Praveen Kumar
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Praveen Kumar has a total of 84 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Pratik D. Jagtap
University of Minnesota
11 shared publications - Subina Mehta
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota
11 shared publications - Caleb Easterly
Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, 123 W Franklin St Suite 210, Chapel Hill, NC 27516
10 shared publications - Timothy J. Griffin
University of Minnesota
10 shared publications - James E. Johnson
Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota
8 shared publications - Brook Leanne Nunn
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 17 (1)
A dihydrouracil CRBN ligand mitigates IMiD associated safety liabilities in heterobifunctional targeted protein degrader
Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) like lenalidomide and pomalidomide are effective in treating multiple myeloma (MM) but pose hematotoxicity risks by degrading neosubstrates Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3). When these IMiD scaffolds are integrated into proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), they can inadvertently lead to the degradation of these neosubstrates alongside the intended protein of interest (POI), raising safety concerns. This study profiles existing PROTACs and reveals instances of undesired degradation of IMiD-associated neosubstrates. We have developed in vitro hematopoietic assays to scrutinize the IMiD effects and describe the mechanistic insights on cell differentiation rewiring towards megakaryocytes together with an activation of the interferon response that is phenocopied by an Ikaros knock-out model. Moreover, we have identified a CRBN ligand that mitigates these safety liabilities and can be effectively incorporated into PROTACs. This advancement provides a promising path toward safer preclinical development of PROTACs, especially as the field expands into chronic disease treatments beyond oncology.
- 25 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 17 (1)
Open AccessA dihydrouracil CRBN ligand mitigates IMiD associated safety liabilities in heterobifunctional targeted protein degrader
Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) like lenalidomide and pomalidomide are effective in treating multiple myeloma (MM) but pose hematotoxicity risks by degrading neosubstrates Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3). When these IMiD scaffolds are integrated into proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), they can inadvertently lead to the degradation of these neosubstrates alongside the intended protein of interest (POI), raising safety concerns. This study profiles existing PROTACs and reveals instances of undesired degradation of IMiD-associated neosubstrates. We have developed in vitro hematopoietic assays to scrutinize the IMiD effects and describe the mechanistic insights on cell differentiation rewiring towards megakaryocytes together with an activation of the interferon response that is phenocopied by an Ikaros knock-out model. Moreover, we have identified a CRBN ligand that mitigates these safety liabilities and can be effectively incorporated into PROTACs. This advancement provides a promising path toward safer preclinical development of PROTACs, especially as the field expands into chronic disease treatments beyond oncology.
- 8 March 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 20 (4) , 2130-2137
Updates on metaQuantome Software for Quantitative Metaproteomics
MetaQuantome is a software suite that enables the quantitative analysis, statistical evaluation. and visualization of mass-spectrometry-based metaproteomics data. In the latest update of this software, we have provided several extensions, including a step-by-step training guide, the ability to perform statistical analysis on samples from multiple conditions, and a comparative analysis of metatranscriptomics data. The training module, accessed via the Galaxy Training Network, will help users to use the suite effectively both for functional as well as for taxonomic analysis. We extend the ability of metaQuantome to now perform multi-data-point quantitative and statistical analyses so that studies with measurements across multiple conditions, such as time-course studies, can be analyzed. With an eye on the multiomics analysis of microbial communities, we have also initiated the use of metaQuantome statistical and visualization tools on outputs from metatranscriptomics data, which complements the metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses already available. For this, we have developed a tool named MT2MQ (“metatranscriptomics to metaQuantome”), which takes in outputs from the ASaiM metatranscriptomics workflow and transforms them so that the data can be used as an input for comparative statistical analysis and visualization via metaQuantome. We believe that these improvements to metaQuantome will facilitate the use of the software for quantitative metaproteomics and metatranscriptomics and will enable multipoint data analysis. These improvements will take us a step toward integrative multiomic microbiome analysis so as to understand dynamic taxonomic and functional responses of these complex systems in a variety of biological contexts. The updated metaQuantome and MT2MQ are open-source software and are available via the Galaxy Toolshed and GitHub.
- 8 March 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 20 (4) , 2130-2137
Updates on metaQuantome Software for Quantitative Metaproteomics
MetaQuantome is a software suite that enables the quantitative analysis, statistical evaluation. and visualization of mass-spectrometry-based metaproteomics data. In the latest update of this software, we have provided several extensions, including a step-by-step training guide, the ability to perform statistical analysis on samples from multiple conditions, and a comparative analysis of metatranscriptomics data. The training module, accessed via the Galaxy Training Network, will help users to use the suite effectively both for functional as well as for taxonomic analysis. We extend the ability of metaQuantome to now perform multi-data-point quantitative and statistical analyses so that studies with measurements across multiple conditions, such as time-course studies, can be analyzed. With an eye on the multiomics analysis of microbial communities, we have also initiated the use of metaQuantome statistical and visualization tools on outputs from metatranscriptomics data, which complements the metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses already available. For this, we have developed a tool named MT2MQ (“metatranscriptomics to metaQuantome”), which takes in outputs from the ASaiM metatranscriptomics workflow and transforms them so that the data can be used as an input for comparative statistical analysis and visualization via metaQuantome. We believe that these improvements to metaQuantome will facilitate the use of the software for quantitative metaproteomics and metatranscriptomics and will enable multipoint data analysis. These improvements will take us a step toward integrative multiomic microbiome analysis so as to understand dynamic taxonomic and functional responses of these complex systems in a variety of biological contexts. The updated metaQuantome and MT2MQ are open-source software and are available via the Galaxy Toolshed and GitHub.
