Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Gwendolyn M. Stovall has a total of 58 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Widespread omission of aptamer-target binding verification in aptasensor development: Consequences for sensor performance and the need for a Kd gate

    by Sergey N. Krylov, Svetlana M. Krylova, An Thi Hoai Le, Philip E. Johnson, Ryan Hili, Derek J. Wilson, S. Brian Kim, Gwendolyn M. Stovall, Guobao Xu, Boris B. Dzantiev, et al.


  • Open Access

    The high school research initiative prepares and supports Texas science teachers doing research in their classrooms

    by Deanna Buckley, Gwendolyn Stovall, Bailey Williams, Josh Beckham, Dennis Mishler, Mary Ramsey, Stuart Reichler, Andrea Hutson

    Many Texas science teachers, especially in rural areas, lack access to content specific, inquiry-based professional development. To address this, UTeach and the Freshman Research Initiative partnered to create the High School Research Initiative (HRI), offering research-based curricula, training, and classroom support. The HRI leads teachers in a two-week research methods course and provides standard-aligned training in biomedical and behavioral research modules—Fish Behavior, Caffeinated Coli, Habitat Scouts, and Virtual Drug Screening—informed by active university research. Teachers receive lesson plans, activities, and materials to implement the modules in their classrooms. A mixed-methods evaluation revealed increased teacher preparedness, strong community support, and successful classroom integration. This paper outlines the HRIs’ model, highlights its impact, and offers strategies for preparing in-service science teachers.

  • Open Access

    UTexas Aptamer Database: the collection and long-term preservation of aptamer sequence information

    by Ali Askari, Sumedha Kota, Hailey Ferrell, Shriya Swamy, Kayla S Goodman, Christine C Okoro, Isaiah C Spruell Crenshaw, Daniela K Hernandez, Taylor E Oliphant, Akshata A Badrayani, et al.

    A growing interest in aptamer research, as evidenced by the increase in aptamer publications over the years, has led to calls for a go-to site for aptamer information. A comprehensive, publicly available aptamer dataset, which may be a repository for aptamer data, standardize aptamer reporting, and generate opportunities to expand current research in the field, could meet such a demand. There have been several attempts to create aptamer databases; however, most have been abandoned or removed entirely from public view. Inspired by previous efforts, we have published the UTexas Aptamer Database, https://sites.utexas.edu/aptamerdatabase, which includes a publicly available aptamer dataset and a searchable database containing a subset of all aptamer data collected to date (1990–2022). The dataset contains aptamer sequences, binding and selection information. The information is regularly reviewed internally to ensure accuracy and consistency across all entries. To support the continued curation and review of aptamer sequence information, we have implemented sustaining mechanisms, including researcher training protocols, an aptamer submission form, data stored separately from the database platform, and a growing team of researchers committed to updating the database. Currently, the UTexas Aptamer Database is the largest in terms of the number of aptamer sequences with 1,443 internally reviewed aptamer records.


  • Open Access

    Systematic Review of Aptamer Sequence Reporting in the Literature Reveals Widespread Unexplained Sequence Alterations

    by Alexandra A. Miller, Abhijit S. Rao, Sujana R. Nelakanti, Christopher Kujalowicz, Ted Shi, Ted Rodriguez, Andrew D. Ellington, Gwendolyn M. Stovall

    Aptamers have been the subject of more than 144 000 papers to date. However, there has been a growing concern that discrepancies in the reporting of aptamer research limit the reliability of these reagents for research and other applications. These observations noting inconsistencies in the use of our RNA antilysozyme aptamer served as an impetus for our systematic review of the reporting of aptamer sequences in the literature. Our detailed examination of the literature citing the RNA antilysozyme aptamer revealed that 93% of the 61 publications reviewed reported unexplained altered sequences with 96% of those using DNA variants. The 10 most cited aptamers were examined using a standardized methodology in order to categorize the extent to which the sequences themselves and altered sequences were adequately described in the literature. Our review of 780 aptamer publications spanned decades, multiple journals, and research groups and revealed that 41% of the papers reported unexplained sequence alterations or omitted sequences. We identified 10 common categories of sequence alterations including deletions, substitutions, and additions, among others. Overall, our findings can be used as a starting point for building better practices in author submissions and publication standards, elevating the rigor and reproducibility of aptamer research.


