Hongmei Lu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Hongmei Lu has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Yanliu Lin
Utrecht University
6 shared publications - Shan Zhou
Department of Political Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
3 shared publications - Audrey L. Mayer
School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
2 shared publications - Adam M. Wellstead
Department of Social Sciences Michigan Technological University Houghton Michigan USA
1 shared publication Adam Wellstead
College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
1 shared publicationAngie Carter
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
Chinese Collaborative Planning in the Digital Era
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
Open AccessChinese Collaborative Planning in the Digital Era
- Open Access
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 150-170
Governance Models of Community Gardens in Urban China
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 150-170
Open AccessGovernance Models of Community Gardens in Urban China
- Open Access
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 28-47
Social Media and Public Spheres in China
- 24 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 28-47
Open AccessSocial Media and Public Spheres in China
- 17 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Vol. 28 (4) , 1-20
Community garden coproduction under collectivism
- 17 December 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
- Vol. 28 (4) , 1-20
Community garden coproduction under collectivism
- Open Access
- 2 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Urban Science
- Vol. 9 (12) , 512
Highway as Barriers to Park Visitation: A Fixed Effects Analysis Using Mobility Data
Urban parks provide critical benefits for public health, mental well-being, and social connection. However, inequities in park access and use persist, particularly among socially and economically vulnerable populations. While previous studies have established that segregation and social vulnerability each contribute to uneven park access, little is known about how these two forces interact to shape real visitation patterns. This study addresses this research gap and answers the research question: How does highway segregation relate to differences in the different aspects of social vulnerability in influencing park access across Austin’s east–west divide? SafeGraph mobility data from 2019 and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which included four themes (i.e., socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status and language, and housing and transportation characteristics), were analyzed through fixed-effects regression models for Austin, Texas. Results show that household composition and minority vulnerabilities have negative associations with park visitation, indicating that areas with more elderly, single-parent, or minority residents visit parks less frequently. Interaction terms reveal that highway segregation functions as a structural barrier that conditions the influence of social vulnerability on park use. Those associated with socioeconomic resources diminish, while the disadvantages linked to household composition and minority status intensify on the east side of I-35, reflecting the cumulative effects of segregation and infrastructural division. These findings confirm that inequities in park access are more pronounced on the east side of the I-35, consistent with the highway’s role in reinforcing segregation. Efforts to strengthen connectivity represent key strategies for advancing equitable park visitation across Austin.
- 2 December 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Urban Science
- Vol. 9 (12) , 512
Open AccessHighway as Barriers to Park Visitation: A Fixed Effects Analysis Using Mobility Data
Urban parks provide critical benefits for public health, mental well-being, and social connection. However, inequities in park access and use persist, particularly among socially and economically vulnerable populations. While previous studies have established that segregation and social vulnerability each contribute to uneven park access, little is known about how these two forces interact to shape real visitation patterns. This study addresses this research gap and answers the research question: How does highway segregation relate to differences in the different aspects of social vulnerability in influencing park access across Austin’s east–west divide? SafeGraph mobility data from 2019 and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which included four themes (i.e., socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status and language, and housing and transportation characteristics), were analyzed through fixed-effects regression models for Austin, Texas. Results show that household composition and minority vulnerabilities have negative associations with park visitation, indicating that areas with more elderly, single-parent, or minority residents visit parks less frequently. Interaction terms reveal that highway segregation functions as a structural barrier that conditions the influence of social vulnerability on park use. Those associated with socioeconomic resources diminish, while the disadvantages linked to household composition and minority status intensify on the east side of I-35, reflecting the cumulative effects of segregation and infrastructural division. These findings confirm that inequities in park access are more pronounced on the east side of the I-35, consistent with the highway’s role in reinforcing segregation. Efforts to strengthen connectivity represent key strategies for advancing equitable park visitation across Austin.
- Open Access
- 30 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Planning Practice & Research
- p. 1-23
To participate online or onsite? Public preferences for participating in neighborhood regeneration planning in China
- 30 November 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Planning Practice & Research
- p. 1-23
Open AccessTo participate online or onsite? Public preferences for participating in neighborhood regeneration planning in China
- Open Access
- 19 March 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Rural Studies
- Vol. 107
Social determinants of rural food security: Findings from Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- 19 March 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Rural Studies
- Vol. 107
Open AccessSocial determinants of rural food security: Findings from Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- Open Access
- 6 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Cleaner Waste Systems
- Vol. 5
Learning from failure: Breaking the waste incineration NIMBY cycle through participatory governance
- 6 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Cleaner Waste Systems
- Vol. 5
Open AccessLearning from failure: Breaking the waste incineration NIMBY cycle through participatory governance