Sarah G. Moxon

Objectives: The aim of this study was to prioritise a set of indicators to measure World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-care standards for small and/or sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. The hypothesis is that monitoring prioritised indicators can support accountability mechanisms, assess and drive progress, and compare performance in quality-of-care (QoC) at subnational levels. Design: Prospective, iterative, deductive, stepwise process to prioritise a list of QoC indicators organised around the WHO Standards for improving the QoC for small and sick newborns in health facilities . A technical working group (TWG) used an iterative four-step deductive process: (1) articulation of conceptual framework and method for indicator development; (2) comprehensive review of existing global SSNB-relevant indicators; (3) development of indicator selection criteria; and (4) selection of indicators through consultations with a wide range of stakeholders at country, regional and global levels. Setting: The indicators are prioritised for inpatient newborn care (typically called level 2 and 3 care) in high mortality/morbidity settings, where most preventable poor neonatal outcomes occur. Participants: The TWG included 24 technical experts and leaders in SSNB QoC programming selected by WHO. Global perspectives were synthesised from an online survey of 172 respondents who represented different countries and levels of the health system, and a wide range of perspectives, including ministries of health, research institutions, technical and implementing partners, health workers and independent experts. Results: The 30 prioritised SSNB QoC indicators include 27 with metadata and 3 requiring further development; together, they cover all eight standard domains of the WHO quality framework. Among the established indicators, 10 were adopted from existing indicators and 17 adapted. The list contains a balance of indicators measuring inputs (n=6), processes (n=12) and outcome/impact (n=9). Conclusions: The prioritised SSNB QoC indicators can be used at health facility, subnational and national levels, depending on the maturity of a country’s health information system. Their use in implementation, research and evaluation across diverse contexts has the potential to help drive action to improve quality of SSNB care. WHO and others could use this list for further prioritisation of a core set.

The emergency obstetric care (EmOC) monitoring framework has been used for decades to monitor the availability and use of EmOC services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). EmOC monitoring is based around eight signal functions, a shortlist of key clinical interventions capable of averting deaths from the main direct causes of maternal mortality, categorised between two levels of care: basic and comprehensive, with a newborn resuscitation signal function added in 2009. The Re-Visioning Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Project (2020–2024) aimed to update the EmOC approach to reflect new knowledge in maternal and newborn health (MNH), and to expand the scope of the original EmOC monitoring framework. The project used technical workstreams and workshops to arrive at new proposals. This paper reports on the approach used to build consensus on a revised set of EmONC signal functions and levels of care. Using a three-round online Delphi approach, consensus (≥85%) was sought from a diverse panel of global MNH experts on EmONC signal functions and their placement at different levels of care, based on existing evidence-based guidelines. The process was iterative, each round building on the previous, and embedded in the wider Re-Visioning EmONC project; the output from each round involved coordination of inputs from multiple tiers of technical experts, including UN agencies, via technical expert groups, workstreams and workshops. The Delphi study recruited 113 experts in MNH from a range of geographic and economic settings, specialities and professions, including clinical, academic and programme expertise. The output from the three rounds included substantial convergence, resulting in set of 25 signal functions (11 obstetric, 13 neonatal and 1 referral) that reflect the spectrum of EmONC required for women and newborns. The revised EmONC signal functions are intended as a simple approach to allow health system managers to visualise their EmONC services, and as a means to hold health systems accountable to provide the main interventions to avert preventable maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, and stillbirths.

Introduction Neonatal sepsis is a key contributor to neonatal mortality worldwide, and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are disproportionately affected. With antimicrobial resistance challenging effective treatment of neonatal sepsis, it is increasingly urgent to improve infection prevention and control (IPC) in LMIC neonatal units (NNU) and reduce transmission of infections. One pathway to improvement which merits further exploration is the collaboration with families to build an IPC intervention. Families are constantly present on neonatal units, and much of the hands-on care for their newborns is given by them. For IPC to be effective, families must adhere to IPC standards within the NNU, but furthermore, any IPC intervention implemented must be feasible and acceptable for families as well as the hospital staff as this will increase uptake and effectiveness of the intervention. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of parental involvement in infection prevention and control in low- and middle-income setting neonatal units. Methods and analysis This protocol was developed in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. Searches will be carried out on six databases (Medline, CINAHL, Global Health, EMBASE, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus), and reference searching will be carried out on included studies. The search will be carried out from 2000 to present (end date 28/02/2024), and included languages will be English, French, Spanish and Portuguese. Screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer to resolve conflicts. Results will be reported by narrative synthesis of each sub-question in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Ethics and dissemination This study will be carried out using already published data exclusively and therefore does not require further ethical approval. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations and through engagement with peers and relevant stakeholders. Trial registration number Registered with Open Science Framework - https://osf.io/snc7a/?view_only=8ffc39d837594b4388c7394a838c3a9e

