Quentin Joly
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Quentin Joly has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adrian Kastler
Neuroradiology and MRI unit, Grenoble University Hospital, 38700 La Tronche, France
1 shared publication - Bruno Kastler
Univ Paris Cite, Radiol Adulte Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Radiol Intervent Douleur, 149 Rue Sevres, F-75015 Paris, France
1 shared publication - Francois H. Cornelis
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
1 shared publication Maud Nouri-Neuville
Sorbonne Université, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
1 shared publicationMohamed Ben-Ammar
Sorbonne Université, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
1 shared publication- Nicolas Amoretti
Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 06200 Nice, France
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Innovative Spine Implants for Improved Augmentation and Stability in Neoplastic Vertebral Compression Fracture
Background and objectives: Tumor-related vertebral compression fractures often result in severe back pain as well as progressive neurologic impairment and additional morbidities. The fixation of these fractures is essential to obtain good pain relief and to improve the patients’ quality of life. Thus far, several spine implants have been developed and studied. The aims of this review were to describe the implants and the techniques proposed to treat cancer-related vertebral compression fractures and to compile their safety and efficacy results. Materials and Methods: A systematic MEDLINE/PubMed literature search was performed, time period included articles published between January 2000 and March 2019. Original articles were selected based on their clinical relevance. Results: Four studies of interest and other cited references were analyzed. These studies reported significant pain and function improvement as well as kyphotic angle and vertebral height restoration and maintain for every implant and technique investigated. Conclusions: Although good clinical performance is reported on these devices, the small numbers of studies and patients investigated draw the need for further larger evaluation before drawing a definitive treatment decision tree to guide physicians managing patients presenting with neoplastic vertebral compression fracture.
Open AccessInnovative Spine Implants for Improved Augmentation and Stability in Neoplastic Vertebral Compression Fracture
Background and objectives: Tumor-related vertebral compression fractures often result in severe back pain as well as progressive neurologic impairment and additional morbidities. The fixation of these fractures is essential to obtain good pain relief and to improve the patients’ quality of life. Thus far, several spine implants have been developed and studied. The aims of this review were to describe the implants and the techniques proposed to treat cancer-related vertebral compression fractures and to compile their safety and efficacy results. Materials and Methods: A systematic MEDLINE/PubMed literature search was performed, time period included articles published between January 2000 and March 2019. Original articles were selected based on their clinical relevance. Results: Four studies of interest and other cited references were analyzed. These studies reported significant pain and function improvement as well as kyphotic angle and vertebral height restoration and maintain for every implant and technique investigated. Conclusions: Although good clinical performance is reported on these devices, the small numbers of studies and patients investigated draw the need for further larger evaluation before drawing a definitive treatment decision tree to guide physicians managing patients presenting with neoplastic vertebral compression fracture.