Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Praveen Kumar has a total of 84 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    A dihydrouracil CRBN ligand mitigates IMiD associated safety liabilities in heterobifunctional targeted protein degrader

    by Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Jasper C. Komen, Ghaith M. Hamza, Natacha Bohin, Tomas Adomavicius, Angelo Andres, Stefan Blaho, Ulf Börjesson, Gavin W. Collie, Gian Marco De Donatis, et al.

    Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) like lenalidomide and pomalidomide are effective in treating multiple myeloma (MM) but pose hematotoxicity risks by degrading neosubstrates Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3). When these IMiD scaffolds are integrated into proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), they can inadvertently lead to the degradation of these neosubstrates alongside the intended protein of interest (POI), raising safety concerns. This study profiles existing PROTACs and reveals instances of undesired degradation of IMiD-associated neosubstrates. We have developed in vitro hematopoietic assays to scrutinize the IMiD effects and describe the mechanistic insights on cell differentiation rewiring towards megakaryocytes together with an activation of the interferon response that is phenocopied by an Ikaros knock-out model. Moreover, we have identified a CRBN ligand that mitigates these safety liabilities and can be effectively incorporated into PROTACs. This advancement provides a promising path toward safer preclinical development of PROTACs, especially as the field expands into chronic disease treatments beyond oncology.


  • Updates on metaQuantome Software for Quantitative Metaproteomics

    by Subina Mehta, Praveen Kumar, Marie Crane, James E. Johnson, Ray Sajulga, Dinh Duy An Nguyen, Thomas McGowan, Magnus Ø. Arntzen, Timothy J. Griffin, Pratik D. Jagtap

    MetaQuantome is a software suite that enables the quantitative analysis, statistical evaluation. and visualization of mass-spectrometry-based metaproteomics data. In the latest update of this software, we have provided several extensions, including a step-by-step training guide, the ability to perform statistical analysis on samples from multiple conditions, and a comparative analysis of metatranscriptomics data. The training module, accessed via the Galaxy Training Network, will help users to use the suite effectively both for functional as well as for taxonomic analysis. We extend the ability of metaQuantome to now perform multi-data-point quantitative and statistical analyses so that studies with measurements across multiple conditions, such as time-course studies, can be analyzed. With an eye on the multiomics analysis of microbial communities, we have also initiated the use of metaQuantome statistical and visualization tools on outputs from metatranscriptomics data, which complements the metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses already available. For this, we have developed a tool named MT2MQ (“metatranscriptomics to metaQuantome”), which takes in outputs from the ASaiM metatranscriptomics workflow and transforms them so that the data can be used as an input for comparative statistical analysis and visualization via metaQuantome. We believe that these improvements to metaQuantome will facilitate the use of the software for quantitative metaproteomics and metatranscriptomics and will enable multipoint data analysis. These improvements will take us a step toward integrative multiomic microbiome analysis so as to understand dynamic taxonomic and functional responses of these complex systems in a variety of biological contexts. The updated metaQuantome and MT2MQ are open-source software and are available via the Galaxy Toolshed and GitHub.


  • Open Access

    Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis

    by Ray Sajulga, Caleb Easterly, Michael Riffle, Bart Mesuere, Thilo Muth, Subina Mehta, Praveen Kumar, James Johnson, Bjoern Andreas Gruening, Henning Schiebenhoefer, et al.

    To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional relevance of expressed microbial genes or proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein expression of microbiomes. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, to enable researchers to make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental caries plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN5, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the NCBI non-redundant database revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation varied between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated more accurate GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.


  • Open Access

    Precursor Intensity-Based Label-Free Quantification Software Tools for Proteomic and Multi-Omic Analysis within the Galaxy Platform

    by Subina Mehta, Caleb W. Easterly, Ray Sajulga, Robert J. Millikin, Andrea Argentini, Ignacio Eguinoa, Lennart Martens, Michael R. Shortreed, Lloyd M. Smith, Thomas McGowan, et al.

