Antonio Tanzilli

BACKGROUND Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Given its substantial burden, quality of life has become a key outcome in cancer care and research. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to assess quality of life. Although qualitative research is essential for establishing PROM content validity, patient narratives are less often collected and analysed systematically once PROMs are implemented. Adding open-ended responses to quantitative PROM data may provide policy-relevant insights into what patients themselves prioritise. OBJECTIVE This study has aimed to identify the factors that people living with or beyond cancer across Europe perceive as having the greatest impact on their quality of life. METHODS Following a pan-European validation study of the newly developed EUonQoL-Kit – a set of questionnaires designed to assess the quality of life of people living with or beyond cancer in Europe – the responses to the final open-ended question “Having completed the questionnaire, what do you feel most impacts your quality of life?” were collected. Responses underwent qualitative thematic analysis using a coding framework iteratively developed and interpreted by researchers and people with lived experience of cancer involved as ‘co-researchers’. RESULTS Of the 4,284 cancer patients and survivors participating in the EUonQoL-Kit validation study, 3,350 (78.2%) provided a response to the final open-ended question. Factors perceived as having the greatest impact on quality of life were categorised into 23 distinct themes, covering six overarching domains: Physical health, Psychological wellbeing, Social health, Overall health, Healthcare experience and Environment. The most frequently reported factors included physical symptoms, overall health, relationships and connectivity, emotions and feelings, and impact of care pathway. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive overview of the factors that impact quality of life most in people living with or beyond cancer across Europe. Combining structured PROMs with open-ended patient input may support more patient-centred quality of life measurement and interpretation and help align care and policy priorities with what matters most to patients.

Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) represents one of the most common and debilitating effects in patients surviving after cancer treatments. Neurocognitive deficits are important causes of disability and burden in cancer survivors. The true magnitude of CRCI is difficult to define due to significant heterogeneity of literature data. At present, there is no agreement on the gold standard for detection and grading of CRCI in clinical trials, and there is a lack of clear knowledge of its pathophysiology. Objectives: In this review, we aim to discuss some perspectives for future research to pursue in order to cover the gaps in knowledge in the CRCI field. Methods: We focused our literature research on the following relevant issues: neuroradiological correlates of CRCI; objective neuropsychological evaluation and subjective complaint assessment and their correlation with objective measures; timing of assessment; and possible treatments. Results: The correct methodology for evaluating cognitive deficits induced by anti-tumor treatments still requires a definition based on quality scientific evidence, and literature data are currently scarce. Conclusions: This review highlights the need for further research to understand the causes and consequences of cancer-related cognitive impairment using standardized and sensitive measures of cognitive functions and the long-term effects of chemotherapy on cognitive functions and to develop effective interventions.

Aim: There is little consensus on salvage management of glioblastoma after recurrence, for lack of evidence. Materials & methods: A retrospective study of treatments in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Results: Surgery at recurrence was related to better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Surgery at recurrence, Karnofsky index, MGMT methylation status, younger age at diagnosis and number of chemotherapy cycles were positive factors for OS and PFS. The benefit of OS was relevant for a second surgery performed at least 9 months after the first one. Systemic treatments after the second surgery were linked to an improved PFS. Conclusion: Younger age, Karnofsky index, MGMT methylation status and a median time between surgeries >= 9 months may be criteria for eligibility for surgery at recurrence.

Background End-of-life in patients with brain cancer presents special challenges, and palliative care approach is underutilized. Patients with brain cancer, in the last months of life, receive frequent hospital readmissions, highlighting bad end-of-life care quality. Early integration of palliative care improves quality of care in advanced stage of disease and patient’s quality of death. Purpose We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of patients with brain cancer discharged after diagnosis to evaluate pattern of treatment and rate of hospital readmission in the last months of life. Design Data were collected from the Lazio Region Healthcare database. Setting Adult patients discharged with diagnosis ICD-9 191.* between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019 were included. Results A total of 6672 patients were identified, and 3045 deaths were included. In the last 30 days 33% were readmitted to the hospital and 24.2% to the emergency room. 11.7% were treated with chemotherapy and 6% with radiotherapy. Most indicators of end-of-life care showed wide variability by hospital of discharge. Conclusions Strategies to improve quality of care at the end of life and to decrease re-hospitalization and futile treatments are becoming increasingly important to improve quality of death and reduce healthcare costs. Variability observed by hospital of discharge indicates the lack of a standard approach to end-of-life care.

Background WHO grade II and III meningiomas are more invasive than grade I malignancies and determine patients’ shorter overall survival. Their tendency to recur after treatment has represented an important therapeutic challenge because of the limited treatment strategies at recurrence. Angiogenesis and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation are two of the main features of higher grade meningiomas, determining invasiveness and tendency to relapse. While these options prove promising, available clinical data on mTOR inhibitors’ efficacy are somewhat limited. Case study We report a case of a 25-year-old female patient diagnosed with a right parasagittal occipital anaplastic meningioma (grade III WHO) in 2013. The patient underwent multiple treatments and, in 2019, a further recurrence occurred. The patient reported an mTOR mutation, and it is for this reason that the MTB approved treatment with everolimus and bevacizumab. Therapy was administered in May 2019, and partial response and prolonged disease control was obtained in November 2021, when progression took place. The patient’s death occurred in March 2022. Conclusions This case report provides evidence on the efficacy of mTOR inhibitors as a treatment option in recurrent meningiomas. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of performing a molecular analysis as a preliminary step towards targeting the mTOR pathway.

