Benjamin Chalopin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Benjamin Chalopin has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Caroline Bodet-Milin
Nantes Université, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
2 shared publications - Clément Bailly
Nuclear Medicine Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France; Nantes Université, Inserm, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
2 shared publications - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes Cedex 1, France
2 shared publications - Michel Chérel
Université d’Angers, CRCI2NA
2 shared publications - Patricia Remaud-Le Saëc
CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France
2 shared publications - Sébastien Gouard
Université de Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, CRCINA, F-44000 Nantes, France
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
ImmunoPET in Multiple Myeloma—What? So What? Now What?
Despite constant progress over the past three decades, multiple myeloma (MM) is still an incurable disease, and the identification of new biomarkers to better select patients and adapt therapy is more relevant than ever. Recently, the introduction of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (including direct-targeting mAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors) appears to have changed the paradigm of MM management, emphasizing the opportunity to cure MM patients through an immunotherapeutic approach. In this context, immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET), combining the high sensitivity and resolution of a PET camera with the specificity of a radiolabelled mAb, holds the capability to cement this new treatment paradigm for MM patients. It has the potential to non-invasively monitor the distribution of therapeutic antibodies or directly monitor biomarkers on MM cells, and to allow direct observation of potential changes over time and in response to various therapeutic interventions. Tumor response could, in the future, be anticipated more effectively to provide individualized treatment plans tailored to patients according to their unique imaging signatures. This work explores the important role played by immunotherapeutics in the management of MM, and focuses on some of the challenges for this drug class and the significant interest of companion imaging agents such as immunoPET.
Open AccessImmunoPET in Multiple Myeloma—What? So What? Now What?
Despite constant progress over the past three decades, multiple myeloma (MM) is still an incurable disease, and the identification of new biomarkers to better select patients and adapt therapy is more relevant than ever. Recently, the introduction of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (including direct-targeting mAbs and immune checkpoint inhibitors) appears to have changed the paradigm of MM management, emphasizing the opportunity to cure MM patients through an immunotherapeutic approach. In this context, immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET), combining the high sensitivity and resolution of a PET camera with the specificity of a radiolabelled mAb, holds the capability to cement this new treatment paradigm for MM patients. It has the potential to non-invasively monitor the distribution of therapeutic antibodies or directly monitor biomarkers on MM cells, and to allow direct observation of potential changes over time and in response to various therapeutic interventions. Tumor response could, in the future, be anticipated more effectively to provide individualized treatment plans tailored to patients according to their unique imaging signatures. This work explores the important role played by immunotherapeutics in the management of MM, and focuses on some of the challenges for this drug class and the significant interest of companion imaging agents such as immunoPET.
- Open Access
- 24 May 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2564
What is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between 89Zr- and 64Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model
Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a promising technique in multiple myeloma (MM), the development of other radiopharmaceuticals seems relevant. CD138 is currently used as a standard marker for the identification of myeloma cells and could be used in phenotype tumor imaging. In this study, we used an anti-CD138 murine antibody (9E7.4) radiolabeled with copper-64 (64Cu) or zirconium-89 (89Zr) and compared them in a syngeneic mouse model to select the optimal tracers for MM PET imaging. Then, 9E7.4 was conjugated to TE2A-benzyl isothiocyanate (TE2A) and desferrioxamine (DFO) chelators for 64Cu and 89Zr labeling, respectively. 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 antibodies were evaluated by PET imaging and biodistribution studies in C57BL/KaLwRij mice bearing either 5T33-MM subcutaneous tumors or bone lesions and were compared to 18F-FDG-PET imaging. In biodistribution and PET studies, 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 displayed comparable good tumor uptake of subcutaneous tumors. On the bone lesions, PET imaging with 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 showed higher uptake than with 18F-FDG-PET. Comparison of both 9E7.4 conjugates revealed higher nonspecific bone uptakes of 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 than 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4. Because of free 89Zr’s tropism for bone when using 89Zr-anti-CD138, 64Cu-anti-CD138 antibody had the most optimal tumor-to-nontarget tissue ratios for translation into humans as a specific new imaging radiopharmaceutical agent in MM.
- 24 May 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 20 (10) , 2564
Open AccessWhat is the Best Radionuclide for Immuno-PET of Multiple Myeloma? A Comparison Study Between 89Zr- and 64Cu-Labeled Anti-CD138 in a Preclinical Syngeneic Model
Although positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a promising technique in multiple myeloma (MM), the development of other radiopharmaceuticals seems relevant. CD138 is currently used as a standard marker for the identification of myeloma cells and could be used in phenotype tumor imaging. In this study, we used an anti-CD138 murine antibody (9E7.4) radiolabeled with copper-64 (64Cu) or zirconium-89 (89Zr) and compared them in a syngeneic mouse model to select the optimal tracers for MM PET imaging. Then, 9E7.4 was conjugated to TE2A-benzyl isothiocyanate (TE2A) and desferrioxamine (DFO) chelators for 64Cu and 89Zr labeling, respectively. 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 antibodies were evaluated by PET imaging and biodistribution studies in C57BL/KaLwRij mice bearing either 5T33-MM subcutaneous tumors or bone lesions and were compared to 18F-FDG-PET imaging. In biodistribution and PET studies, 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 displayed comparable good tumor uptake of subcutaneous tumors. On the bone lesions, PET imaging with 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4 and 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 showed higher uptake than with 18F-FDG-PET. Comparison of both 9E7.4 conjugates revealed higher nonspecific bone uptakes of 89Zr-DFO-9E7.4 than 64Cu-TE2A-9E7.4. Because of free 89Zr’s tropism for bone when using 89Zr-anti-CD138, 64Cu-anti-CD138 antibody had the most optimal tumor-to-nontarget tissue ratios for translation into humans as a specific new imaging radiopharmaceutical agent in MM.