- Open Access
- 10 November 2020
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (11) , e0241503
Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional relevance of expressed microbial genes or proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein expression of microbiomes. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, to enable researchers to make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental caries plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN5, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the NCBI non-redundant database revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation varied between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated more accurate GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
- 10 November 2020
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (11) , e0241503
Open AccessSurvey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional relevance of expressed microbial genes or proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein expression of microbiomes. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, to enable researchers to make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental caries plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN5, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the NCBI non-redundant database revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation varied between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated more accurate GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
- Open Access
Precursor Intensity-Based Label-Free Quantification Software Tools for Proteomic and Multi-Omic Analysis within the Galaxy Platform
For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. LFQ enables peptide-level quantitation, which is useful in proteomics (analyzing peptides carrying post-translational modifications) and multi-omics studies such as metaproteomics (analyzing taxon-specific microbial peptides) and proteogenomics (analyzing non-canonical sequences). Bioinformatics workflows accessible via the Galaxy platform have proven useful for analysis of such complex multi-omic studies. However, workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested LFQ tools. In this study, we have evaluated moFF and FlashLFQ, two open-source LFQ tools, and implemented them within the Galaxy platform to offer access and use via established workflows. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tool developers, we have optimized the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated include: (a) match-between-runs (MBR); (b) using multiple file-formats as input for improved quantification; (c) use of containers and/or conda packages; (d) parameters needed for analyzing large datasets; and (e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work establishes a process for software implementation, optimization, and validation, and offers access to two robust software tools for LFQ-based analysis within the Galaxy platform.
Open AccessPrecursor Intensity-Based Label-Free Quantification Software Tools for Proteomic and Multi-Omic Analysis within the Galaxy Platform
For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. LFQ enables peptide-level quantitation, which is useful in proteomics (analyzing peptides carrying post-translational modifications) and multi-omics studies such as metaproteomics (analyzing taxon-specific microbial peptides) and proteogenomics (analyzing non-canonical sequences). Bioinformatics workflows accessible via the Galaxy platform have proven useful for analysis of such complex multi-omic studies. However, workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested LFQ tools. In this study, we have evaluated moFF and FlashLFQ, two open-source LFQ tools, and implemented them within the Galaxy platform to offer access and use via established workflows. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tool developers, we have optimized the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated include: (a) match-between-runs (MBR); (b) using multiple file-formats as input for improved quantification; (c) use of containers and/or conda packages; (d) parameters needed for analyzing large datasets; and (e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work establishes a process for software implementation, optimization, and validation, and offers access to two robust software tools for LFQ-based analysis within the Galaxy platform.
- 12 May 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 19 (7) , 2772-2785
A Sectioning and Database Enrichment Approach for Improved Peptide Spectrum Matching in Large, Genome-Guided Protein Sequence Databases
Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe and evaluate a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics – offering a flexible alternative to traditional large database searching, as well as previously described two-step database searching methods for large sequence database applications. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to an automated and customizable workflow for carrying out the method. Additionally, the results of this study provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations offered by available methods aimed at addressing challenges of genome-guided, large database applications in proteomics. Relevant raw data has been made available at https://zenodo.org/ using dataset identifier “3754789” and https://arcticdata.io/catalog using dataset identifier “A2VX06340”.
- 12 May 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 19 (7) , 2772-2785
A Sectioning and Database Enrichment Approach for Improved Peptide Spectrum Matching in Large, Genome-Guided Protein Sequence Databases
Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe and evaluate a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics – offering a flexible alternative to traditional large database searching, as well as previously described two-step database searching methods for large sequence database applications. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to an automated and customizable workflow for carrying out the method. Additionally, the results of this study provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations offered by available methods aimed at addressing challenges of genome-guided, large database applications in proteomics. Relevant raw data has been made available at https://zenodo.org/ using dataset identifier “3754789” and https://arcticdata.io/catalog using dataset identifier “A2VX06340”.
