Jongyeol Oh
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jongyeol Oh has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bo Mi Gil
Department of Radiology, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Hye Seon Kang
Affiliation Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication - Jeong Uk Lim
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
1 shared publication - Soon Seog Kwon
Division of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
1 shared publication - Yong Hyun Kim
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-10
Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features show better survival and less exacerbations compared to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who show features related to autoimmunity without meeting criteria for a defined connective tissue disease are categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The present study compared clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with IPAF to patients with connective tissue disease related-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). ILD patients who were consecutively enrolled in a single institution ILD cohort between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated for the study. Clinical data had been prospectively collected, while radiologic imaging and pathologic findings were re-reviewed for the present study. Out of 305 patients with ILD, 54 (17.7%) patients met the classification of IPAF, 175 (57.4%) patients had IPF, and 76 (24.9%) patients were diagnosed with CTD-ILD. Compared to IPF, incidences of acute exacerbations in 1,3 and 5 years were significantly less in the IPAF group (p = 0.022, p = 0.026 and p = 0.007, respectively). From multivariate analysis for mortality, age (p = 0.034, HR 1.022, 95% CI: 1.002–1.044), FVC (p < 0.001, HR 0.970, 95% CI: 0.955–0.984), ILD exacerbation (p = 0.001, HR 2.074, 95% CI: 1.366–3.148), and ILD type (p = 0.047, HR 0.436, 95% CI: 0.192–0.984 (IPAF vs IPF), respectively) showed significant association. Compared to the other ILD groups, IPAF showed distinct clinical characteristics. The IPAF group showed better survival and less episodes of exacerbation when compared to the IPF group.
- 4 July 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-10
Open AccessInterstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features show better survival and less exacerbations compared to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who show features related to autoimmunity without meeting criteria for a defined connective tissue disease are categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The present study compared clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with IPAF to patients with connective tissue disease related-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). ILD patients who were consecutively enrolled in a single institution ILD cohort between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated for the study. Clinical data had been prospectively collected, while radiologic imaging and pathologic findings were re-reviewed for the present study. Out of 305 patients with ILD, 54 (17.7%) patients met the classification of IPAF, 175 (57.4%) patients had IPF, and 76 (24.9%) patients were diagnosed with CTD-ILD. Compared to IPF, incidences of acute exacerbations in 1,3 and 5 years were significantly less in the IPAF group (p = 0.022, p = 0.026 and p = 0.007, respectively). From multivariate analysis for mortality, age (p = 0.034, HR 1.022, 95% CI: 1.002–1.044), FVC (p < 0.001, HR 0.970, 95% CI: 0.955–0.984), ILD exacerbation (p = 0.001, HR 2.074, 95% CI: 1.366–3.148), and ILD type (p = 0.047, HR 0.436, 95% CI: 0.192–0.984 (IPAF vs IPF), respectively) showed significant association. Compared to the other ILD groups, IPAF showed distinct clinical characteristics. The IPAF group showed better survival and less episodes of exacerbation when compared to the IPF group.