JOJohn O’dOnoghue

John O’dOnoghue

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


John O’dOnoghue has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Do You Want to Make a Battery? Insights from the Development and Evaluation of a Chemistry Public Engagement Activity

    by John O’dOnoghue, Natalia García Doménech, Dearbhla Tully, Niamh McGoldrick, Fiona McArdle, Mary Connolly, David J. Otway, Will Daly, Lynette Keeney, Mervyn Horgan

    Chemistry is often associated with formal learning environments and has been described as overly serious by the general public, lacking some of the fun and energy of other sciences. However, it is difficult to provide hands-on chemistry activities outside the lab and other formal learning environments. Here, a simple electrochemistry based activity has been used for public engagement using household items and play dough to create a fun and playful experience for all ages. The benefits afforded by outdoor learning for developing curiosity and interest in science has also been explored through different event formats. The use of a "Smiley Stand" with "emojis" for gathering participant feedback was successfully deployed alongside interviews with the "Ambassadors" who facilitated the activity. Overall, it was found that the activity encouraged two-way conversations between the participants and the ambassadors, with few negative responses and many positive ones received. The activity also impacted the ambassadors' own view of science.


  • Open Access

    How to Write a Scientific Lab Report: A Short-Term Intervention for Improving Chemistry Writing Skills

    by Natalia García DoménEch, Adrián Sanz Arjona, Nadezda Prochukhan, Noelle P. Scully, John O’DOnoghue

    Scientific writing is an important skill that students develop during their undergraduate studies. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether developing a short-term intervention through a co-creation process can be effective for improving lab report writing skills and evaluate whether this approach is effective. The length and extent of interventions can often be dictated by the resources available at a particular institution. Exploring the effectiveness of short-term interventions co-created with students and lab Demonstrators may lead to wider adoption, particularly at institutions where longer-term interventions may not be possible. Initial work here involves consultations with students and lab Demonstrators to identify common problem areas and a review of how students currently develop report writing skills. The development of an in-person tutorial and a reference guide are both presented here, as well as feedback received from the lab Demonstrators and two different cohorts of students.


  • Open Access

    Current Chemistry Investigators (CCI): Development and Evaluation of a Scientist in a Classroom Electrochemistry Workshop

    by John O’dOnoghue, Natalia García Doménech, Fiona McArdle, Mary Connolly, Yvonne Lang, Niamh McGoldrick

    Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, school students suffered from a reduction in opportunities to connect with higher education institutions, meet scientific role models in person, discuss scientific career options, and carry out hands-on practical laboratory activities. Current Chemistry Investigators (CCI) is a successful electrochemistry-based STEM career intervention program, developed and evaluated through a co-creation process with teachers and students. The goals of CCI are 2-fold: first, to provide school students with career advice through tangible scientific role models and, second, to provide real-world context for the fundamentals of electrochemistry through hands-on activities. Herein, the development of a novel electro-analytical workshop from concept through to delivery with over a thousand students having taken part to date is reported. Students are tasked with solving why a battery malfunctioned through quantitative and qualitative analyses of an electrolyte using conductivity meters. Student feedback is also gathered anonymously through the use of a classroom response system (also known as "clickers"). Together with feedback from teachers, a robust evaluation is presented to measure the impact of providing tangible scientific role models and the usefulness of the workshop.


  • Open Access

    Introducing Materials Science: Experimenting with Magnetic Nanomaterials in the Undergraduate Chemistry Laboratory

    by Annie Regan, John O’dOnoghue, Carl Poree, Peter W. Dunne

    Materials science research has expanded significantly in recent years; a multidisciplinary field, home to an ever-growing number of chemists. However, our general chemistry degree courses have not changed to reflect the rise in interest in this topic. In this paper, we propose a laboratory experiment for the undergraduate chemistry practical course, which may serve as a hands-on introduction to this field. The experiment involves the synthesis and characterization of magnetic materials via commonly employed techniques in materials science. Students begin by producing three metal ferrite spinels using a sol-gel combustion synthesis. They must then characterize the differing magnetic properties across their three samples using a magnetic susceptibility balance. In the second part of the experiment, students must create a ferrofluid via coprecipitation, from which they may observe the phenomenon of "spiking" in response to an external magnet. Additional data such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images corresponding to these materials are also provided, and students are tasked with the interpretation of these data in their writeup report. Upon completion, students should gain a new-found understanding of materials science and its fundamental overlap with chemistry.