Władysław Szempliński
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Władysław Szempliński has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Krzysztof Józef Jankowski
Department of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
3 shared publications - Bogdan Dubis
Department of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 8, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
2 shared publications - Dariusz Załuski
Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
1 shared publication Jakub Idźkowski
Chair of Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Heweliusza 1, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
1 shared publicationJustyna Nowak
1 shared publicationKarolina Szymańska
Chair of Food Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Heweliusza 1, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 May 2019
- Published by Wiley in GCB Bioenergy
- Vol. 11 (10) , 1187-1201
Biomass production and energy balance of Miscanthus over a period of 11 years: A case study in a large‐scale farm in Poland
Giant miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef and Deuter) and Amur silver grass (Miscanthus sacchariflorus Maxim./Hack) are rhizomatous grasses with a C4 photosynthetic pathway that are widely cultivated as energy crops. For those species to be successfully used in bioenergy generation, their yields have to be maintained at a high level in the long term. The biomass yield (fresh and dry matter [DM] yield) and energy efficiency (energy inputs, energy output, energy gain, and energy efficiency ratio) of giant miscanthus and Amur silver grass were compared in a field experiment conducted in 2007–2017 in North‐Eastern Poland. Both species were characterized by high above‐ground biomass yields, and the productive performance of M. × giganteus was higher in comparison with M. sacchariflorus (15.5 vs. 9.3 Mg DM ha−1 year−1 averaged for 1–11 years of growth). In the first year of the experiment, the energy inputs associated with the production of M. × giganteus and M. sacchariflorus were determined at 70.5 and 71.5 GJ/ha, respectively, and rhizomes accounted for around 78%–79% of total energy inputs. In the remaining years of cultivation, the total energy inputs associated with the production of both perennial rhizomatous grasses reached 13.6–15.7 (M. × giganteus) and 16.9–17.5 GJ ha−1 year−1 (M. sacchariflorus). Beginning from the second year of cultivation, mineral fertilizers were the predominant energy inputs in the production of M. × giganteus (78%–86%) and M. sacchariflorus (80%–82%). In years 2–11, the energy gain of M. × giganteus reached 50 (year 2) and 264–350 GJ ha−1 year−1 (years 3–11), and its energy efficiency ratio was determined at 4.7 (year 2) and 18.6–23.3 (years 3–11). The energy gain and the energy efficiency ratio of M. sacchariflorus biomass in the corresponding periods were determined at 87–234 GJ ha−1 year−1 and 6.1–14.3, respectively. Both grasses are significant and environmentally compatible sources of bioenergy, and they can be regarded as potential energy crops for Central‐Eastern Europe.
- 4 May 2019
- Published by Wiley in GCB Bioenergy
- Vol. 11 (10) , 1187-1201
Open AccessBiomass production and energy balance of Miscanthus over a period of 11 years: A case study in a large‐scale farm in Poland
Giant miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef and Deuter) and Amur silver grass (Miscanthus sacchariflorus Maxim./Hack) are rhizomatous grasses with a C4 photosynthetic pathway that are widely cultivated as energy crops. For those species to be successfully used in bioenergy generation, their yields have to be maintained at a high level in the long term. The biomass yield (fresh and dry matter [DM] yield) and energy efficiency (energy inputs, energy output, energy gain, and energy efficiency ratio) of giant miscanthus and Amur silver grass were compared in a field experiment conducted in 2007–2017 in North‐Eastern Poland. Both species were characterized by high above‐ground biomass yields, and the productive performance of M. × giganteus was higher in comparison with M. sacchariflorus (15.5 vs. 9.3 Mg DM ha−1 year−1 averaged for 1–11 years of growth). In the first year of the experiment, the energy inputs associated with the production of M. × giganteus and M. sacchariflorus were determined at 70.5 and 71.5 GJ/ha, respectively, and rhizomes accounted for around 78%–79% of total energy inputs. In the remaining years of cultivation, the total energy inputs associated with the production of both perennial rhizomatous grasses reached 13.6–15.7 (M. × giganteus) and 16.9–17.5 GJ ha−1 year−1 (M. sacchariflorus). Beginning from the second year of cultivation, mineral fertilizers were the predominant energy inputs in the production of M. × giganteus (78%–86%) and M. sacchariflorus (80%–82%). In years 2–11, the energy gain of M. × giganteus reached 50 (year 2) and 264–350 GJ ha−1 year−1 (years 3–11), and its energy efficiency ratio was determined at 4.7 (year 2) and 18.6–23.3 (years 3–11). The energy gain and the energy efficiency ratio of M. sacchariflorus biomass in the corresponding periods were determined at 87–234 GJ ha−1 year−1 and 6.1–14.3, respectively. Both grasses are significant and environmentally compatible sources of bioenergy, and they can be regarded as potential energy crops for Central‐Eastern Europe.
- 1 October 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Industrial Crops and Products
- Vol. 122, 456-464
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) response to different levels of agronomic factors in Poland
- 1 October 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Industrial Crops and Products
- Vol. 122, 456-464
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) response to different levels of agronomic factors in Poland
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Bioresource Technology
- Vol. 243, 731-737
Effect of different nitrogen fertilizer treatments on the conversion of Miscanthus×giganteus to ethanol
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Bioresource Technology
- Vol. 243, 731-737
Effect of different nitrogen fertilizer treatments on the conversion of Miscanthus×giganteus to ethanol