Alex Friedlaender

Ampullary carcinoma (AC) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy with dual intestinal and pancreatobiliary differentiation, complicating diagnosis, staging, and treatment. This review synthesizes current epidemiology, pathology, and multi-omic data to outline a pragmatic care pathway: lineage-first at presentation, mutation-fast at progression. Histology remains the primary classifier: the intestinal subtype generally aligns with colorectal regimens, whereas pancreatobiliary and mixed subtypes favor pancreaticobiliary therapy. In selected fit patients, modified FOLFIRINOX may address mixed phenotypes. Next-generation sequencing adds precision by identifying therapeutically relevant alterations, including ERBB2/HER2 amplifications, MSI-high/dMMR, BRAF V600E, and rare NTRK or RET fusions, while KRAS mutations are enriched in pancreatobiliary tumors. We recommend early application of a rapid-core panel (KRAS/BRAF, MSI/dMMR, ERBB2/HER2, RNA-based fusions) to capture high-impact targets, followed by comprehensive profiling at first progression. Liquid biopsy, plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), or bile-derived DNA may complement tissue and help identify the dominant lineage. Research priorities include ampulla-enriched umbrella trials, explicit AC subcohorts in tissue-agnostic studies, and ctDNA-informed endpoints. This lineage-first, mutation-fast paradigm supports precision care and evidence generation in AC.

BRAF mutations are critical drivers in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The most common mutation, BRAF V600E, is a key therapeutic target. Targeted treatments with BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in melanoma patients. However, in cancers like metastatic colorectal cancer, BRAF mutations are associated with poor outcomes due to aggressive disease behavior and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Despite progress, resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors remains a major challenge, often driven by secondary mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, activation of alternative pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks)/protein kinase B (AKT), or changes in the tumor microenvironment. These challenges have motivated ongoing research into combining BRAF inhibitors with immunotherapies to enhance and prolong treatment effectiveness. Future research must also account for the role of the cancer’s tissue of origin, as the biological context significantly influences response to targeted therapies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of tumor biology, micro-environment, and genetics.

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, steering the focus from conventional, organ-specific protocols to precision medicine. Emerging targeted therapies offer a cutting-edge approach to cancer treatment, while companion diagnostics play an essential role in aligning therapeutic choices with specific molecular changes identified through NGS. Despite these advances, interpreting the clinical implications of a rapidly expanding catalog of genetic mutations remains a challenge. The selection of therapies in the presence of multiple mutations requires careful clinical judgment, supported by quality-centric genomic testing that emphasizes actionable mutations. Molecular tumor boards can play an increasing role in assimilating genomic data into clinical trials, thereby refining personalized treatment approaches and improving patient outcomes.

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death across the world. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most frequent type of lung cancer and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Stage III NSCLC, which encompasses 30% of cases, refers to a state between localized and metastatic disease, and is associated with poor prognosis. As highlighted in this review, stage III represents a heterogenous group, whose complex management includes multimodal treatment, discussed below, and requires discussion in multidisciplinary teams. The goal of this approach is a maximalist attitude in these patients with locally advanced and non-metastatic disease. However, many issues remain under debate including the optimal sequences of treatment between different treatment modalities, patient selection particularly for surgery, the duration of perioperative treatments and the identification of biomarkers to determine which patients might benefit of specific treatment like immunotherapy and targeted therapies. This review describes the current landscape of management of stage III NSCLC, discussing the critical issue of resectability, and highlighting the recent advancements in the field, particularly the incorporation of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies in this setting.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) account for 20% of sarcomatous tumors and 1−2% of primary gastrointestinal cancers. When localized and operable, GISTs have a favorable prognosis with a five-year overall survival of around 80%. In the metastatic setting, the prognosis is poor with limited therapeutic options. Standard treatments include four tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for _KIT_-mutated GIST and one for _PDGFRA_-mutated GIST. The evolution of molecular oncology and the widespread use of next-generation sequencing have already allowed new therapeutic approaches and are expected to lead to further treatment options. The emergence of resistance due to secondary mutations caused by selective pressure from TKIs remains a significant challenge. Tailoring treatments through repeated biopsies and non-invasive liquid biopsies at progression could be a promising approach. Ongoing investigations into new molecules with broader KIT inhibition may also reshape the treatment landscape. Finally, combination therapies may overcome the emergence of resistance mechanisms. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology and biology of GISTs and explores current and future management options.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the treatment of various malignancies, with preclinical studies showing improved immune responses in the preoperative setting. FDA-approved neoadjuvant-immunotherapy-based approaches include triple-negative breast cancer and early non-small cell lung cancer on the basis of improvement in pathological response and event free survival. Nevertheless, current trials have only shown benefits in a fraction of patients. It is therefore crucial to identify predictive biomarkers to improve patient selection for such approaches. This review aims to provide an overview of potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer, bladder cancer, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer. By the extrapolation of the metastatic setting, we explore known predictive biomarkers, i.e., PD-L1, mismatch repair deficiency and tumour mutational burden, as well as potential early-disease-specific biomarkers. We also discuss the challenges of identifying reliable biomarkers and the need for standardized protocols and guidelines for their validation and clinical implementation.

GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) represent 20% of sarcomatous tumors and 1–2% of primary gastrointestinal cancers. They have an excellent prognosis when localized and resectable, though their prognosis is poor in the metastatic setting, with limited options after the second line until recently. Four lines are now standard in KIT-mutated GIST and one in PDGFRA-mutated GIST. An exponential growth of new treatments is expected in this era of molecular diagnostic techniques and systematic sequencing. Currently, the main challenge remains the emergence of resistance linked to secondary mutations caused by selective pressure induced by TKIs. Repeating biopsies to tailor treatments might be a step in the right direction, and liquid biopsies at progression may offer a non-invasive alternative. New molecules with wider KIT inhibition are under investigation and could change the catalog and the sequence of existing treatments. Combination therapies may also be an approach to overcome current resistance mechanisms. Here, we review the current epidemiology and biology of GIST and discuss future management options, with an emphasis on genome-oriented therapies.