Ming-Han Li
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ming-Han Li has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jun-Hyun Kim
Jun-Hyun Kim is Professor, School of Planning, Design and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States
2 shared publications - Gang Chen
College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China
1 shared publication - Jianlong Wang
Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
1 shared publication - Junqi Li
Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China
1 shared publication - Robert D. Brown
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
1 shared publication - Runzi Wang
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 761, 144057
Predicting stream water quality under different urban development pattern scenarios with an interpretable machine learning approach
- 1 March 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 761, 144057
Predicting stream water quality under different urban development pattern scenarios with an interpretable machine learning approach
- Open Access
- 29 July 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 11 (15) , 4096
Landscape Performance for Coordinated Development of Rural Communities & Small-Towns Based on “Ecological Priority and All-Area Integrated Development”: Six Case Studies in East China’s Zhejiang Province
Over the last decade, the Chinese government has focused on addressing development challenges in rural areas. The “Ecological Priority and All-Area Integrated Development” concept was thus developed, and it was found to be crucial for rural areas in Eastern Zhejiang Province. A new comprehensive evaluation system was composed by comparing and synthesizing existing Chinese assessment criteria, and landscape performance metrics developed by the Landscape Architecture Foundation. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method (FCE) were used to conduct post-development evaluation on six cases using the new evaluation system. The results of four cases show that ecology should be considered a high priority when dealing with rural community and small town developments. The other two cases emphasizing infrastructure development verified that “coordinating the development of rural communities and small town area” is crucial for building sustainable and livable rural communities, and avoiding redundancy and inefficiency. The newly developed comprehensive evaluation system integrates existing systems with a broader vision and is more holistic in its objectives for the region. The development-led intervention (based on landscape performance evaluation) is conducive to the implementation of a more scientific and comprehensive development model, with predictable performance.
- 29 July 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 11 (15) , 4096
Open AccessLandscape Performance for Coordinated Development of Rural Communities & Small-Towns Based on “Ecological Priority and All-Area Integrated Development”: Six Case Studies in East China’s Zhejiang Province
Over the last decade, the Chinese government has focused on addressing development challenges in rural areas. The “Ecological Priority and All-Area Integrated Development” concept was thus developed, and it was found to be crucial for rural areas in Eastern Zhejiang Province. A new comprehensive evaluation system was composed by comparing and synthesizing existing Chinese assessment criteria, and landscape performance metrics developed by the Landscape Architecture Foundation. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method (FCE) were used to conduct post-development evaluation on six cases using the new evaluation system. The results of four cases show that ecology should be considered a high priority when dealing with rural community and small town developments. The other two cases emphasizing infrastructure development verified that “coordinating the development of rural communities and small town area” is crucial for building sustainable and livable rural communities, and avoiding redundancy and inefficiency. The newly developed comprehensive evaluation system integrates existing systems with a broader vision and is more holistic in its objectives for the region. The development-led intervention (based on landscape performance evaluation) is conducive to the implementation of a more scientific and comprehensive development model, with predictable performance.
- 1 July 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 242, 403-414
Predicting bioretention pollutant removal efficiency with design features: A data-driven approach
- 1 July 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 242, 403-414
Predicting bioretention pollutant removal efficiency with design features: A data-driven approach
- 1 April 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 236, 365-379
The influence of climate on the effectiveness of low impact development: A systematic review
- 1 April 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 236, 365-379
The influence of climate on the effectiveness of low impact development: A systematic review
- Open Access
Evaluating the Road-Bioretention Strip System from a Hydraulic Perspective—Case Studies
The two-dimensional overland flow simulation program, FullSWOF_2D, was revised to include submodules of determining infiltration by zones (Z) and grate-inlet (G) drainage from a 2D surface to a 1D pipe flow. The updated program, FullSWOF-ZG, was used to evaluate the performance of a road-bioretention strip (RBS) system and explore/understand key parameters of continuous RBS design. The program was validated using eight pervious surfaces under simulated rainfall events and tested with 20 experimental cases of a locally depressed curb inlet. The mean difference of simulated interception efficiencies (36.6%–86.0%) and observed interception efficiencies (34.8%–84.0%) of the curb inlet was 3.5%, which proves the program predicts the curb-inlet interception efficiency accurately. The 20 road-only and 20 RBS modeling cases were designed and modeled using the FullSWOF-ZG program. These case studies have different road lengths, curb inlet lengths, longitudinal slopes, cross slopes, bioretention-overflow inlet heights, and bioretention soil infiltration parameters. Only 34.6%–48.4% of the total runoff volume is intercepted by the RBS’s curb inlet under heavy rainfall (250 mm/h) and the remaining part of the runoff flows downstream along the road, which may cause local inundation and become a safety hazard. The curb inlet becomes the bottleneck of the RBS system that could impede the runoff flowing into the bioretention strip for detention and infiltration to improve the stormwater quality.
Open AccessEvaluating the Road-Bioretention Strip System from a Hydraulic Perspective—Case Studies
The two-dimensional overland flow simulation program, FullSWOF_2D, was revised to include submodules of determining infiltration by zones (Z) and grate-inlet (G) drainage from a 2D surface to a 1D pipe flow. The updated program, FullSWOF-ZG, was used to evaluate the performance of a road-bioretention strip (RBS) system and explore/understand key parameters of continuous RBS design. The program was validated using eight pervious surfaces under simulated rainfall events and tested with 20 experimental cases of a locally depressed curb inlet. The mean difference of simulated interception efficiencies (36.6%–86.0%) and observed interception efficiencies (34.8%–84.0%) of the curb inlet was 3.5%, which proves the program predicts the curb-inlet interception efficiency accurately. The 20 road-only and 20 RBS modeling cases were designed and modeled using the FullSWOF-ZG program. These case studies have different road lengths, curb inlet lengths, longitudinal slopes, cross slopes, bioretention-overflow inlet heights, and bioretention soil infiltration parameters. Only 34.6%–48.4% of the total runoff volume is intercepted by the RBS’s curb inlet under heavy rainfall (250 mm/h) and the remaining part of the runoff flows downstream along the road, which may cause local inundation and become a safety hazard. The curb inlet becomes the bottleneck of the RBS system that could impede the runoff flowing into the bioretention strip for detention and infiltration to improve the stormwater quality.