Madeline A. Czeck
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Madeline A. Czeck has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Donald R. Dengel
4 shared publications- Donald R. Dengel
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
4 shared publications Erica J. Roelofs
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
4 shared publicationsAaron S. Kelly
Center for Pediatric Obesity Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
2 shared publicationsNicholas G. Evanoff
2 shared publicationsTyler A. Bosch
Performance & Data Analytics, Red Bull Athlete Performance Center, Santa Monica, California
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 23 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 55, 185-190
Total and regional dual X-ray absorptiometry derived four-compartment model
- 23 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 55, 185-190
Total and regional dual X-ray absorptiometry derived four-compartment model
- 1 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Densitometry
- Vol. 26 (2) , 101360
Muscle-to-Bone and Soft Tissue-to-Bone Ratio in Children and Adolescents with Obesity
- 1 March 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Densitometry
- Vol. 26 (2) , 101360
Muscle-to-Bone and Soft Tissue-to-Bone Ratio in Children and Adolescents with Obesity
- 21 October 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 52, 100-104
Dual X-ray absorptiometry-derived total and regional body volume
- 21 October 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
- Vol. 52, 100-104
Dual X-ray absorptiometry-derived total and regional body volume
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1749-1752
No Changes in Body Composition in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players because of COVID-19 Restrictions
Czeck, MA, Roelofs, EJ, Evanoff, NG, and Dengel, DR. No Changes in body composition in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players due to COVID-19 restrictions. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1749–1752, 2022—The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions on body composition, assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), between the 2020 postseason (pre–COVID-19 restrictions) and the 2021 postseason (post–COVID-19 restrictions) in collegiate football players (n = 50). In addition, a subset of athletes (n = 23) was used to explore body composition variables across 4 postseason time points. Body composition variables assessed were total and regional body fat percent, total mass, lean mass, fat mass, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and visceral adipose tissue mass. Paired t-tests were used to determine differences between the 2020 postseason and the 2021 postseason in body composition variables. Analysis of variance with Tukey HSD post hoc tests assessed significant differences in total and regional body composition across 4 years while adjusting for multiple comparisons. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between postseason 2020 and postseason 2021 for all measures of body composition. In a subset of athletes, body composition was analyzed over a 4-year period of time. There were no significant differences between all 4 time points for all measures of body composition. In conclusion, body composition variables in this study's subjects were not affected because of coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions or over 4 years of their collegiate football career.
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1749-1752
No Changes in Body Composition in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players because of COVID-19 Restrictions
Czeck, MA, Roelofs, EJ, Evanoff, NG, and Dengel, DR. No Changes in body composition in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players due to COVID-19 restrictions. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1749–1752, 2022—The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) restrictions on body composition, assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), between the 2020 postseason (pre–COVID-19 restrictions) and the 2021 postseason (post–COVID-19 restrictions) in collegiate football players (n = 50). In addition, a subset of athletes (n = 23) was used to explore body composition variables across 4 postseason time points. Body composition variables assessed were total and regional body fat percent, total mass, lean mass, fat mass, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, and visceral adipose tissue mass. Paired t-tests were used to determine differences between the 2020 postseason and the 2021 postseason in body composition variables. Analysis of variance with Tukey HSD post hoc tests assessed significant differences in total and regional body composition across 4 years while adjusting for multiple comparisons. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between postseason 2020 and postseason 2021 for all measures of body composition. In a subset of athletes, body composition was analyzed over a 4-year period of time. There were no significant differences between all 4 time points for all measures of body composition. In conclusion, body composition variables in this study's subjects were not affected because of coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions or over 4 years of their collegiate football career.
