Evanthia Galanis

Systemic treatments are limited for patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery or radiation. Loss of NF2 and CDKN2A/ CDKN2B is common in higher-grade meningiomas and promotes progression in preclinical models. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, as one arm of the Alliance umbrella trial A071401, a genomically driven phase 2 study in recurrent and progressive meningiomas. Eligible patients with grade 2 or 3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate as defined by local review; the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. The success threshold for PFS6 was 8 or more of 24 patients; for the response rate, it was 3 or more of 24 patients. Ninety-six patients were screened and 36 patients received treatment. The mean number of treatment cycles was nine and the median follow-up was 21 months. The first 24 patients who met the eligibility criteria and began treatment could be evaluated for the primary endpoint. The observed PFS6 rate was 58% (14 of 24 patients, 95% confidence interval = 37–78%), thus meeting the PFS6 criteria for promising activity. The best response was stable disease in 16 of 24 patients. Of the 36 patients who started treatment, nine had a grade 3 and two had grade 4 adverse events at least possibly related to treatment. Grade 4 toxicities included alanine aminotransferase elevation (1), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (1) and vomiting (1). The trial met its primary endpoint. Abemaciclib was well tolerated and resulted in improved PFS6. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for patients with progressive grade 2 or 3 meningiomas harboring NF2 or CDK pathway alterations. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02523014 .

Background: Meningiomas lack effective therapies for recurrent or aggressive disease. NF2 inactivation, commonly in meningioma, may sensitize tumors to FAK inhibition and interact with MAPK signaling. This study investigated the therapeutic activity of defactinib (FAK inhibitor) and avutometinib (RAF/MEK inhibitor) alone and in combination in preclinical meningioma models. Methods: MAPK-altered meningioma cell lines, IOMM-Lee (NF2 wild-type, BRAF p.V600E) and CH157-MN (NF2 mutant, NRAS p.Q61K), BenMen-1 (NF2 mutant, MAPK wild-type), and three patient-derived NF2 mutant cell lines were cultured in matrigel and treated with defactinib and avutometinib in 3D cell viability assays. In vivo, flank and intracranial xenograft models of IOMM-Lee and CH157-MN were treated with VS-4718 (FAK inhibitor, superior pharmokinetics in mice), avutometinib, or combination. Tumor growth, survival, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties were assessed. Results: In vitro, combination therapy showed synergistic or additive effects in CH157-MN and IOMM-Lee cells, respectively. Defactinib alone demonstrated activity in NF2-mutant patient-derived and BenMen-1 cells, while avutometinib did not. In vivo, avutometinib monotherapy suppressed tumor growth and extended survival in both flank and intracranial xenograft models, with evidence of favorable pharmacokinetic properties and target pathway inhibition in intracranial tumors. Combination therapy provided enhanced and sustained control of flank CH157-MN meningioma compared to avutometinib alone but did not significantly improve survival over avutometinib alone in intracranial models. Conclusions: Avutometinib demonstrated robust anti-tumor effects in flank and intracranial models of MAPK-altered meningioma. Combination benefits were context dependent. Defactinib activity in NF2-mutant patient-derived cells without targetable MAPK-kinase alterations highlights the importance of genomic biomarkers to guide personalized strategies.

Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.

The Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) marks its 30th anniversary in 2025, providing an opportunity to reflect on scientific advances and future directions in the field. Over 3 decades, SNO has catalyzed scientific innovation, education, mentorship, and global collaboration, advancing the care of patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Through its annual meeting and subspecialty conferences in pediatric neuro-oncology and brain metastases, as well as its journals, including Neuro-Oncology, Neuro-Oncology Practice, Neuro-Oncology Advances, and the recently launched Neuro-Oncology Pediatrics, SNO has established leading platforms for disseminating knowledge, sharing best practices, and shaping clinical, translational, and basic research worldwide. Scientific milestones during this period include the integration of molecular profiling into central nervous system tumor classification, advances in neuroimaging for diagnosis and treatment monitoring, targeted therapies for selected glioma patients, and the evolution of brain metastases management from whole-brain radiotherapy to multimodal strategies that incorporate targeted and immune-based therapies. Pediatric neuro-oncology has similarly advanced with the use of histomolecular diagnostics, refined risk stratification, and the development of novel targeted agents, alongside an increased emphasis on survivorship. Looking forward, emerging insights into the tumor microenvironment and novel immunotherapeutic approaches offer promising directions for future discovery and translation.

Background: Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results: Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions: This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.

This review explores the pivotal role of preanalytical variables in bringing liquid biopsy approaches into the clinic for brain tumors. Preanalytical variables encompass a range of critical issues, from blood sample collection and handling to the impact of tumor heterogeneity and patient-specific factors. These variables introduce challenges such as false positives, false negatives, and variability in the analysis of tumor signals, which can hinder the diagnostic and prognostic utility of liquid biopsies. Understanding the nuances of preanalytical variables is essential for the successful implementation of liquid biopsy in clinical settings. This paper delves into strategies aimed at mitigating the influence of preanalytical variables by emphasizing the importance of standardized sample collection protocols, optimized sample processing and storage, quality control measures, and the integration of multiple liquid biopsy modalities.

Glioblastoma is the most common type of malignant primary brain tumor and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In 2021, the World Health Organization updated the classification of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors to restrict glioblastomas to isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) tumors, improving understanding of the prognosis and optimal therapy for these tumors. This revision also enables more homogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, facilitating the evaluation of novel therapies. In this updated consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of patients with glioblastoma is discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as immunotherapies, viral therapies, targeted molecular therapies, theranostics, and antibody–drug conjugates will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.