Ruoyu Miao

Recurrence after curative-intent resection or ablation remains a major barrier to cure in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Postoperative sorafenib was neutral in STORM, the initial recurrence-free survival signal with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in IMbrave050 was not sustained with longer follow-up, and pembrolizumab was neutral in KEYNOTE-937. By contrast, perioperative camrelizumab plus rivoceranib improved event-free survival in CARES-009. This focused narrative review separates direct HCC clinical evidence from preclinical, cross-tumor, and translational evidence and addresses three development questions: how to test the intact-tumor antigen-source hypothesis, how to select patients biologically, and how to advance perioperative regimens without compromising curative surgery. The primary tumor and its draining lymphatic network may support antigen presentation and expansion of tumor-reactive lymphocytes during checkpoint blockade, but no randomized HCC trial has isolated treatment timing while holding regimen, exposure, population, and time origin constant. CARES-009 therefore validates one complete perioperative strategy rather than proving that neoadjuvant exposure caused benefit. Biological selection should proceed across the treatment pathway: pretreatment clinical risk and liver reserve establish eligibility; on-treatment safety and tissue response assess pharmacodynamic activity; and postoperative pathology, circulating tumor DNA, alpha-fetoprotein/des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin kinetics, and spatial immune features refine residual risk. These markers are prognostic, but none has demonstrated treatment-predictive utility in a randomized biomarker-guided trial. A stage-gated development program should establish agent-specific dose and washout, preserve operability, separate timing and treatment components in randomized phase II studies, and then confirm durable event-free and overall survival in globally representative phase III trials. Durable cure without loss of surgical opportunity, hepatic reserve, or quality of life should define success.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) rearrangements represent one of the most actionable molecular alterations in biliary tract cancer, particularly in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Approximately 10–16% of iCCA cases harbor FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, defining a distinct molecular subtype characterized by sensitivity to FGFR-targeted therapies. Selective FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including the reversible inhibitor pemigatinib and the irreversible inhibitor futibatinib, have demonstrated clinically meaningful response rates and durable disease control in patients with previously treated FGFR2-altered iCCA, leading to regulatory approvals and the incorporation of FGFR inhibition into contemporary treatment paradigms. However, the development of acquired resistance—most commonly driven by secondary kinase-domain mutations and activation of bypass signaling pathways—remains a major limitation to sustained therapeutic benefit. This review summarizes the biological basis of FGFR2 alterations, highlights current clinical evidence supporting FGFR inhibition, and discusses the evolving landscape of resistance mechanisms. We further examine emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming resistance, including next-generation FGFR inhibitors and rational combination approaches. In addition, we highlight the growing role of circulating tumor DNA as a noninvasive tool for longitudinal molecular monitoring and treatment guidance. Together, these insights underscore the central role of FGFR2-directed therapy in precision oncology for biliary tract cancer and provide a framework for optimizing and extending targeted treatment in this molecularly defined disease subset.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with KRAS mutations occurring in approximately 40% of cases. These mutations drive tumorigenesis through the constitutive activation of key signaling pathways, such as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) and PI3K-AKT-mTOR, contributing to therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. Advances in molecular biology have led to significant breakthroughs, including the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib, which have shown promise in clinical trials. However, their efficacy is limited to a small subset of KRAS-mutant CRC, and resistance mechanisms often emerge through compensatory pathway activation. Combination strategies, including KRAS inhibitors with anti-EGFR agents, have been explored in trials like KRYSTAL-1 and CodeBreaK 300. Emerging research highlights the role of the tumor microenvironment in immune evasion and therapeutic resistance, offering opportunities for novel immunotherapy approaches, including KRAS neoantigen vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapy. Despite these advancements, challenges such as intratumoral heterogeneity, limited immune infiltration, and non-G12C KRAS mutations remain significant hurdles. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular mechanisms, current advances and challenges, and future prospects in the management of KRAS-mutant CRC.

Background: Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in pancreatic cancer with mutations in HRR genes other than BRCA and PALB2. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 48 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline and/or somatic HRR mutations who were treated with PARPis. Results: Thirty patients had germline (g)HRR mutations only, twelve had somatic (s)HRR mutations only, and six had concomitant gHRR and sHRR mutations. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Five patients received olaparib in the front-line setting due to borderline performance status. Their ORR was 20%, and their mPFS and mOS were both 11.3 months. The ORR was higher in patients with BRCA or PALB2 mutations (germline or somatic) than in those with non-BRCA/PALB2 mutations. Patients with somatic non-BRCA/PALB2 variants had a shorter mPFS. Patients with concomitant gHRR/sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had a significantly longer mPFS than those with sHRR mutations only. Conclusions: PARP inhibitors may be considered for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA who cannot tolerate standard chemotherapy. Maintenance PARPis can be considered in selected patients with non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations.