- 15 November 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 187-192
Body Composition and On-Ice Skate Times for National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Collegiate Male and Female Ice Hockey Athletes
Czeck, MA, Roelofs, EJ, Dietz, C, Bosch, TA, and Dengel, DR. Body composition and on-ice skate times for NCAA Division I collegiate male and female ice hockey athletes. J Strength Cond Res 36(1): 187–192, 2022—This study's purpose was to explore positional differences for an on-ice timed skate test and its relationship to body composition. Male ( n = 15) and female ( n = 18) collegiate hockey players participated in this study (total n = 33). Each player was categorized by position of forward or defensemen. Dual x-ray absorptiometry assessed total body composition variables of lean, fat, and bone mass as well as regional measures of lean mass, fat mass, and visceral adipose tissue. Total time and section times were determined for the on-ice skating test through a gated automatic timing system at 9, 18, 24, 42, 48, 66, 82, 132, and 148 m. Analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significance difference assessed on-ice skate time differences between positions ( p ≤ 0.05). Correlations between body composition variables and skate times were determined for change of direction, skating time, linear skate time, and total skate time. There were no significant differences between positions for skate times ( p > 0.05). Body fat percent ( p = 0.007; r = 0.55), total fat mass ( p = 0.027; r = 0.46), and leg fat mass ( p = 0.019; 0.49) were significantly correlated with total skate time in men, whereas only body fat percent was significantly correlated with change of direction ( p = 0.022; r = 0.54) and total skate times ( p = 0.016; r = 0.56) in women. The total upper-body mass to leg lean mass ratio was significantly correlated with change of direction ( p = 0.036; r = 0.50) in women. In conclusion, the results from this study suggest no differences between on-ice skating times between forwards and defensemen. However, body fat percentage was correlated with on-ice skate times in male and female collegiate hockey players.
- 15 November 2021
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 187-192
Body Composition and On-Ice Skate Times for National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Collegiate Male and Female Ice Hockey Athletes
Czeck, MA, Roelofs, EJ, Dietz, C, Bosch, TA, and Dengel, DR. Body composition and on-ice skate times for NCAA Division I collegiate male and female ice hockey athletes. J Strength Cond Res 36(1): 187–192, 2022—This study's purpose was to explore positional differences for an on-ice timed skate test and its relationship to body composition. Male ( n = 15) and female ( n = 18) collegiate hockey players participated in this study (total n = 33). Each player was categorized by position of forward or defensemen. Dual x-ray absorptiometry assessed total body composition variables of lean, fat, and bone mass as well as regional measures of lean mass, fat mass, and visceral adipose tissue. Total time and section times were determined for the on-ice skating test through a gated automatic timing system at 9, 18, 24, 42, 48, 66, 82, 132, and 148 m. Analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significance difference assessed on-ice skate time differences between positions ( p ≤ 0.05). Correlations between body composition variables and skate times were determined for change of direction, skating time, linear skate time, and total skate time. There were no significant differences between positions for skate times ( p > 0.05). Body fat percent ( p = 0.007; r = 0.55), total fat mass ( p = 0.027; r = 0.46), and leg fat mass ( p = 0.019; 0.49) were significantly correlated with total skate time in men, whereas only body fat percent was significantly correlated with change of direction ( p = 0.022; r = 0.54) and total skate times ( p = 0.016; r = 0.56) in women. The total upper-body mass to leg lean mass ratio was significantly correlated with change of direction ( p = 0.036; r = 0.50) in women. In conclusion, the results from this study suggest no differences between on-ice skating times between forwards and defensemen. However, body fat percentage was correlated with on-ice skate times in male and female collegiate hockey players.
- 11 August 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 227, 199-203.e1
Relationship of Apolipoproteins with Subclinical Cardiovascular Risk in Youth
- 11 August 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 227, 199-203.e1
Relationship of Apolipoproteins with Subclinical Cardiovascular Risk in Youth
- 30 September 2019
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Human Biology
- Vol. 32 (2) , e23330
Body fat percent assessment between electrical impedance myography and dual X‐ray absorptiometry
Objectives: To compare total and regional body fat percent (BF%) measurements obtained using a handheld electrical impedance myography (EIM) device in comparison to BF% measured by dual X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA).Methods: Sixty‐nine male and female (33 males/36 females; age = 21.9 ± 2.0 years, body mass index = 24.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2) college‐age individuals participated in this study. Each participant's total and regional (ie, upper arms, upper legs, trunk) BF% was estimated using EIM and DXA. Metallic markers were used to delineate regional boundaries for analysis, including upper arms (biceps/triceps), upper legs (quadriceps/hamstrings), and trunk (abdominal region/low back region). Paired t‐tests assessed the accuracy of BF% values estimated from EIM in comparison to BF% measured by DXA.Results: Observations revealed EIM reported significantly lower BF% for upper left arm (P < .001), upper right arm (P < .001), upper right leg (P = .002), and trunk (P < .001) values. However, no significant differences were observed in total (P = .434) and upper left leg (P = .855) BF% between the two devices.Conclusions: This study's observations suggest that, EIM may be an accurate field method for measuring total BF%, but not regional BF%.
