Younghyun Koo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Younghyun Koo has a total of 47 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Maryam Rahnemoonfar
Lehigh University
9 shared publications Hongjie Xie
8 shared publications- Stephen F. Ackley
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
8 shared publications - Heather Regan
Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway
7 shared publications - Hongjie Xie
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio TX USA
7 shared publications - Mukund Gupta
Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Remote Sensing of Environment
- Vol. 349
Characterization of Antarctic iceberg distributions using ICESat-2
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Remote Sensing of Environment
- Vol. 349
Characterization of Antarctic iceberg distributions using ICESat-2
- Open Access
- 3 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 29-38
Uncertainty-Aware Sea-Ice Type Mapping with Multiple Ice Charts
- 3 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 29-38
Open AccessUncertainty-Aware Sea-Ice Type Mapping with Multiple Ice Charts
- Open Access
- 30 September 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Earth Observation
- Vol. 1 (1) , 129-144
Pan-Antarctic evaluation of National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) sea ice drift product using high-resolution SAR and buoy data
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d −1 , particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (−6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d −1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼ 1 km d −1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- 30 September 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Earth Observation
- Vol. 1 (1) , 129-144
Open AccessPan-Antarctic evaluation of National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) sea ice drift product using high-resolution SAR and buoy data
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d −1 , particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (−6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d −1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼ 1 km d −1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Remote Sensing of Environment
- Vol. 344
Seasonal mass balance of Hofsjökull ice cap, Iceland, estimated from repeat ICESat-2 satellite altimetry
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Remote Sensing of Environment
- Vol. 344
Seasonal mass balance of Hofsjökull ice cap, Iceland, estimated from repeat ICESat-2 satellite altimetry
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Characterization of Antarctic iceberg distributions using ICESat-2
Monitoring the thickness, volume, and morphology of Antarctic icebergs is essential to quantifying their role as major freshwater contributors to the Southern Ocean. Iceberg morphology provides critical indicators of calving mechanics and structural evolution, offering key insights into how climate forcing influences iceberg formation and distribution. In this study, we construct a comprehensive Antarctic iceberg database using high-resolution, precise freeboard measurements from the ICESat-2 satellite altimeter. Based on geometric height profiles, we classify and analyze the spatiotemporal distribution of Antarctic icebergs across four structural categories: dome-shaped, sloping, tabular, and complex icebergs. From 2019 to 2023, the West Pacific Ocean (WPO) sector shows the largest number of icebergs, followed by the Amundsen-Bellingshausen Seas (ABS), Ross Sea (RS), Weddell Sea (WS), and Indian Ocean (IO) sectors. Morphological distributions reveal strong regional signatures: dome icebergs dominate in the ABS and RS (35–45 %), whereas tabular icebergs are most prevalent in the WS and IO (~50 %). The WPO exhibits a distinct composition characterized by high proportions of dome (40–45 %) and complex (15–20 %) icebergs. The WS and IO sectors are further distinguished by giant tabular icebergs exceeding 10 km in width and a lower mean thickness (less than 200 m) compared to other sectors (200–250 m). Our database reveals that tabular icebergs account for over 70 % of the total freshwater mass stored in icebergs, followed by dome icebergs (~20 %). This dataset provides a robust baseline for evaluating macro-scale iceberg distributions and their hydrological impacts.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessCharacterization of Antarctic iceberg distributions using ICESat-2
Monitoring the thickness, volume, and morphology of Antarctic icebergs is essential to quantifying their role as major freshwater contributors to the Southern Ocean. Iceberg morphology provides critical indicators of calving mechanics and structural evolution, offering key insights into how climate forcing influences iceberg formation and distribution. In this study, we construct a comprehensive Antarctic iceberg database using high-resolution, precise freeboard measurements from the ICESat-2 satellite altimeter. Based on geometric height profiles, we classify and analyze the spatiotemporal distribution of Antarctic icebergs across four structural categories: dome-shaped, sloping, tabular, and complex icebergs. From 2019 to 2023, the West Pacific Ocean (WPO) sector shows the largest number of icebergs, followed by the Amundsen-Bellingshausen Seas (ABS), Ross Sea (RS), Weddell Sea (WS), and Indian Ocean (IO) sectors. Morphological distributions reveal strong regional signatures: dome icebergs dominate in the ABS and RS (35–45 %), whereas tabular icebergs are most prevalent in the WS and IO (~50 %). The WPO exhibits a distinct composition characterized by high proportions of dome (40–45 %) and complex (15–20 %) icebergs. The WS and IO sectors are further distinguished by giant tabular icebergs exceeding 10 km in width and a lower mean thickness (less than 200 m) compared to other sectors (200–250 m). Our database reveals that tabular icebergs account for over 70 % of the total freshwater mass stored in icebergs, followed by dome icebergs (~20 %). This dataset provides a robust baseline for evaluating macro-scale iceberg distributions and their hydrological impacts.
- Open Access
- 27 May 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Comment on egusphere-2026-1703
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- 27 May 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2026-1703
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- Open Access
- 13 May 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Comment on egusphere-2026-1703
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- 13 May 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2026-1703
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- Open Access
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Uncertainty assessment of Antarctic sea ice motion product at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
- Vol. 2026, 1-23
Open AccessUncertainty assessment of Antarctic sea ice motion product at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)
The recent historic minima in Antarctic sea ice extent suggest the possibility of new thermodynamic and dynamic conditions across the Southern Ocean. In investigating these thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice behaviors, it is essential to observe sea ice drift with high quality. However, while the relatively abundant and reliable buoy data in the Arctic guarantees a robust Arctic sea ice drift observation, the Antarctic sea ice drift product merely relies on passive microwave (PMW) data due to the lack of pan-Antarctic drifting buoy data. In this study, we assess the uncertainty of the Antarctic sea ice drift product from 2015 to 2023 by using drifting buoys in the Weddell Sea and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sea ice drift across the Southern Ocean. The comparison between PMW and buoy ice drift shows that PMW-derived sea ice drift tends to underestimate drift speed by 2–3 km d-1, particularly under low ice concentration conditions, while drift direction agrees well with a marginal bias. Based on the accurate high-resolution sea ice drift estimation from SAR imagery (-6° of angle difference and 0.1 km d-1 of speed difference with buoy ice drift), we assess the pan-Antarctic uncertainties of PMW sea ice drift. We found a widespread ∼11 km d-1 underestimation of ice drift speed across the Southern Ocean, particularly in the east Weddell Sea and west Ross Sea. Ice drift direction generally shows negligible bias across the Southern Ocean, but the east Weddell Sea shows 10–20° of clockwise bias. Such a wide underestimation is attributed to the optimal interpolation that smooths ice velocity and raises uncertainties around the marginal ice zone. Based on this understanding of PMW-derived Antarctic sea ice drift estimation, it is important to improve the sea ice velocity estimation in the Southern Ocean.