MLMengrui Li

Mengrui Li

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Mengrui Li has a total of 2 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Tianqi Ao

    State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resource & Hydropower, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu 610065, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xiaodong Li

    State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Comparative Study of Regional Frequency Analysis and Traditional At-Site Hydrological Frequency Analysis

    by Mengrui Li, Xiaodong Li, Tianqi Ao

    Hydrological frequency analysis plays an indispensable role in the construction of national flood control projects. This study selects the stations with the smallest and largest discordances in the nine homogeneous regions of Sichuan Province as the representative stations, and results obtained by regional frequency analysis are compared with those obtained by traditional at-site hydrological frequency analysis. The results showed that the optimal frequency distribution of each representative station obtained by traditional at-site hydrological frequency analysis and the ones of corresponding homogeneous regions obtained by regional frequency analysis were not necessarily consistent, which was related to the site and homogeneous regions. At the same time, there were also differences between the fitting of the theoretical rainstorm frequency curve obtained by the two methods and the observation. In general, in each homogeneous region, the results obtained by regional frequency analysis and traditional at-site hydrological frequency analysis at the stations with the largest frequency analysis were quite different. The design values obtained by the two methods were also increasingly different with the increase of the return period. The study has specific reflections on the differences between regional frequency analysis and traditional at-site hydrological frequency analysis.