ACAizaz U. Chaudhry

Aizaz U. Chaudhry

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Aizaz U. Chaudhry has a total of 41 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers

    On-Demand Routing in LEO Mega-Constellations With Dynamic Laser Inter-Satellite Links

    by Dhiraj Bhattacharjee, Pablo G. Madoery, Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Halim Yanikomeroglu, Güneş Karabulut Kurt, Peng Hu, Khaled Ahmed, Stéphane Martel

    Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite mega-constellations are beginning to include laser inter-satellite links (LISLs) to extend the Internet to the most remote locations on Earth. Since the process of establishing these links incurs a setup delay on the order of seconds, a static network topology is generally established well in advance, which is then used for the routing calculations. However, this involves keeping links active even when they are not being used to forward traffic, leading to a poor energy efficiency. Motivated by technological advances that are gradually decreasing the LISL setup delays, we foresee scenarios in which it will be possible to compute routes and establish dynamic LISLs on demand. This will require considering setup delays as penalties that will affect the end-to-end latency. In this paper, we present a non-linear optimization model that considers these penalties in the cost function and propose three heuristic algorithms that solve the problem in a tractable way. The algorithms establish different trade-offs in terms of performance and computational complexity. We extensively analyze metrics including average latency, route change rate, outage probability, and jitter, in Starlink's Phase I version 2 constellation. The results show the benefit of adaptive routing schemes according to the link setup delay. In particular, more complex schemes are able to decrease the average end-to-end latency, in exchange for an increase in the execution time. On the other hand, depending on the maximum values of tolerated latency, it is possible to use less computationally complex schemes which will be more scalable for the satellite mega-constellations of the future.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Free-Space Optical (FSO) Satellite Networks Performance Analysis: Transmission Power, Latency, and Outage Probability

    by Jintao Liang, Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Eylem Erdogan, Halim Yanikomeroglu, Gunes Karabulut Kurt, Peng Hu, Khaled Ahmed, Stephane Martel

    In free-space optical satellite networks (FSOSNs), satellites can have different laser inter-satellite link (LISL) ranges for connectivity. As the LISL range increases, the number of satellites from among all the satellites in the constellation that will be needed on the shortest path between a source and a destination ground station decrease, and thereby the number of the LISLs on the shortest path decreases. Greater LISL ranges can reduce network latency of the path but can also result in an increase in transmission power for satellites on the path. Consequently, this tradeoff between satellite transmission power and network latency should be investigated, and in this work we examine it in FSOSNs drawing on the Starlink Phase 1 Version 3 (i.e., the latest version of Starlink's Phase 1) and Kuiper Shell 2 (i.e., Kuiper's biggest shell) constellations for different LISL ranges and different inter-continental connections. We use appropriate system models for calculating the average satellite transmission power (i.e., the average of the transmission power of all satellites on the shortest path) and network latency (i.e., the end-to-end latency of the shortest path). The results show that the mean network latency (i.e., the mean of network latency over all time slots) decreases and mean average satellite transmission power (i.e., the mean of average satellite transmission power over all time slots) increases with an increase in LISL range. For the Toronto–Sydney inter-continental connection in an FSOSN with Starlink's Phase 1 Version 3 constellation, when the LISL range is approximately 2,900 km, the mean network latency and mean average satellite transmission power intersect are approximately 135 ms and 380 mW, respectively. For an FSOSN with the Kuiper Shell 2 constellation in this inter-continental connection, this LISL range is around 3,800 km, and the two parameters are approximately 120 ms and 700 mW, respectively. For the Toronto–Istanbul and Toronto–London inter-continental connections, the LISL ranges at the intersection are different and vary from 2,600 km to 3,400 km. Furthermore, we analyze outage probability performance of optical uplink/downlink due to atmosphere attenuation and turbulence.


  • Open Access

    Latency Versus Transmission Power Trade-Off in Free-Space Optical (FSO) Satellite Networks With Multiple Inter-Continental Connections

    by Jintao Liang, Aizaz U. Chaudhry, John W. Chinneck, Halim Yanikomeroglu, Gunes Karabulut Kurt, Peng Hu, Khaled Ahmed, Stéphane Martel

    In free-space optical satellite networks (FSOSNs), satellites connected via laser inter-satellite links (LISLs), latency is a critical factor, especially for long-distance inter-continental connections. Since satellites depend on solar panels for power supply, power consumption is also a vital factor. We investigate the minimization of total network latency (i.e., the sum of the network latencies of all inter-continental connections in a time slot) in a realistic model of a FSOSN, the latest version of the Starlink Phase 1 Version 3 constellation. We develop mathematical formulations of the total network latency over different LISL ranges and different satellite transmission power constraints for multiple simultaneous inter-continental connections. We use practical system models for calculating network latency and satellite optical link transmission power, and we formulate the problem as a binary integer linear program. The results reveal that, for satellite transmission power limits set at 0.5 W, 0.3 W, and 0.1 W, the average total network latency for all five inter-continental connections studied in this work levels off at 339 ms, 361 ms, and 542 ms, respectively. Furthermore, the corresponding LISL ranges required to achieve these average total network latency values are 4500 km, 3000 km, and 1731 km, respectively. Different limitations on satellite transmission power exhibit varying effects on average total network latency (over 100 time slots), and they also induce differing changes in the corresponding LISL ranges. In the absence of satellite transmission power constraints, as the LISL range extends from the minimum feasible range of 1575 km to the maximum feasible range of 5016 km, the average total network latency decreases from 589 ms to 311 ms.