Background The majority of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) experience disease progression. At recurrence, treatment options have limited efficacy. Many studies report a limited and short duration response rate. Although clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for providing evidence on efficacy of specific treatment strategies, real-world data can be considered more representative of the “real” GBM population. Objective To describe the management of GBM recurrence in a large real-world sample. Methods We analysed retrospectively the data stored in the database of the Neuro-oncology Unit, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. We considered only data of patients with histological diagnosis of GBM and disease recurrence during their follow-up. We excluded patients who did not receive treatment after the diagnosis. Results We analysed 422 patients (64% males, 36% females) with a mean age of 59.6 (range 16–87) years. At GBM recurrence, 135 (32.0%) patients underwent palliative care, and 287 (68.0%) underwent other treatments. Patients on palliative care were older, had a worse performance status, and a shorter time between GBM diagnosis and its recurrence. Patients who received chemotherapy in combination with other treatments (surgery and/or radiation therapy) at GBM recurrence had a longer survival than those in palliative care (p < 0.001). Surgery or radiation therapy alone did not have any effect on survival as compared with palliative care (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study confirms the importance of a multidisciplinary approach even at GBM recurrence, suggesting that combination treatments play a key role in management of disease.

Background The BNT162b2 vaccine conferred 95% protection against COVID-19 in people aged 16 years or older. Objective The aim of this observational study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of vaccine in patients affected by primary brain tumor (PBT). Methods We proposed COVID-19 vaccine to all patients affected by PBT followed by Neuroncology Unit of National Cancer Institute Regina Elena. Results 102 patients received the first dose, 100 the second, and 73 patients received the booster dose. After first dose, we observed one patient with fever and severe fatigue, while after the second one, we recorded adverse events in ten patients. No correlation was observed between adverse events and comorbidities. Conclusions The COVID-19 vaccine is safe and well tolerated in PBT patients.

Aim: We performed longitudinal evaluations of the neurocognitive status in glioma patients to describe possible variations over the course of illness. Materials and methods: Glioma patients underwe... Plain language summary Malignant gliomas are brain tumors with dismal prognosis that can affect patients’ neurocognitive status. We performed longitudinal neuropsychological assessments to describe...

One of the key difficulties in glioma treatment is our limited ability to consistently assess cancer response or progression either by neuroimaging or specific blood biomarkers. An ideal biomarker could be measured through non-invasive methods such as blood-based biomarkers, aiding both early diagnosis and monitoring disease evolution. This is a single-center, case-control, 10-year retrospective, longitudinal study. We evaluated routine coagulation factors in 138 glioma patients (45 Females/93 Males; median [range] age, 56.4 [27-82] years; 64 non-recurrent/74 recurrent) and, for comparison, in 56 relapsing-remitting MS patients (41 Females/15 Males; 40.8 [25-62] years, 35 stable/21 active) and 23 controls (16 Females/7 Males; 41.7 [24-62] years) as well as Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in subgroups of 127 glioma patients, 33 MS patients and 23 healthy controls. Secondly, we assessed whether these indicators could be predictive of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioma patients. NLR, d-dimer, Antithrombin III and Factor VIII were significantly higher in glioma patients compared to both MS patients and controls (p<0.0001 for all). ROC curves confirmed that either NLR, Antithrombin III or Factor VIII were moderately accurate biomarkers (0.7<AUC<0.9) for glioma patients compared to other two groups whereas d-dimer was a moderately accurate marker for glioma only when compared to controls. In multivariable analysis, NLR ≥ 4.3 (median) (HR 1.53 [95 % CI 1.04-2.26], p=0.03) together with the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 80 (median) (0.46 [0.31-0.69], p<0.0001) and use of steroids (1.75 [1.19-2.57], p=0.004) resulted independent predictors of OS while only KPS was independently associated with PFS. Our study showed increased levels of either NLR, Antithrombin III, Factor VIII, or d-dimer in glioma patients compared to MS patients and controls, where the first three represented moderately accurate biomarkers for this cancer. Among these markers, only NLR was found to be predictive for OS along with severe disability and steroid therapy.

Purpose Patients with relapse of recurrent glioma have a poor outcome and limited treatment options. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical benefit and tolerability of weekly intravenous administration of carboplatin-based monotherapy in adult glioma patients who had progressed from previous chemotherapy lines based on temozolomide and nitrosoureas. Methods This was a single-arm, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included progressive or recurrent glioma after radiotherapy and chemotherapy-based treatments and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 60. Results Thirty-two patients (median age 43.5 years) were enrolled to receive weekly carboplatin monotherapy in an intravenous method of administration. The median duration of response was 7.3 months with an overall disease control rate of 31.3%. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months while overall survival was 5.5 months. Pre-treatment with corticosteroids (i.e. dexamethasone) was associated to clinical benefit in 43.8% of patients. Patients achieving clinical benefit exhibited a longer progression-free survival (4.6 vs. 1.5 months; p > 0.001) and overall survival (7.9 vs. 3.2 months; p = 0.041) compared with those not achieving clinical benefit. Conclusions Our findings show that single agent, weekly, intravenous administration of carboplatin may have a role in patients with recurrent glioma and suggest that pre-treatment with corticosteroids may confer survival benefit.