Ilaria Pozzato

Emergency Departments (EDs) are high-pressure environments that place significant psychological and physiological stress on both patients and healthcare staff. Despite increasing awareness of stress-related impacts, proactive stress management interventions have limited uptake in healthcare. This proof-of-concept study will evaluate WeCare: a 6-week, wearable-integrated, self-guided program grounded in a “Learn–Track–Act” framework to support stress regulation, resilience, and wellbeing. The study will examine four key aspects of implementing the program: (1) feasibility, (2) acceptability and usability, (3) preliminary clinical effectiveness (self-report and physiological outcomes), and (4) preliminary economic impacts. Using a mixed-methods, multiple-baseline N-of-1 design, the program will be trialled with up to 32 participants across four ED-exposed groups: patients with non-severe or severe injuries, patients with acute medical presentations, and ED staff. The intervention includes digital psychoeducation, continuous biofeedback via a smart ring, personalised guidance, and evidence-based self-regulation strategies. Assessments will include standardised questionnaires combined with continuous physiological monitoring via a smartwatch, and interviews. Quantitative outcomes include heart rate variability, sleep patterns, perceived stress, wellbeing, healthcare use, and time off work. Qualitative interviews will explore user experience, usability, and perceived barriers. The findings will inform the refinement of the intervention and co-design of a larger-scale trial, contributing valuable evidence to support low-cost, wearable-enabled proactive mental healthcare in high-stress healthcare environments.

To investigate the cumulative health burden and complex challenges to adjustment following road traffic injuries (RTIs), this study examined multiple environmental, personal, and health-related factors and outcomes over 12 months in a comprehensive and holistic way, comparing these outcomes between injured and non-injured controls. A longitudinal controlled cohort study was conducted with two groups: adults with mild to moderate RTIs and non-injured controls. Assessments occurred at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. The study involved 120 RTI participants and 112 controls. Data on physiological, psychological, cognitive, and social factors were collected and analyzed using the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. The ICF Components—Impairments in Body Functions and Structures, Limitations in Activity, Restrictions to Participation, Environmental and Personal Contextual Factors—were used to link and categorize data and compare outcomes, allowing comprehensive evaluation of RTI-related burden and adjustment challenges. The RTI group exhibited significantly worse outcomes across all measured ICF Components, including higher pain, fatigue, psychological distress, and cognitive impairment. Despite some improvements over time, the RTI group continued to experience elevated symptoms, functional limitations, and restricted participation compared to controls at 12 months. RTIs lead to sustained, multidimensional challenges to adjustment, emphasizing the need for early, comprehensive, and ongoing interventions for at least 1-year post-injury. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating multiple biopsychosocial factors and adopting a holistic framework to fully understand recovery patterns. Addressing these factors simultaneously across multiple systems is essential to improve recovery outcomes. ACTRN12616001445460.

Cognitive impairment is a common complication following spinal cord injury (SCI) and imposes a significant negative impact on adjustment, functional independence, physical and mental health, and quality of life. It is unclear whether interventions for cognitive impairment following SCI are effective. A systematic review of controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effect of interventions on cognitive functions in adults with SCI using search engines: Embase, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, and study findings were synthesized and summarized. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Eight moderate-quality studies were found that investigated the effects of physical exercise/activity-based therapy plus cognitive training or intermittent hypoxia, diet modification and dietary supplements, tibial nerve or cortical stimulation, and drug therapy on cognitive function in SCI. Physical exercise/activity–based therapy plus cognitive training showed most promise for improving cognitive functions, while drug therapy, diet modification, and dietary supplements showed potential for improving cognitive function. However, about half of the participants experienced heightened instability in blood pressure following the administration of midodrine, and one participant reported gastrointestinal side effects after taking omega-3 fatty acids. There was no evidence of improvement in cognitive function for stimulation techniques. The current review highlights the scarcity of research investigating the effectiveness of interventions that target cognitive function after SCI. Further, the effects of these eight studies are uncertain due to concerns about the quality of designs and small sample sizes utilized in the trials, as well as the employment of insensitive neurocognitive tests when applied to adults with SCI. This review highlights a significant gap in knowledge related to SCI cognitive rehabilitation.

Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-F) is a neurocardiac self-regulation therapy that aims to regulate cardiac autonomic nervous system activity and improve cardiac balance. Despite benefits in various clinical populations, no study has reported the effects of HRV-F in adults with a spinal cord injury (SCI). This article provides an overview of a neuropsychophysiological laboratory framework and reports the impact of an HRV-F training program on two adults with chronic SCI (T1 AIS A and T3 AIS C) with different degrees of remaining cardiac autonomic function. The HRV-F intervention involved 10 weeks of face-to-face and telehealth sessions with daily HRV-F home practice. Physiological (HRV, blood pressure variability (BPV), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS)), and self-reported assessments (Fatigue Severity Scale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Appraisal of Disability and Participation Scale, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale) were conducted at baseline and 10 weeks. Participants also completed weekly diaries capturing mood, anxiety, pain, sleep quality, fatigue, and adverse events. Results showed some improvement in HRV, BPV, and BRS. Additionally, participants self-reported some improvements in mood, fatigue, pain, quality of life, and self-perception. A 10-week HRV-F intervention was feasible in two participants with chronic SCI, warranting further investigation into its autonomic and psychosocial effects.

Cognitive impairment is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), impacting their daily functioning and rehabilitation. This study assesses the extent of self-reported cognitive failures in everyday life in persons with SCI and its relationships with objective neurocognitive measures and psychosocial factors, including depressive mood, anxiety, perceived control, and fatigue. The differences between forty-one adults with a chronic SCI and forty-one able-bodied controls were examined. The participants completed the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) to assess cognitive failure and neurocognitive tests assessing attention and executive functions, as well as a psychosocial assessment. The SCI group reported higher cognitive failure rates than the able-bodied group (31.7% versus 19%, p > 0.05). Objective neurocognitive tests did not significantly correlate with the CFQ scores in either group. However, the CFQ scores were positively associated with most psychosocial factors, even after controlling for covariates. The CFQ scores were significantly associated with depressive mood in persons with SCI. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating self-reported cognitive measures into neurocognitive assessments and rehabilitation planning for adults with SCI. Self-reports capture everyday cognitive challenges that objective tests may miss. Additionally, this study highlights the strong connections between cognitive failures and psychosocial issues, particularly mood disorders, emphasizing the need for comprehensive rehabilitation and psychosocial support post-SCI, addressing both cognitive and emotional wellbeing.

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a common secondary condition associated with spinal cord injury (SCI). Cognitive reserve (CR) is believed to protect against cognitive decline and can be assessed by premorbid intelligence (pmIQ). Despite the potential utility of pmIQ as a complementary metric in the evaluation of MCI in SCI, this approach has been infrequently employed. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between MCI and pmIQ in adults with SCI with the aim of exploring the potential value of pmIQ as a marker of CR in this population. Methods: Cognitive function was assessed on three occasions in adults with SCI over a 12-month period post-injury, and pmIQ was assessed once at baseline. Demographic and mental health measures were also collected, and logistic regression was conducted to determine the strength of association between pmIQ and MCI while adjusting for factors such as mental health and age. Results: The regression analysis revealed that at the time of admission to SCI rehabilitation, the MCI assessed by a valid neurocognitive screen was strongly associated with pmIQ. That is, if a person has MCI, there was 5.4 greater odds (p < 0.01) that they will have poor pmIQ compared to a person without MCI after adjustment for age and mental health. Conclusions: The assessment of CR is an important area that should be considered to improve the process of diagnosing MCI in adults with an acute SCI and potentially facilitate earlier intervention to slow or prevent cognitive decline.