Duccio Conti

Activation of PLK1, a master mitotic kinase, requires phosphorylation of its activation segment on Thr210, within a basic consensus sequence for Aurora kinases. Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation of Thr210 has been reported, but other evidence identified a strict requirement for the Aurora A partner Bora for Thr210 phosphorylation. Here, we investigate the elusive mechanistic basis for this requirement. We show that Aurora A:Bora phosphorylates Thr210 of PLK1 in vitro. On the contrary, T210 was not phosphorylated by isolated Aurora A, additional Aurora A:activator complexes, or Aurora B:INCENP, even when used at high kinase/substrate ratios. A transient interaction of Bora and PLK1, identified by structural modeling and probed mutationally, is uniquely required for Thr210 phosphorylation. Dependency on Bora for Thr210 phosphorylation is eliminated after mutating Lys208, in the Aurora consensus, into arginine. This conservative mutation turns PLK1 into a substrate of nearly all tested active Aurora kinases, including Aurora B. Collectively, these results shine a new light on the specificity of the PLK1 activation mechanism.

Activation of PLK1, a master mitotic kinase, requires phosphorylation of its activation segment on Thr210, within a basic consensus sequence for Aurora kinases. Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation of Thr210 has been reported, but other evidence identified a strict requirement for the Aurora A partner Bora for Thr210 phosphorylation. Here, we investigate the elusive mechanistic basis for this requirement. We show that Aurora A:Bora phosphorylates Thr210 of PLK1 in vitro, while Aurora A, other Aurora A:activator complexes, and Aurora B:INCENP fail to target T210 even at high kinase/substrate ratios. A transient interaction of Bora and PLK1, identified by structural modelling and probed mutationally, is uniquely required for Thr210 phosphorylation. Dependency on Bora for Thr210 phosphorylation is eliminated after mutating Lys208, in the Aurora consensus, into arginine. This conservative mutation turns PLK1 into an excellent substrate of nearly all tested active Aurora kinases, especially Aurora B. Collectively, these results shine a new light on the specificity of the PLK1 activation mechanism.

The centromere, a chromosome locus defined by the histone H3–like protein centromeric protein A (CENP-A), promotes assembly of the kinetochore to bind microtubules during cell division. Centromere maintenance requires CENP-A to be actively replenished by dedicated protein machinery in the early G ₁ phase of the cell cycle to compensate for its dilution after DNA replication. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) limit CENP-A deposition to once per cell cycle and function as negative regulators outside of early G ₁ . Antithetically, Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) promotes CENP-A deposition in early G ₁ , but the molecular details of this process are still unknown. We reveal here a phosphorylation network that recruits PLK1 to the deposition machinery to control a conformational switch required for licensing the CENP-A deposition reaction. Our findings clarify how PLK1 contributes to the epigenetic maintenance of centromeres.

Condensin complexes promote the drastic spatial rearrangement of the genome upon mitotic entry. Condensin II initiates chromosome condensation in early mitosis. To prevent chromosome condensation during interphase, condensin II is inhibited by MCPH1, but the mechanism is unknown. Through genetic and proteomic approaches, we identify M18BP1, a protein previously associated with centromere identity, as a factor required for condensin II localization to chromatin. M18BP1 directly binds condensin II’s CAP-G2 subunit and competes with MCPH1 for binding. Upon mitotic entry, CDK1 mediated phosphorylation may promote a switch from MCPH1 to M18BP1 binding to activate condensin II. Our results identify a fundamental and evolutionarily conserved mechanism of condensin II activation.

The centromere, a chromosome locus defined by the histone H3-like protein CENP-A, seeds the kinetochore to bind microtubules during cell division. Centromere maintenance requires CENP-A to be actively replenished by dedicated protein machinery in the early G1 cell-cycle phase, compensating for its two-fold dilution following DNA replication. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) limit CENP-A deposition to once per cell cycle and function as negative regulators outside early G1. Antithetically, Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) promotes CENP-A deposition in early G1, but the molecular details are still unknown. We reveal a phosphorylation network that recruits PLK1 to the deposition machinery to control a conformational switch required for licensing the CENP-A deposition reaction. Our findings solve the long-standing question of how PLK1 contributes to the epigenetic maintenance of centromeres. One-Sentence Summary PLK1 licenses epigenetic maintenance of centromeres by regulating a conformational switch on the MIS18α protein.

