William Stephens
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
William Stephens has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Stijn Sieckelinck
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
2 shared publications Hans Boutellier
1 shared publicationLinda Schoonmade
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publicationRonald van Steden
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publicationStijn Sieckelinck
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 11 January 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 56 (2) , 99-144
Boundary Spanning in Local Governance: A Scoping Review
Complex societal challenges require collaboration between organizations, often with conflicting priorities and ways of working. Connecting organizations has come to be referred to as boundary-spanning. There is a need to understand the features of boundary-spanning at the local level, since policy-makers and practitioners from different sectors need not only to work together but also to relate to the recipients of their interventions. Addressing this gap, a scoping review was conducted. The review highlights the need to carve out a contextualized conceptualization of boundary-spanning that accounts for the distinctive features of this work when embedded in local community context.
- 11 January 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 56 (2) , 99-144
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessBoundary Spanning in Local Governance: A Scoping Review
Complex societal challenges require collaboration between organizations, often with conflicting priorities and ways of working. Connecting organizations has come to be referred to as boundary-spanning. There is a need to understand the features of boundary-spanning at the local level, since policy-makers and practitioners from different sectors need not only to work together but also to relate to the recipients of their interventions. Addressing this gap, a scoping review was conducted. The review highlights the need to carve out a contextualized conceptualization of boundary-spanning that accounts for the distinctive features of this work when embedded in local community context.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
- Vol. 66
Resiliences to radicalization: Four key perspectives
- 1 September 2021
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
- Vol. 66
Open AccessResiliences to radicalization: Four key perspectives
- Open Access
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies on Terrorism
- Vol. 13 (1) , 142-165
Being resilient to radicalisation in PVE policy: a critical examination
The problematic nature of certain policies and approaches to preventing and countering violent extremism has been robustly demonstrated; it is clear that rethinking the prevention of violent extremism requires concerted attention. One response to critiques of security-driven approaches has been the adoption of the language of resilience building. However, the turn to resilience has not been matched by a fundamental rethinking of approach, and may often mask troubling approaches in the language of objectivity and positivity. In rethinking the question of prevention, examining the concept of resilience is important not only to address a current trend in policy discourse, but also to benefit from the rich literature on resilience from which valuable lessons may be drawn. A critically informed concept of resilience has the potential to provide a framework of response that recognises individuals and communities as political actors who, rather than being shielded from ideologies, require the resources and channels to challenge violence, discrimination, and injustice, be it state or non-state driven. This article, through examining the current use of “resilience” in PVE policies, makes a modest attempt to draw on lessons from applying resilience in other contexts to articulate possible features of a critically informed approach to preventing violent extremism.
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies on Terrorism
- Vol. 13 (1) , 142-165
Open AccessBeing resilient to radicalisation in PVE policy: a critical examination
The problematic nature of certain policies and approaches to preventing and countering violent extremism has been robustly demonstrated; it is clear that rethinking the prevention of violent extremism requires concerted attention. One response to critiques of security-driven approaches has been the adoption of the language of resilience building. However, the turn to resilience has not been matched by a fundamental rethinking of approach, and may often mask troubling approaches in the language of objectivity and positivity. In rethinking the question of prevention, examining the concept of resilience is important not only to address a current trend in policy discourse, but also to benefit from the rich literature on resilience from which valuable lessons may be drawn. A critically informed concept of resilience has the potential to provide a framework of response that recognises individuals and communities as political actors who, rather than being shielded from ideologies, require the resources and channels to challenge violence, discrimination, and injustice, be it state or non-state driven. This article, through examining the current use of “resilience” in PVE policies, makes a modest attempt to draw on lessons from applying resilience in other contexts to articulate possible features of a critically informed approach to preventing violent extremism.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 2 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
- Vol. 44 (4) , 346-361
Preventing Violent Extremism: A Review of the Literature
- 2 January 2019
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
- Vol. 44 (4) , 346-361
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessPreventing Violent Extremism: A Review of the Literature