Cheryl R. Ellerbrock

In 2022, middle level education researchers from across the United States and beyond began a multi-stage project that led to an updated research agenda for middle level education researchers and culminated in the publication of 13 literature reviews in 2024–2025 on a vast array of topics. As researchers, we were curious what these reviews revealed about the field of middle level education research. What trends were evident across topics? What gaps remain? Through qualitative content analysis, we identified nine recurring trends, including criticality and power dynamics, middle level teacher identity, and qualitative research methods, as well as nine gaps, including an absence of practical frameworks, weak integration of AI, and a lack of student voice and perspective. This article explores those nine trends and gaps within the current landscape of middle level education and the larger sociopolitical context, identifying areas for future scholarship and areas for growth within middle level preparation programs and advocacy efforts in support of young adolescent learners.

Building on the earlier work of Ellerbrock et al. (2018a), this chapter reviewed literature between 2000 and 2018 that reported on the organizational structures of middle level education settings in the United States of America and Australia. Though the findings highlighted the dearth of research specifically examining the organizational structures of middle level education, the literature examined supported the original three key interconnected themes of people, place, and time (Ellerbrock et al., 2018b) as being key features necessary for the implementation of effective middle schooling practices. In our conclusion, we called for more robust research in this area to guide policy and enact practices across different jurisdictions. At the same time, Bishop and Nagle (2018) noted the many increasing disparities in access to quality education and invited readers to consider how schools can serve all students both equitably and well. Equitable access is first and foremost, but equitable outcomes for all students is paramount. At the time of publication of all of these works, no one could have predicted the significant negative impact of COVID-19 and the resultant exacerbation of the already challenging inequities in education across the globe. However, research over the last five years, and particularly since 2020, has placed a greater focus on policy, system, and grassroots pedagogical changes to bridge this widening gap. In light of this heightened focus, this essay aims to reexamine the three key themes of people, place, and time and, when implemented with integrity, the ways middle grades schools and structures can contribute to creating both developmentally responsive and equitable educational experiences for young adolescent learners.

In this qualitative case study (n = 32), researchers sought to understand the ways a multi-day summer transition camp may help incoming ninth-grade students experience a developmentally responsive transition into high school. The findings revealed camp helped support students’ procedural, social, and academic-related needs and concerns. Learning the school layout and policies helped support students’ procedural-related needs and concerns. Promoting student–student, educator–student, and school–student relationships helped support students’ social-related needs and concerns. Attending academic classes and communicating expectations for academic success helped support students’ academic-related needs and concerns. A summer camp may foster a responsive transition and mitigate school failure, but must be developed and delivered based on students’ developmental and transition-related needs and concerns. Furthermore, students must perceive camp activities as actually supporting their needs and concerns.

AERA Online Paper Repository Viewer

The 2021-2022 school year came with the mantra of "learning loss" and the push to fill in the learning gaps and "accelerate learning" at all costs. In an effort to return education to "normal" and reduce learning loss, what transpired for many was a lack of focus on the students' pandemic experiences and its effect on their lives from a wholistic perspective. Education is at a point where "normal" needs to be redefined to support students' needs and their learning, requiring middle level teachers to be responsive educators. Middle level educators can be responsive to their students' needs by fostering an adolescentcentered community of care. Elements of an adolescent-centered community of care include responsive organizational structures, responsive teacher characteristics and practices grounded in care and advocacy, and positive and supportive peer relationships. This article highlights how one middle level teacher enacted a community of care for her young adolescents to best reach and teach them upon the return to in-person teaching in the COVID-19 pandemic.

This qualitative case study highlights the ways a novice middle school mathematics teacher established an adolescent-centered community of care that set the stage for responsive middle level mathematics teaching (RMLMT). Findings revealed that fostering caring school-based relationships supports the establishment of a responsive classroom environment. This can be achieved through an early and ongoing purposeful focus on teacher-student and student-student relationship development and through nurturing emotional safety. Further, holding a student-centered teaching approach is a way to respect, value, and advocate for young adolescents. This can be achieved by celebrating diversity, supporting academic and personal development, and fostering persistence. Fostering a responsive classroom environment and respecting, valuing, and advocating for young adolescents is foundational to establishing an adolescent-centered community of care in any middle school classroom, especially in a mathematics classroom. Placing an acute focus on culture and community is essential to establishing an adolescent-centered community of care that sets the stage for RMLMT to take place.

Middle level education as a field of study has expanded during the last 30 years to include a growing, international knowledge base. The primary purpose of this review essay is to highlight trends in the extent to which refereed scholarship in the field of middle level education has reflected international content and perspectives during the last 30 years. To accomplish this task, the authors conducted a chronological review of the major refereed publications of the Association for Middle Level Education, Adolescent Success, and the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Middle Level Education Research (MLER) SIG as well as Middle Grades Research Journal and Middle Grades Review. The authors also examined AERA conference programs between 2010 and 2019 for international content and perspectives in MLER SIG sessions. While the authors' primary aim was to understand trends in the geographic scope of scholarship in the field, they also gleaned tentative insights about research approaches, theoretical frameworks, and editorial bias that informed a set of recommendations they offered to advance future international work in middle level education. The recommendations include (a) expanding and strengthening worldwide networks of middle grades scholars; (b) building consensus around a middle grades research agenda that has an international dimension; and (c) promoting and engaging in more international scholarship that is theory-driven, uses rigorous, appropriate comparative methodologies, and draws on perspectives from cultures and countries not well represented in the literature.

In this article, the authors explain the need for clinically rich middle school STEM teacher preparation. They describe how one university and school district with an established partnership collaborated to meet this need. The result was the formation of a residency program that aims to prepare high quality middle school STEM teachers who can fill the district’s vacancies. The residency program is centered around clinical experiences where the triad—consisting of a preservice teacher, collaborating teacher, and university supervisor—is the nexus of learning. The authors share the takeaways from their experiences, highlighting the perspectives of the members of one triad. They conclude with an examination of the residency program’s effectiveness in meeting its intended aim.