  • Laser Intersatellite Link Range in Free-Space Optical Satellite Networks: Impact on Latency

    by Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Guillaume Lamontagne, Halim Yanikomeroglu

    Laser communication terminals for establishing laser inter-satellite links (LISLs) are in high demand by companies like SpaceX and Telesat, who want to equip their satellites with LISLs to realize free-space optical satellite networks (FSOSNs). Such terminals offer LISLs with ranges spanning from 4,500 km to 45,000 km. How does LISL range affect network latency in FSOSNs? To investigate this effect, we employ the satellite constellation for Phase I of SpaceX's Starlink, and examine six different LISL ranges for satellites in this constellation in three different scenarios for long-distance inter-continental data communications. We observe that the satellite connectivity and thereby the network connectivity improves with an increase in the LISL range as more and farther satellites become available within the LISL range of a satellite. A higher LISL range leads to better shortest paths offering lower average network latency. Furthermore, improvement in average network latency with increase in LISL range is seen in all scenarios.


  • Future Space Networks: Toward the Next Giant Leap for Humankind

    by Mohammed Y. Abdelsadek, Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Tasneem Darwish, Eylem Erdogan, Gunes Karabulut-Kurt, Pablo G. Madoery, Olfa Ben Yahia, Halim Yanikomeroglu

    Due to the unprecedented advances in satellite fabrication and deployment, innovative communications and networking technologies, ambitious space projects and programs, and the resurgence of interest in satellite networks, there is a need to redefine space networks (SpaceNets) to incorporate all of these evolutions. This paper introduces a vision for future SpaceNets that considers advances in several related domains. First, we present a reference architecture that captures the various network entities and terminals in a holistic manner. Based on this, space, air, and ground use cases are studied. Then, the architectures and technologies that enable the envisaged SpaceNets are investigated. In so doing, we highlight the activities and projects of different standardization bodies, satellite operators, and national organizations towards the envisioned SpaceNets. Finally, the challenges, potential solutions, and open issues from communications and networking perspectives are discussed.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Temporary Laser Inter-Satellite Links in Free-Space Optical Satellite Networks

    by Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Halim Yanikomeroglu

    Laser inter-satellite links (LISLs) between satellites in a free-space optical satellite network (FSOSN) can be divided into two classes: permanent LISLs (PLs) and temporary LISLs (TLs). TLs are not desirable in next-generation FSOSNs (NG-FSOSNs) due to high LISL setup time, but they may become feasible in next-next-generation FSOSNs (NNG-FSOSNs). Using the satellite constellation for Phase I of Starlink, we study the impact of TLs on network latency in an NG-FSOSN (which has only PLs) versus an NNG-FSOSN (which has PLs and TLs) under different long-distance inter-continental data communications scenarios, including Sydney–Sao Paulo, Toronto–Istanbul, Madrid–Tokyo, and New York–Jakarta, and different LISL ranges for satellites, including 659.5 km, 1,319 km, 1,500 km, 1,700 km, 2,500 km, 3,500 km, and 5,016 km. It is observed from the results that TLs provide higher satellite connectivity and thereby higher network connectivity, and they lead to lower average network latency for the NNG-FSOSN compared to the NG-FSOSN in all scenarios at all LISL ranges. In comparison with the NG-FSOSN, the improvement in latency with the NNG-FSOSN is significant at LISL ranges of 1,500 km, 1,700 km, and 2,500 km, where the improvement is 16.83 ms, 23.43 ms, and 18.20 ms, respectively, for the Sydney–Sao Paulo inter-continental connection. For the Toronto–Istanbul, Madrid–Tokyo, and New York–Jakarta inter-continental connections, the improvement is 14.58 ms, 23.35 ms, and 23.52 ms, respectively, at the 1,700 km LISL range.


