Xueping Tao
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xueping Tao has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bangzhu Zhu
School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
2 shared publications Ping Wang
School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publication- Ping Wang
School of Management Jinan University Guangzhou Guangdong China
1 shared publication - Rui Xie
College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32827, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 28 September 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 85 (2) , 793-809
Measuring regional energy efficiencies in China: a meta-frontier SBM-Undesirable approach
- 28 September 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 85 (2) , 793-809
Measuring regional energy efficiencies in China: a meta-frontier SBM-Undesirable approach
- Open Access
- 25 May 2016
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 8 (6) , 506
Measuring the Interprovincial CO2 Emissions Considering Electric Power Dispatching in China: From Production and Consumption Perspectives
How to accurately measure the interprovincial CO2 emissions is key to achieving the task of energy saving and emission reduction. Electric power is very important for economy development. At the same time, the amount of interprovincial electric power dispatching is very large in China, so it is obligatory to measure the CO2 emissions from both electricity production and consumption perspectives. We have measured China's interprovincial CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion during 2000–2014, in which the revised regional electric power CO2 emissions are used to adjust interprovincial CO2 emissions. The obtained results show that: no matter from which perspective one considers the situation, the overall CO2 emissions of China are almost the same amount. From different perspectives, the interprovincial CO2 emissions are different. In terms of the production perspective, CO2 emissions of Beijing, Hebei, Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong are underestimated. However, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Sichuan, Guizhou, and Shaanxi are overestimated. If the electric power dispatching is not considered, it is unfairly portrayed as transferring CO2 emissions from the electricity input provinces to the output ones, because the electricity input provinces enjoy clean energy, but the electricity production ones pay for the environmental pollution.
- 25 May 2016
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 8 (6) , 506
Open AccessMeasuring the Interprovincial CO2 Emissions Considering Electric Power Dispatching in China: From Production and Consumption Perspectives
How to accurately measure the interprovincial CO2 emissions is key to achieving the task of energy saving and emission reduction. Electric power is very important for economy development. At the same time, the amount of interprovincial electric power dispatching is very large in China, so it is obligatory to measure the CO2 emissions from both electricity production and consumption perspectives. We have measured China's interprovincial CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion during 2000–2014, in which the revised regional electric power CO2 emissions are used to adjust interprovincial CO2 emissions. The obtained results show that: no matter from which perspective one considers the situation, the overall CO2 emissions of China are almost the same amount. From different perspectives, the interprovincial CO2 emissions are different. In terms of the production perspective, CO2 emissions of Beijing, Hebei, Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong are underestimated. However, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Sichuan, Guizhou, and Shaanxi are overestimated. If the electric power dispatching is not considered, it is unfairly portrayed as transferring CO2 emissions from the electricity input provinces to the output ones, because the electricity input provinces enjoy clean energy, but the electricity production ones pay for the environmental pollution.