- 30 September 2019
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Human Biology
- Vol. 32 (2) , e23330
Body fat percent assessment between electrical impedance myography and dual X‐ray absorptiometry
Objectives: To compare total and regional body fat percent (BF%) measurements obtained using a handheld electrical impedance myography (EIM) device in comparison to BF% measured by dual X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA).Methods: Sixty‐nine male and female (33 males/36 females; age = 21.9 ± 2.0 years, body mass index = 24.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2) college‐age individuals participated in this study. Each participant's total and regional (ie, upper arms, upper legs, trunk) BF% was estimated using EIM and DXA. Metallic markers were used to delineate regional boundaries for analysis, including upper arms (biceps/triceps), upper legs (quadriceps/hamstrings), and trunk (abdominal region/low back region). Paired t‐tests assessed the accuracy of BF% values estimated from EIM in comparison to BF% measured by DXA.Results: Observations revealed EIM reported significantly lower BF% for upper left arm (P < .001), upper right arm (P < .001), upper right leg (P = .002), and trunk (P < .001) values. However, no significant differences were observed in total (P = .434) and upper left leg (P = .855) BF% between the two devices.Conclusions: This study's observations suggest that, EIM may be an accurate field method for measuring total BF%, but not regional BF%.
- 23 July 2019
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in International Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 40 (10) , 645-649
Total and Regional Body Composition of NCAA Division I Collegiate Female Softball Athletes
The purpose of this study was to evaluate total, regional, and throwing versus non-throwing arm body composition measures across the 4 major positions of NCAA Division I female softball players using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (n=128). Total and regional total mass (TM), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and visceral adipose tissue were measured. Athletes were separated into: pitchers (n=32), catchers (n=13), outfielders (n=39), and infielders (n=44). ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD assessed total and regional differences between positions. Although no significant total or regional LM differences were observed across positions, outfielders had significantly (p=0.006–0.047) lower total-body, arm, and trunk TM and FM, leg FM, and leg BMC in comparison to pitchers. The throwing arm had significantly (p<0.0001–0.018) greater LM, BMD, and BMC than the non-throwing arm for all positions. Notably, there were minimal body composition differences among softball positions, with the primary differences being that pitchers had larger total and regional fat values than outfielders. The throwing arm of all positions had greater LM, BMD, and BMC than the non-throwing arm. These values can be used by coaches and trainers as descriptive DXA data for collegiate softball players.
- 23 July 2019
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in International Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 40 (10) , 645-649
Total and Regional Body Composition of NCAA Division I Collegiate Female Softball Athletes
The purpose of this study was to evaluate total, regional, and throwing versus non-throwing arm body composition measures across the 4 major positions of NCAA Division I female softball players using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (n=128). Total and regional total mass (TM), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and visceral adipose tissue were measured. Athletes were separated into: pitchers (n=32), catchers (n=13), outfielders (n=39), and infielders (n=44). ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD assessed total and regional differences between positions. Although no significant total or regional LM differences were observed across positions, outfielders had significantly (p=0.006–0.047) lower total-body, arm, and trunk TM and FM, leg FM, and leg BMC in comparison to pitchers. The throwing arm had significantly (p<0.0001–0.018) greater LM, BMD, and BMC than the non-throwing arm for all positions. Notably, there were minimal body composition differences among softball positions, with the primary differences being that pitchers had larger total and regional fat values than outfielders. The throwing arm of all positions had greater LM, BMD, and BMC than the non-throwing arm. These values can be used by coaches and trainers as descriptive DXA data for collegiate softball players.