Caroline Sander

Seizure is a common symptom of meningioma that has a major impact on patients’ quality of life. The purpose of this study was to identify predictive factors for the occurrence of preoperative and postoperative seizures. The data of patients with resection of histologically confirmed meningioma at University Hospital Leipzig from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively examined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of different factors influencing seizure outcome were performed. The male gender was identified as an independent positive predictor for preoperative seizures (odds ratio [OR] 1.917 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.044–3.521], p = 0.036), whereas headache (OR 0.230 [95% CI 0.091–0.582], p = 0.002) and neurological deficits (OR 0.223; [95% CI 0.121–0.410], p < 0.001) were demonstrated to be negative predictive factors. Sensorimotor deficit after surgery (OR 4.490 [95% CI 2.231–9.037], p < 0.001) was found to be a positive predictor for the occurrence of postoperative seizures. The identified predictors for the occurrence of seizures in meningioma can contribute to improving seizure treatment and patients’ quality of life.

Introduction: Damage to white matter tracts can cause severe neurological deficits, which are often hardly predictable before brain tumor surgery. To explore the possibility of assessing white matter integrity and its preservation, we chose the frontal aslant tract (FAT) due to its involvement in multiple neurological functions like speech and movement initiation. Methods: Right-handed patients with left-hemispheric intracerebral tumors underwent FAT tractography within seven days before and three days after surgery. Neurological performance score (NPS) and aphasia score were assessed within seven days before and after surgery, as well as at follow-up three months postoperatively. Results: 15 patients were prospectively analyzed. After multivariate analysis and receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, we found that preoperative fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left FAT indicated the preoperative aphasia score (cutoff 0.40, p = 0.015). Aphasia scores three months postoperatively were predicted by both postoperative FA of the left FAT (cutoff 0.35, p = 0.005) and postoperatively preserved FA of the left FAT (cutoff 95.8 %, p = 0.017). Postoperatively preserved right FAT FA inversely predicted postoperative aphasia score (cutoff 95.1 %, p = 0.016). Discussion: Assessment of white matter integrity preservation is possible and correlates to outcome after brain tumor surgery. It may be useful for patient counseling and assessment of rehabilitation potential, as well as to investigate relevant brain networks in the future.

Background: Unplanned readmission has gained increasing interest as a quality marker for inpatient care, as it is associated with patient mortality and higher economic costs. Spinal neurosurgery is characterized by a lack of epidemiologic readmission data. The aim of this study was to identify causes and predictors for unplanned readmissions related to index diagnoses and surgical procedures. Methods: In this study, from 2015 to 2017, spinal neurosurgical procedures were recorded for surgical and non-surgical treated patients. The main reasons for an unplanned readmission within 30 days following discharge were identified. Multivariate logarithmic regression revealed predictors of unplanned readmission. Results: A total of 1172 patient records were examined, of which 4.27% disclosed unplanned readmissions. Among the surgical patients, the readmission rate was 4.06%, mainly attributable to surgical site infections, while it was 5.06% for the non-surgical patients, attributable to uncontrolled pain. A night-time surgery presented as the independent predictive factor. Conclusion: In the heterogeneous group of spinal neurosurgical patients, stratification into diagnostic groups is necessary for statistical analysis. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and spinal abscesses are mainly affected by unplanned readmission. The surgical procedure dorsal root ganglion stimulation is an independent predictor of unplanned re-hospitalizations, as is the timing of surgery.

Background: Brain metastasis (BM) of colorectal cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis of only a few months survival. However, it is difficult to estimate the individual prognosis of each patient due to the lack of definitive prognosis parameters. The number of metastases and the Karnofsky performance score are known predictors for survival. We investigated whether or not the neurological performance score and the tumor volumetrics are equally suitable predictors for survival. Design: All patients with histologically diagnosed BM linked to colorectal cancer between 2012 and March 2020 were reviewed. The Medical Research Council Neurological Performance Score was used to quantify neurological performance. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier estimate and log-rank test was performed. Survival prediction and multivariate analysis were performed employing Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in our analysis with an overall survival of 4.9 months after surgery of the BM. Survival decreased in the univariate analysis with increasing postoperative neurological performance score, low Karnofsky performance score, absence of radiation therapy and radiation therapy modality. The neurological performance score is a reliable scoring parameter for estimating the prognostic course analogous to the Karnofsky performance score. Neither preoperative nor post resection residual tumor volume had any impact on overall survival in our small cohort. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the postoperative neurological performance is a valuable prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients with BM. Tumor volumetrics show no correlation to survival. Further investigations with a larger number of cases are mandatory.

Objective: While cavernous carotid aneurysms can cause neurological symptoms, their often-uneventful natural course and the increasing options of intravascular aneurysm closure call for educated decision-making. However, evidence-based guidelines are missing. Here, we report 64 patients with cavernous carotid aneurysms, their respective therapeutic strategies, and follow-up. Methods: We included all patients with cavernous carotid aneurysms who presented to our clinic between 2014 and 2020 and recorded comorbidities (elevated blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and nicotine consumption), PHASES score, aneurysm site, size and shape, therapeutic strategy, neurological deficits, and clinical follow-up. Results: The mean age of the 64 patients (86% female) was 53 years, the mean follow-up time was 3.8 years. A total of 22 patients suffered from cranial nerve deficit. Of these patients, 50% showed a relief of symptoms regardless of the therapy regime. We found no significant correlations between aneurysm size or PHASES score and the occurrence of neurological symptoms. Conclusion: If aneurysm specific symptoms persist over a longer period of time, relief is difficult to achieve despite aneurysm treatment. Patients should be advised by experts in neurovascular centers, weighing the possibility of an uneventful course against the risks of treatment. In this regard, more detailed prospective data is needed to improve individual patient counseling.