Objective: To prospectively document experiences of frontline maternal and newborn healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Cross-sectional study via an online survey disseminated through professional networks and social media in 12 languages. We analysed responses using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis disaggregating by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). Setting: 81 countries, between March 24 and April 10, 2020. Participants: 714 maternal and newborn healthcare providers. Main outcome measures: Preparedness for and response to COVID-19, experiences of health workers providing care to women and newborns, and adaptations to 17 outpatient and inpatient care processes during the pandemic. Results: Only one third of respondents received training on COVID-19 from their health facility and nearly all searched for information themselves. Half of respondents in LMICs received updated guidelines for care provision compared with 82% in HICs. Overall, only 47% of participants in LMICs, and 69% in HICs felt mostly or completely knowledgeable in how to care for COVID-19 maternity patients. Facility-level responses to COVID-19 (signage, screening, testing, and isolation rooms) were more common in HICs than LMICs. Globally, 90% of respondents reported somewhat or substantially higher levels of stress. There was a widespread perception of reduced use of routine maternity care services, and of modification in care processes, some of which were not evidence-based. Conclusions: Substantial knowledge gaps exist in guidance on management of maternity cases with or without COVID-19. Formal information sharing channels for providers must be established and mental health support provided. Surveys of maternity care providers can help track the situation, capture innovations, and support rapid development of effective responses. Key Messages: What is already known: In addition to lack of healthcare worker protection, staffing shortages, heightened risk of nosocomial transmission and decreased healthcare use described in previous infectious disease outbreaks, maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic has also been affected by large-scale lockdowns/curfews. The two studies assessing the indirect effects of COVID-19 on maternal and child health have used models to estimate mortality impacts. Experiences of frontline health professionals providing maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been empirically documented to date. What this study adds: Respondents in high-income countries more commonly reported available/updated guidelines, access to COVID-19 testing, and dedicated isolation rooms for confirmed/suspected COVID-19 maternity patients. Levels of stress increased among health professionals globally, including due to changed working hours, difficulties in reaching health facilities, and staff shortages. Healthcare providers were worried about the impact of rapidly changing care practices on health outcomes: reduced access to antenatal care, fewer outpatient visits, shorter length-of-stay in facilities after birth, banning birth companions, separating newborns from COVID-19 positive mothers, and postponing routine immunisations. COVID-19 illustrates the susceptibility of maternity care services to emergencies, including by reversing hard-won gains in healthcare utilisation and use of evidence-based practices. These rapid findings can inform countries of the main issues emerging and help develop effective responses.

In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of “signal functions” has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked. Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: “routine care at birth”, “special care” and “intensive care”. We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics. Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as “routine care at birth,” three interventions as “special care” and one as “intensive care”. Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents’ classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions. Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.

Each year an estimated 2.6 million newborns die, mainly from complications of prematurity, neonatal infections, and intrapartum events. Reducing these deaths requires high coverage of good quality care at birth, and inpatient care for small and sick newborns. In low- and middle-income countries, standardised measurement of the readiness of facilities to provide emergency obstetric care has improved tracking of readiness to provide care at birth in recent years. However, the focus has been mainly on obstetric care; service readiness for providing inpatient care of small and sick newborns is still not consistently measured or tracked. We reviewed existing international guidelines and resources to create a matrix of the structural characteristics (infrastructure, equipment, drugs, providers and guidelines) for service readiness to deliver a package of inpatient care interventions for small and sick newborns. To identify gaps in existing measurement systems, we reviewed three multi-country health facility survey tools (the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment, the Service Provision Assessment and the Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Assessment) against our service readiness matrix. For service readiness to provide inpatient care for small and sick newborns, our matrix detailed over 600 structural characteristics. Our review of the SPA, the SARA and the EmONC assessment tools identified several measurement omissions to capture information on key intervention areas, such as thermoregulation, feeding and respiratory support, treatment of specific complications (seizures, jaundice), and screening and follow up services, as well as specialised staff and service infrastructure. Our review delineates the required inputs to ensure readiness to provide inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Based on these findings, we detail where questions need to be added to existing tools and describe how measurement systems can be adapted to reflect small and sick newborns interventions. Such work can inform investments in health systems to end preventable newborn death and disability as part of the Every Newborn Action Plan.

Globally, complications of prematurity are the leading cause of death in children under five. Preterm infants who survive their first month of life are at greater risk for various diseases and impairments in infancy, childhood and later life, representing a heavy social and economic burden for families, communities and health and social systems. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is recommended as a beneficial and effective intervention for improving short- and long-term preterm birth outcomes in low- and high-income settings. Nevertheless, KMC is not as widely used as it should be. The International Network on KMC runs biennial workshops and congresses to help improve the coverage and quality of KMC worldwide. This paper reports the results of the two-day workshop held in November 2016, where 92 participants from 33 countries shared experiences in a series of round tables, group work sessions and plenaries. Barriers to and enablers of KMC are discussed with regard to parents, health workers and the health system. Key factors for effective implementation and uptake relate to appropriate training for health staff, adherence to protocols and the creation of a welcoming environment for families. Recommendations for planning for national programmes are made according to a six-stage change model. Resources and the cost of making progress are discussed in terms of investment, maintenance, and acceleration and scaling-up costs. KMC training requirements are presented according to three levels of care. To ensure quality KMC, key requisites are proposed for the different KMC components and for sensitive communication with caregivers. The group attending to the monitoring and evaluation of KMC at a national and subnational level highlight the lack of standard indicator definitions. Key priorities for investment include health services research, harmonisation of indicators, development of a costing tool, programming and scaling up, and the follow-up of preterm infants. It is hoped that this report will help to further scale-up and sustain KMC through a systematic approach that includes raising commitment, identifying key strategies to address the main barriers and using existing facilitators, ensuring training and quality, agreeing on indicators for monitoring and evaluation, and advancing implementation research.