonic and fetal functions of Rb in neural and erythroid development. We conclude that the Rb pathway plays a critical role in the maintenance of a mammalian stem cell population.


    • 10 January 2006
      • Vol. 12, 15-25

    Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (Fgfr1) is not essential for lens fiber differentiation in mice.

    by Haotian Zhao, Ying Yang, Juha Partanen, Brian G Ciruna, Janet Rossant, Michael L Robinson

    The developing lens expresses at least three different FGF receptor genes (Fgfr1, Fgfr2, Fgfr3). Furthermore, FGFs have been shown to induce lens epithelial cells to differentiate into fiber cells both in vitro and in vivo. While the loss of Fgfr2 alone does not prevent fiber differentiation and the loss of Fgfr3 alone does not appear to affect lens development, the independent role of Fgfr1 in lens development has not been reported. These experiments were conducted to determine if Fgfr1 plays an independent, essential role in lens development. To address this question, we took two complementary approaches. First, we employed the aphakia (ak) lens complementation system to show that Fgfr1 deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells were able to form a normal embryonic lens that maintains a normal pattern of crystallin gene expression. Second, we employed the Cre-loxP system to achieve lens-specific inactivation of Fgfr1. Fgfr1 null embryonic stem cells were able to rescue normal embryonic lens development in chimeric combination with aphakia mutant embryos. In addition, conditional deletion of Fgfr1 does not compromise lens development either before or after birth. The results of both approaches suggest that lens epithelial cell integrity, cell cycle regulation and lens fiber differentiation are intact in the Fgfr1 deficient lens. Overall, our results demonstrate that Fgfr1 is not cell autonomously essential for lens development and suggests functional redundancy among different FGF receptor genes with respect to lens fiber differentiation.