Proper chromosome segregation is crucial for cell division. In eukaryotes, this is achieved by the kinetochore, an evolutionarily conserved multiprotein complex that physically links the DNA to spindle microtubules and takes an active role in monitoring and correcting erroneous spindle–chromosome attachments. Our mechanistic understanding of these functions and how they ensure an error-free outcome of mitosis is still limited, partly because we lack a complete understanding of the kinetochore structure in the cell. In this study, we use single-molecule localization microscopy to visualize individual kinetochore complexes in situ in budding yeast. For major kinetochore proteins, we measured their abundance and position within the metaphase kinetochore. Based on this comprehensive dataset, we propose a quantitative model of the budding yeast kinetochore. While confirming many aspects of previous reports based on bulk imaging, our results present a unifying nanoscale model of the kinetochore in budding yeast.

Defects in chromosome-microtubule attachment can cause chromosomal instability (CIN), frequently associated with infertility and aggressive cancers. Chromosome-microtubule attachment is mediated by a large macromolecular structure, the kinetochore. Sister kinetochores of each chromosome are pulled by microtubules from opposing spindle-poles, a state called biorientation which prevents chromosome missegregation. Kinetochore-microtubule attachments that lack the opposing-pull are detached by Aurora-B/Ipl1. It is unclear how mono-oriented attachments that precede biorientation are spared despite the lack of opposing-pull. Using an RNAi-screen, we uncover a unique role for the Astrin-SKAP complex in protecting mono-oriented attachments. We provide evidence of domains in the microtubule-end associated protein that sense changes specific to end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments and assemble an outer-kinetochore crescent to stabilise attachments. We find that Astrin-PP1 and Cyclin-B-CDK1 pathways counteract each other to preserve mono-oriented attachments. Thus, CIN prevention pathways are not only surveying attachment defects but also actively recognising and stabilising mature attachments independent of biorientation.

Defects in chromosome-microtubule attachment can cause chromosomal instability, associated with infertility and aggressive cancers. Chromosome-microtubule attachment is mediated by a large macromolecular structure, the kinetochore. Kinetochore pairs are bioriented and pulled by microtubules from opposing spindle poles to ensure the equal segregation of chromosomes. Kinetochore-microtubule attachments lacking opposing-pull are detached by Aurora-B/Ipl1; yet, how mono-oriented attachments that are a prerequisite for biorientation, but lacking opposing-pull are spared is unclear. Using an RNAi-mediated screen, we uncover a unique role for the Astrin-SKAP complex in protecting mono-oriented attachments. We provide the first evidence for how a microtubule-end associated protein senses outer-kinetochore changes specific to end-on attachments and assembles into an outer kinetochore crescent to stabilise mature attachments. We find that Astrin-PP1 and Cyclin-B-CDK1 activities counteract each other to preserve mono-oriented attachments. Thus, cells are not only surveying chromosome-microtubule attachment errors, but they are also actively sensing and stabilising mature attachments independent of biorientation.

Microtubules segregate chromosomes by attaching to macromolecular kinetochores. Only microtubule-end attached kinetochores can be pulled apart; how these end-on attachments are selectively recognised and stabilised is not known. Using the kinetochore and microtubule-associated protein, Astrin, as a molecular probe, we show that end-on attachments are rapidly stabilised by spatially-restricted delivery of PP1 near the C-terminus of Ndc80, a core kinetochore-microtubule linker. PP1 is delivered by the evolutionarily conserved tail of Astrin and this promotes Astrin’s own enrichment creating a highly-responsive positive feedback, independent of biorientation. Abrogating Astrin:PP1-delivery disrupts attachment stability, which is not rescued by inhibiting Aurora-B, an attachment destabiliser, but is reversed by artificially tethering PP1 near the C-terminus of Ndc80. Constitutive Astrin:PP1-delivery disrupts chromosome congression and segregation, revealing a dynamic mechanism for stabilising attachments. Thus, Astrin-PP1 mediates a dynamic ‘lock’ that selectively and rapidly stabilises end-on attachments, independent of biorientation, and ensures proper chromosome segregation.