The healthcare system has been placed under an enormous burden by the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to the challenge of providing sufficient care for COVID-19 patients, there is also a need to ensure adequate care for non-COVID-19 patients. We investigated neurosurgical care in a university hospital during the pandemic. We examined the second wave of the pandemic from 1 October 2020 to 15 March 2021 in this retrospective single-center study and compared it to a pre-pandemic period from 1 October 2019 to 15 March 2020. Any neurosurgical intervention, along with patient- and treatment-dependent factors, were recorded. We also examined perioperative complications and unplanned readmissions. A statistical comparison of the study groups was performed. We treated 535 patients with a total of 602 neurosurgical surgeries during the pandemic. This compares to 602 patients with 717 surgeries during the pre-pandemic period. There were 67 fewer patients (reduction to 88.87%) admitted and 115 fewer surgeries (reduction to 83.96%) performed, which were essentially highly elective procedures, such as cervical spinal stenosis, intracranial neurinomas, and peripheral nerve lesions. Regarding complication rates and unplanned readmissions, there was no significant difference between the COVID-19 pandemic and the non-pandemic patient group. Operative capacities were slightly reduced to 88% due to the pandemic. Nevertheless, comprehensive emergency and elective care was guaranteed in our university hospital. This speaks for the sufficient resources and high-quality processes that existed even before the pandemic.

PurposeUnplanned readmission has gained increasing interest as a quality marker for inpatient care, as it is associated with patient mortality and higher economic costs. Spinal neurosurgery is characterized by a lack of epidemiologic readmission data. The aim of this study was to identify causes and predictors for unplanned readmissions related to index diagnoses and surgical procedures. MethodsIn this study from 2015-2017, spinal neurosurgical procedures were recorded. The main reasons for an unplanned readmission in between 30 days after discharge were identified. Multivariate logarithmic regression revealed predictors of unplanned readmission. Results1172 patient records were examined, of which 4.27 % disclosed unplanned readmissions. Among the surgical patients the readmission rate was 4.06 % mainly due to surgical site infections, for the non-surgical patients 5.06 % due to uncontrolled pain. A night-time surgery presented as independent predictive factor. ConclusionIn the heterogeneous group of spinal neurosurgical patients, stratification into diagnostic groups is necessary for statistical analysis. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and spinal abscesses are mainly affected by unplanned readmission. The surgical procedure dorsal root ganglion stimulation is an independent predictor of unplanned re-hospitalizations, as is timing of surgery.

Background: Recent health care policy making has highlighted the necessity for understanding factors that influence readmission. To elucidate the rate, reason, and predictors of readmissions in neurosurgical patients, we analyzed unscheduled readmissions to our neurosurgical department after treatment for cranial or cerebral lesions.Methods: From 2015 to 2017, all adult patients who had been discharged from our Department of Neurosurgery and were readmitted within 30 days were included into the study cohort. The patients were divided into a surgical and a non-surgical group. The main outcome measure was unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days of discharge.Results: During the observation period, 183 (7.4%) of 2486 patients had to be readmitted unexpectedly within 30 days after discharge. The main readmission causes were surgical site infection (34.4 %) and seizure (16.4%) in the surgical group, compared to natural progression of the original diagnosis (38.2%) in the non-surgical group. Most important predictors for an unplanned readmission were younger age, presence of malignoma (OR: 2.44), and presence of cardiovascular side diagnoses in the surgical group. In the non-surgical group, predictors were length of stay (OR: 1.07) and the need for intensive care (OR: 5.79).Conclusions: We demonstrated that reasons for readmission vary between operated and non-operated patients and are preventable in large numbers. In addition, we identified treatment-related partly modifiable factors as predictors of unplanned readmission in the non-surgical group, while unmodifiable patient-related factors predominated in the surgical group. Further patient-related risk adjustment models are needed to establish an individualized preventive strategy in order to reduce unplanned readmissions.

Purpose: Familial glioblastoma multiforme (gbm) has been described in children with hereditary tumor syndromes. The occurrence of gbm in adult members of the same family and in the absence of tumor syndromes is extremely rare. We describe the cases of a brother and a sister with multifocal gbm diagnosed at the age of 63 years. We discuss three further paired gbm in adult patients from the literature. Patients and results: The sister was diagnosed with multifocal primary gbm in 2014 at the age of 63 years and 6 months. In 2018, her younger brother had to be operated on for a multifocal primary gbm at the age of 63 years and 9 months. Extended neuropathological examination revealed most markers to be similar, except for the percentage of O^6,-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promotor methylation, the presence of intratumoral immune cells and the immunohistochemical expression of C12ORF75. Comparison with further published cases of familial adult GBM reveals that most of these patients are male, about 65 years old and the tumor is localized predominantly in the left temporal lobe. Conclusion: Paired adult familial gbm occurs mainly in the elderly male patient with an integrative diagnosis of primary gbm. Whereas a statistical coincidence seems to be most likely in these rare cases, supplementary and improved genetic studies may identify pathogenetic causes of gbm.