- Open Access
Precursor intensity-based label-free quantification software tools for proteomic and multiomic analysis within the Galaxy Platform
For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. In LFQ workflows, protein abundance changes are inferred from peptide-level information, including microbial peptides (for metaproteomics) and peptides carrying post-translational modifications (for proteomics) and/or variant sequences (for proteogenomics). Multi-omics studies (such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics) rely on peptide detection and quantification to identify and quantify peptides that map to unique proteoforms and metaproteins. The Galaxy for proteomics (Galaxy-P) platform has proven useful for the development of accessible workflows to identify proteins in these complex multi-omic studies. However, proteomics workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested label-free quantification tools. In this study, our main goals were to evaluate two recently published open-source LFQ tools and to implement them within the Galaxy platform, enabling their easy integration with established workflows. These two tools, moFF and FlashLFQ, were selected based on their described peptide quantification capabilities and amenability to Galaxy implementation. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tools’ developers, we gained insights into the software features necessary for maximizing the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated included: a) match-between-runs (MBR); b) using both Thermo .raw and HUPO standards .mzML file formats as input for improved quantification; c) use of containers and/or conda packages; d) parameters needed for analyzing large input datasets; and e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work 1) establishes a process for software implementation, optimization and validation within Galaxy; and 2) makes powerful new tools for LFQ available which should prove highly useful for a variety of proteomics and multi-omics applications employing the Galaxy platform.
Open AccessPrecursor intensity-based label-free quantification software tools for proteomic and multiomic analysis within the Galaxy Platform
For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. In LFQ workflows, protein abundance changes are inferred from peptide-level information, including microbial peptides (for metaproteomics) and peptides carrying post-translational modifications (for proteomics) and/or variant sequences (for proteogenomics). Multi-omics studies (such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics) rely on peptide detection and quantification to identify and quantify peptides that map to unique proteoforms and metaproteins. The Galaxy for proteomics (Galaxy-P) platform has proven useful for the development of accessible workflows to identify proteins in these complex multi-omic studies. However, proteomics workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested label-free quantification tools. In this study, our main goals were to evaluate two recently published open-source LFQ tools and to implement them within the Galaxy platform, enabling their easy integration with established workflows. These two tools, moFF and FlashLFQ, were selected based on their described peptide quantification capabilities and amenability to Galaxy implementation. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tools’ developers, we gained insights into the software features necessary for maximizing the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated included: a) match-between-runs (MBR); b) using both Thermo .raw and HUPO standards .mzML file formats as input for improved quantification; c) use of containers and/or conda packages; d) parameters needed for analyzing large input datasets; and e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work 1) establishes a process for software implementation, optimization and validation within Galaxy; and 2) makes powerful new tools for LFQ available which should prove highly useful for a variety of proteomics and multi-omics applications employing the Galaxy platform.
- Open Access
- 8 January 2020
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in bioRxiv
Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional role of expressed microbial genes/proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein complement of the microbiome. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, so that researchers can make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals.Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental carie plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! Tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN6, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms.Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the Universal Protein Knowledgebase revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation differed between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated the most precise GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
- 8 January 2020
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in bioRxiv
Open AccessSurvey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis
To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional role of expressed microbial genes/proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein complement of the microbiome. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, so that researchers can make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals.Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental carie plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! Tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN6, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms.Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the Universal Protein Knowledgebase revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation differed between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated the most precise GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.
- 3 December 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 19 (1) , 161-173
Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits
Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.
- 3 December 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 19 (1) , 161-173
Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits
Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.
- Open Access
A sectioning and database enrichment approach for improved peptide spectrum matching in large, genome-guided protein sequence databases
Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics. We demonstrate increased true positive PSM identifications using the sectioning method when compared to the traditional large database searching method, whereas it helped in reducing the false PSM identifications when compared to a previously described two-step method for reducing database size. The sectioning method for large sequence databases enables generation of an enriched protein sequence database and promotes increased sensitivity in identifying PSMs, while maintaining acceptable and manageable FDR. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to a usable and automated workflow for carrying out the method. Our results show the utility of this methodology for a wide-range of applications where genome-guided, large sequence databases are required for MS-based proteomics data analysis.
Open AccessA sectioning and database enrichment approach for improved peptide spectrum matching in large, genome-guided protein sequence databases
Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics. We demonstrate increased true positive PSM identifications using the sectioning method when compared to the traditional large database searching method, whereas it helped in reducing the false PSM identifications when compared to a previously described two-step method for reducing database size. The sectioning method for large sequence databases enables generation of an enriched protein sequence database and promotes increased sensitivity in identifying PSMs, while maintaining acceptable and manageable FDR. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to a usable and automated workflow for carrying out the method. Our results show the utility of this methodology for a wide-range of applications where genome-guided, large sequence databases are required for MS-based proteomics data analysis.
- Open Access
Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: a Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits
Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.
Open AccessChallenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: a Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits
Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.