Adriana Medianeira Rossato

Background: Infection is an important complication of epidermolysis bullosa (EB), and Staphylococcus aureus has been pointed out as the most common pathogen among this population. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of S. aureus colonizing EB patients in Brazil.Methods: This cross‐sectional multicenter study was conducted between December 2015 and December 2017. We included a total of 89 individuals with EB from medical centers across Brazil. Data were obtained through clinical and bacteriological investigation. S. aureus were identified by biochemical tests. The nuc and mecA genes were confirmed by PCR assay. Antimicrobial susceptibility was investigated by disk diffusion method.Results: The overall prevalence of S. aureus was 51.7% (46/89). Methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was detected in 24.7% (19/77) of all S. aureus isolates, colonizing 15.7% (14/89) of all patients. Community‐associated (CA)‐MRSA strains were resistant against sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and levofloxacin (P < 0.05%). S. aureus colonization of the nares and belly button represented a 3.4 times higher risk of simultaneous skin lesion colonization (P < 0.05%).Conclusions: The high frequency of MRSA colonizing patients with EB is alarming considering its association with life‐threatening complications and poorer outcomes. EB patients are at increased risk of colonization and infection by Staphylococcus aureus and CA‐MRSA. Getting to know S. aureus carriage sites and its antimicrobial susceptibility profile is key when planning new individualized and more effective prophylactic and therapeutic measures.

In methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment, the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) increase, vancomycin heteroresistance (hVISA) presence, and accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction are predictors of vancomycin therapy failure. This study evaluated the association between vancomycin MIC (≥ 1.0 μg/mL) and agr dysfunction in invasive MRSA isolates. Vancomycin MIC, hVISA phenotype, agr group, and function were determined in 171 MRSA isolates obtained between 2014 and 2019 from hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil. All MRSA were susceptible to vancomycin; 16.4% of these had MIC ≥ 1.0 μg/mL. Seventeen MRSA isolates expressed the hVISA phenotype; 35.3% of them had MIC of 1.5 μg/mL. agr groups I (40.9%) and II (47.1%) were the most found groups for MRSA and hVISA isolates, respectively. The proportion of MRSA with vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.0 μg/mL in agr group II was significantly higher than in agr groups I and III (p = 0.002). agr dysfunction was observed in 4.7% (8/171) of MRSA, especially those with vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.0 μg/mL (p < 0.001). In addition, six isolates (35.3%; 6/17) with hVISA phenotype presented agr dysfunction, which was significantly higher than that in non-hVISA phenotype (p < 0.001). In conclusion, agr dysfunction in MRSA is associated with vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.0 μg/mL and hVISA phenotype, which suggests that agr dysfunction might confer potential advantages on MRSA to survive in invasive infections.

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections. Owing to the restricted use of beta-lactams in MRSA infections, non-beta-lactam antimicrobials are required for treatment. However, MRSA can develop resistance mechanisms to non-beta-lactam antimicrobials, which reduces viable treatment options. Here, we evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance genes of MRSA isolated from hospitalized patients in South Brazil. Methods: The antimicrobial susceptibilities of hospital MRSA (217) isolates were determined by disk diffusion or microdilution methods. Additionally, the presence of 14 resistance genes and SCCmec typing was performed by PCR. Results: Among the antimicrobials tested, we observed high erythromycin (74.2%), ciprofloxacin (64.5%), and clindamycin (46.1%) resistance rates and complete susceptibility to linezolid and vancomycin. Seventeen different patterns of MRSA antimicrobial resistance were observed, of which 42.9% represented multidrug resistance. Among erythromycin-resistant MRSA, 53.4%, 45.3%, 37.9%, 13.0%, and 6.8% carried ermA, msrA, msrB, ermC, and ermB genes, respectively. Among clindamycin-resistant MRSA, 83%, 17%, 10%, 4%, and 2% carried ermA, ermC, ermB, linA, and linB genes, respectively. Among gentamicin-resistant MRSA, 96.8%, 83.9%, and 9.7% carried aac(6')/aph(2''), aph(3')-IIIa, and ant(4')-Ia genes, respectively. Among tetracycline-resistant MRSA, 6.5% and 93.5% carried tetK and tetM genes, respectively. Lastly, among trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant MRSA, 13.3% and 100% carried dfrA and dfrG genes, respectively. The SCCmec type IV isolates were detected more frequently, whereas the SCCmec type III isolates exhibited higher multidrug resistance. Conclusions: The study data provides information regarding the MRSA resistance profile in South Brazil that is associated with the clinical conditions of patients and can contribute to clinical decision-making.

Justificativa e Objetivos: Staphylococcus aureus resistente à meticilina (MRSA) é uma das causas mais frequentes de infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde e comunitárias, e com seu avanço, a vancomicina tornou-se a principal opção terapêutica. Entretanto, o seu uso indiscriminado favoreceu o surgimento de MRSA com reduzida suscetibilidade à vancomicina, comumente associados com falhas no tratamento, bacteremia persistente, hospitalização prolongada e desfechos clínicos adversos. Este estudo avaliou a ocorrência de MRSA com reduzida suscetibilidade à vancomicina e determinou algumas características moleculares em comparação com MRSA suscetível à vancomicina (VS-MRSA). Métodos: Determinação do perfil de suscetibilidade aos antimicrobianos, a concentração inibitória mínima (CIM) e concentração bactericida mínima (CBM) para vancomicina, tolerância à vancomicina, tipagem do SCCmec e agr foram realizadas em um total de 177 MRSA. Posteriormente, foram triados para hVISA por BHIA-3V e BHIA-6V e confirmados com a Análise do Perfil Populacional - Área Abaixo da Curva (PAP-AUC). Resultados: Os fenótipos VT-MRSA e hVISA foram encontrados em 13,6% e 5,1% dos isolados clínicos de MRSA, respectivamente, e a presença de hVISA foi estatisticamente significativa entre os isolados de VT-MRSA (p