  • When to Crossover From Earth to Space for Lower Latency Data Communications?

    by Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Halim Yanikomeroglu

    For data communications over long distances, optical wireless satellite networks (OWSNs) can offer lower latency than optical fiber terrestrial networks (OFTNs). However, when is it beneficial to switch or crossover from an OFTN to an OWSN for lower latency data communications? In this article, we introduce a crossover function that enables to find the crossover distance, i.e., a distance between two points on the surface of the Earth beyond which switching or crossing over from an OFTN to an OWSN for data communications between these points is useful in terms of latency. Numerical results reveal that a higher refractive index of optical fiber (or $i$) in an OFTN and a lower altitude of satellites (or $h$) in an OWSN result in a shorter crossover distance. To account for the variation in the end-to-end propagation distance that occurs over the OWSN, we examine the crossover function in four different scenarios. Numerical results indicate that the crossover distance varies with the end-to-end propagation distance over an OWSN and is different for different scenarios. We calculate the average crossover distance over all scenarios for different $h$ and $i$ and use it to evaluate the simulation results. Furthermore, for a comparative analysis of OFTNs and OWSNs in terms of latency, we study three different OFTNs having different refractive indexes and three different OWSNs having different satellite altitudes in three different scenarios for long-distance intercontinental data communications, including connections between New York and Dublin, Sao Paulo and London, and Toronto and Sydney. All three OWSNs offer better latency than OFTN2 (with $i_{2}$ = 1.3) and OFTN3 (with $i_{3}$ = 1.4675) in all scenarios. For example, for Toronto–Sydney connection, OWSN1 (with $h_{1}$ = 300 km), OWSN2 (with $h_{2}$ = 550 km), and OWSN3 (with $h_{3}$ = 1100 km) perform better than OFTN2 by 18.11%, 16.08%, and 10.30%, respectively, while they provide an improvement in latency of 27.46%, 25.67%, and 20.54%, respectively, compared to OFTN3. OWSN1 performs better than OFTN1 (with $i_{1}$ = 1.1) for Sao Paulo–London and Toronto–Sydney connections by 2.23% and 3.22%, respectively, while OWSN2 outperforms OFTN1 for Toronto–Sydney connection by 0.82%. For New York–Dublin connection, all OWSNs while for Sao Paulo–London connection, OWSN2 and OWSN3 exhibit higher latency than OFTN1 as the corresponding average crossover distances are greater than the shortest terrestrial distances between cities in these scenarios. Multiple satellites (or laser intersatellite links) on its shortest paths drive up the propagation distance to the extent that OWSN3 ends up with a higher latency than OFTN1 for the Toronto–Sydney intercontinental connection scenario although the related average crossover distance is less than the shortest terrestrial distance between Toronto and Sydney. The challenges related to OWSNs and OFTNs that may arise from this work in future are also highlighted.


  • Open Access

    Using machine learning to find the hidden relationship between RTT and TCP throughput in WiFi

    by Aizaz U. Chaudhry

    Is it possible to find hidden relationships among variables in WiFi network usingmachine learning(ML)? Can we use ML to find a variable that significantly affects the TCP throughput in WiFi? In this work, we employ a publicly available WiFi dataset to investigate these questions. We use ML techniques, includingprincipal component analysis (PCA),linear regression(LR), andrandom forest(RF), to study the effect of link speed, received signal strength,round-trip time(RTT), and number of available access points on TCP throughput in WiFi. More specifically, we are interested in employing ML to find the variable that most accurately predicts and thereby most significantly affects the throughput. Simple correlation analysis indicates that a combination of multiple variables is more likely to act as a reasonable predictor of the throughput, whereas a single variable, such as RTT, alone is not likely to predict the throughput with reasonable accuracy. From PCA, thefirst principal component(PC1) is seen as highly correlated to RTT. During predictive analysis, it is observed that the LR model is unable to find any hidden relationship between throughput and other variables. However, the RF model discovers that RTT explains the variation in throughput more closely and as such it predicts the throughput more accurately compared to other variables. PC1 captures nearly all of the variation in throughput with the RF model and predicts throughput with very high accuracy, which indirectly confirms RTT as the variable that most significantly affects the TCP throughput in WiFi. Consequently, we discover a very close relationship between RTT and TCP throughput using appropriate ML techniques, and these results can be helpful in developing a better understanding of the relationship between latency and throughput for designing future low-latency networks.


  • Top Cited Papers

    Laser Intersatellite Links in a Starlink Constellation: A Classification and Analysis

    by Aizaz U. Chaudhry, Halim Yanikomeroglu

    Laser intersatellite links (LISLs) are envisioned between satellites in upcoming satellite constellations, such as the one in phase I of SpaceX's Starlink. Within a constellation, satellites can establish LISLs with other satellites in the same orbital plane (OP) or in different OPs. We present a classification of LISLs based on the location of satellites within a constellation and of LISLs' duration. Then, using the satellite constellation for phase I of Starlink, we study the effect that varying a satellite's LISL range has on the number of different types of LISLs it can establish with other satellites. In addition to permanent LISLs, we observe a significant number of temporary LISLs between satellites in crossing OPs. Such LISLs can play a vital role in achieving low-latency paths within next-generation optical wireless satellite networks.