2525 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause a variety of inflammatory autoimmune tissue damage, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). COVID-19 is associated with increased amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, which may synergistically affect the outcome of irAEs. Data are limited regarding the impact of COVID-19 on irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with malignant solid tumors treated with ICIs at AdventHealth Orlando between August 2020 and August 2021. All COVID-19 infections were confirmed by PCR. Patients who had the most recent ICI treatment over one month before or after the positive COVID-19 test were excluded from the study. For COVID-19 positive group, only the irAEs that developed after COVID-19 infection were considered as events. Results: A total of 579 patients were included in our study, with 46 (7.9%) in COVID-19 positive group, and 533 (92.1%) in COVID-19 negative group. The baseline characteristics of patients in the two groups were similar in terms of age, ethnicity, ECOG, cancer histology, and type of ICI. With a median follow-up of 10 months (1-73 months), no differences in the time from ICI initiation to irAE onset, corticosteroid use, or additional immunosuppressant use were seen. A trend in higher incidence of all-grade diarrhea/colitis (8.7% vs. 3.0%, p=0.07) and grade 3 and 4 hepatitis (4.3% vs. 0.8%, p=0.08) was noted in the COVID-19 positive group, however the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference in the incidence of pneumonitis (2.2% vs. 1.1%, p=0.44), nephritis (2.2% vs. 0.8%, p=0.34) or dermatitis (6.5% vs. 6.4%, p=1.00) were noted between COVID-19 positive and negative groups. We noticed a higher incidence of all-grade irAEs in the COVID-19 positive group (30.4% vs. 19.9%, p=0.18), but the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 irAEs was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive group (10.9% vs. 3.2%, p=0.02). Nine COVID-19 related death occurred while no irAE-related death was noted in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Our study suggested that COVID-19 may pose a risk of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs. Close monitoring and possible delaying ICI administration could be considered when cancer patients were infected with COVID-19. [Table: see text]

Background. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas (DDCSs) are highly malignant tumors with a dismal prognosis and present a significant challenge in clinical management. Methods. In an IRB approved retrospective protocol, we identified 72 patients with DDCS treated at our institution between 1993 and 2017 and reviewed clinicopathological characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes to analyze prognostic factors. Results. Femur (44.4%), pelvis (22.2%), and humerus (12.5%) were most commonly involved sites. Twenty-three patients (31.9%) presented with distant metastasis, and 3 (4.2%) of them also had regional lymph node involvement. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.9 months. On multivariate analysis, pathological fracture, larger tumor size, lymph node involvement, metastasis at diagnosis, extraosseous extension, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma component correlated with worse OS, whereas surgical resection and chemotherapy were associated with improved OS. For progression-free survival (PFS), pathological fracture and metastasis at diagnosis showed increased risk, while chemotherapy was associated with decreased risk. Among patients who received chemotherapy, doxorubicin and cisplatin were significantly associated with improved PFS but not OS. Among patients without metastasis at diagnosis, 17 (34.7%) developed local recurrence. Thirty-one (63.3%) developed distant metastases at a median interval of 18.1 months. On multivariate analysis, R1/R2 resection was related with local recurrence, while macroscopic dedifferentiated component was associated with distant metastasis. Conclusions. The prognosis of DDCS is poor. Complete resection remains a significant prognostic factor for local control. Chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin seems to have better PFS. More prognostic, multicenter trials are warranted to further explore the effectiveness of chemotherapy in selected DDCS patients.

Although patients with gallbladder papillary adenocarcinoma (GBPA) appear to have better prognoses than patients with other pathological subtypes of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), the clinicopathological features and outcomes of GBPA have not been fully explored. This study therefore analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of GBPA.This study included 16 patients with GBPA and 101 with gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA) not otherwise specified (NOS), all diagnosed pathologically after surgical resection. Clinicopathological and survival data were retrospectively collected and compared. Fever was significantly more common in GBPA (7/16 vs 10/101; P = 0.000). Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was increased in 1 of 9 patients with GBPA and 39 of 76 with GBA (P = 0.022). More patients with GBPA underwent curative resection (15/16 vs 54/101; P = 0.009). Pathologically, patients with GBPA were at much earlier tumor (T) (4 in situ, 8 T1; P = 0.000) and Tumor, Node, Metastases (TNM) stages (P = 0.000). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in patients with GBPA (100%, 76.9%, and 76.9%, respectively), than in patients with GBA (72.2%, 38.8%, and 31.0%, respectively; P = 0.001). Preoperative jaundice (odds ratio 7.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-38.76; P = 0.013) was a significant prognostic factor in patients with GBA, but was no longer significant when the patients with GBA and GBPA were pooled together. The clinicopathological features of patients with GBPA differed from those in patients with GBA (not otherwise specified). Pooling of patients may mask prognostic factors in each group.