  • Open Access

    Systematic Review of Aptamer Sequence Reporting in the Literature Reveals Widespread Unexplained Sequence Alterations

    by Alexandra A. Miller, Abhijit S. Rao, Sujana R. Nelakanti, Christopher Kujalowicz, Ted Shi, Ted Rodriguez, Andrew D. Ellington, Gwendolyn M. Stovall

    Aptamers have been the subject of more than 144,000 papers to date. However, there has been a growing concern that errors in reporting aptamer research limit the reliability of these reagents for research and other applications. These observations noting inconsistencies in the use of our RNA anti-lysozyme aptamer served as an impetus for our systematic review of the reporting of aptamer sequences in the literature. Our detailed examination of literature citing the RNA anti-lysozyme aptamer revealed that 93% of the 61 publications reviewed reported unexplained altered sequences with 86% of those using DNA variants. The ten most cited aptamers were examined using a standardized methodology in order to categorize the extent to which the sequences themselves were apparently improperly reproduced, both in the literature and presumably in experiments beyond their discovery. Our review of 800 aptamer publications spanned decades, multiple journals, and research groups, and revealed that 44% of the papers reported unexplained sequence alterations. We identified ten common categories of sequence alterations including deletions, substitutions, additions, among others. The robust data set we have produced elucidates a source of irreproducibility and unreliability in our field and can be used as a starting point for building evidence-based best practices in publication standards to elevate the rigor and reproducibility of aptamer research.

  • Aptamers

    by Abhijit S. Rao, Joanna N. Assadourian, Alexandra A. Miller, Nicole C. Nnadi, Gwendolyn M. Stovall

  • Aptamers

    by Abhijit S. Rao, Joanna N. Assadourian, Alexandra A. Miller, Nicole C. Nnadi, Gwendolyn M. Stovall

  • Open Access

    Aptamers in Education: Undergraduates Make Aptamers and Acquire 21st Century Skills Along the Way

    by Gwendolyn M. Stovall, Vincent Huynh, Shelly Engelman, Andrew D. Ellington

    Aptamers have a well-earned place in therapeutic, diagnostic, and sensor applications, and we now show that they provide an excellent foundation for education, as well. Within the context of the Freshman Research Initiative (FRI) at The University of Texas at Austin, students have used aptamer selection and development technologies in a teaching laboratory to build technical and 21st century skills appropriate for research scientists. One of the unique aspects of this course-based undergraduate research experience is that students develop and execute their own projects, taking ownership of their experience in what would otherwise be a traditional teaching lab setting. Of the many successes, this work includes the isolation and characterization of novel calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (anti-CIAP) RNA aptamers by an undergraduate researcher. Further, preliminary survey data suggest that students who participate in the aptamer research experience express significant gains in their self-efficacy to conduct research, and their perceived ability to communicate scientific results, as well as organize and interpret data. This work describes, for the first time, the use of aptamers in an educational setting, highlights the positive student outcomes of the aptamer research experience, and presents the research findings relative to the novel anti-CIAP aptamer.


  • Technical and Biological Issues Relevant to Cell Typing with Aptamers

    by Na Li, Jessica N. Ebright, Gwendolyn M. Stovall, Xi Chen, Hong Hanh Nguyen, Amrita Singh, Angel Syrett, Andrew D. Ellington

    A number of aptamers have been selected against cell surface biomarkers or against eukaryotic tissue culture cells themselves. To determine the general utility of aptamers for assessing the cell surface proteome, we developed a standardized flow cytometry assay and carried out a comprehensive study with 7 different aptamers and 14 different cell lines. By examining how aptamers performed with a variety of cell lines, we identified difficulties in using aptamers for cell typing. While there are some aptamers that show excellent correlation between cell surface binding and the expression of a biomarker on the cell surface, other aptamers showed nonspecific binding by flow cytometry. For example, it has recently been claimed that an anti-PTK7 (protein tyrosine kinase 7) aptamer identified a new biomarker for leukemia cells, but data with the additional cell lines shows that it is possible that the aptamer instead identifies a propensity for adherence. Better understanding and controlling for the role of background and nonspecific binding to cells should open the way to using arrays of aptamers for describing and quantifying the cell surface proteome.