    For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. LFQ enables peptide-level quantitation, which is useful in proteomics (analyzing peptides carrying post-translational modifications) and multi-omics studies such as metaproteomics (analyzing taxon-specific microbial peptides) and proteogenomics (analyzing non-canonical sequences). Bioinformatics workflows accessible via the Galaxy platform have proven useful for analysis of such complex multi-omic studies. However, workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested LFQ tools. In this study, we have evaluated moFF and FlashLFQ, two open-source LFQ tools, and implemented them within the Galaxy platform to offer access and use via established workflows. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tool developers, we have optimized the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated include: (a) match-between-runs (MBR); (b) using multiple file-formats as input for improved quantification; (c) use of containers and/or conda packages; (d) parameters needed for analyzing large datasets; and (e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work establishes a process for software implementation, optimization, and validation, and offers access to two robust software tools for LFQ-based analysis within the Galaxy platform.


  • A Sectioning and Database Enrichment Approach for Improved Peptide Spectrum Matching in Large, Genome-Guided Protein Sequence Databases

    by Praveen Kumar, James E. Johnson, Caleb Easterly, Subina Mehta, Ray Sajulga, Brook Nunn, Pratik D. Jagtap, Timothy J. Griffin

    Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe and evaluate a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics – offering a flexible alternative to traditional large database searching, as well as previously described two-step database searching methods for large sequence database applications. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to an automated and customizable workflow for carrying out the method. Additionally, the results of this study provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations offered by available methods aimed at addressing challenges of genome-guided, large database applications in proteomics. Relevant raw data has been made available at https://zenodo.org/ using dataset identifier “3754789” and https://arcticdata.io/catalog using dataset identifier “A2VX06340”.


  • Open Access

    Precursor intensity-based label-free quantification software tools for proteomic and multiomic analysis within the Galaxy Platform

    by Subina Mehta, Caleb W Easterly, Ray Sajulga, Robert J. Millikin, Andrea Argentini, Ignacio Eguinoa, Lennart Martens, Michael R. Shortreed, Lloyd M. Smith, Thomas McGowan, et al.

    For mass spectrometry-based peptide and protein quantification, label-free quantification (LFQ) based on precursor mass peak (MS1) intensities is considered reliable due to its dynamic range, reproducibility, and accuracy. In LFQ workflows, protein abundance changes are inferred from peptide-level information, including microbial peptides (for metaproteomics) and peptides carrying post-translational modifications (for proteomics) and/or variant sequences (for proteogenomics). Multi-omics studies (such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics) rely on peptide detection and quantification to identify and quantify peptides that map to unique proteoforms and metaproteins. The Galaxy for proteomics (Galaxy-P) platform has proven useful for the development of accessible workflows to identify proteins in these complex multi-omic studies. However, proteomics workflows within the Galaxy platform have lacked well-tested label-free quantification tools. In this study, our main goals were to evaluate two recently published open-source LFQ tools and to implement them within the Galaxy platform, enabling their easy integration with established workflows. These two tools, moFF and FlashLFQ, were selected based on their described peptide quantification capabilities and amenability to Galaxy implementation. Through rigorous testing and communication with the tools’ developers, we gained insights into the software features necessary for maximizing the performance of each tool. Software features evaluated included: a) match-between-runs (MBR); b) using both Thermo .raw and HUPO standards .mzML file formats as input for improved quantification; c) use of containers and/or conda packages; d) parameters needed for analyzing large input datasets; and e) optimization and validation of software performance. This work 1) establishes a process for software implementation, optimization and validation within Galaxy; and 2) makes powerful new tools for LFQ available which should prove highly useful for a variety of proteomics and multi-omics applications employing the Galaxy platform.


  • Open Access

    Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis

    by Ray Sajulga, Caleb Easterly, Michael Riffle, Bart Mesuere, Thilo Muth, Subina Mehta, Praveen Kumar, James Johnson, Bjoern Andreas Gruening, Henning Schiebenhoefer, et al.

    To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional role of expressed microbial genes/proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein complement of the microbiome. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, so that researchers can make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals.Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental carie plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! Tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN6, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms.Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the Universal Protein Knowledgebase revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation differed between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated the most precise GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.


  • Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: A Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits

    by Shane L. Hubler, Praveen Kumar, Subina Mehta, Caleb Easterly, James E. Johnson, Pratik D. Jagtap, Timothy J. Griffin

    Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.


  • Open Access

    A sectioning and database enrichment approach for improved peptide spectrum matching in large, genome-guided protein sequence databases

    by Praveen Kumar, James E. Johnson, Caleb Easterly, Subina Mehta, Ray Sajulga, Brook L Nunn, Pratik D. Jagtap, Timothy J. Griffin

    Multi-omics approaches focused on mass-spectrometry (MS)-based data, such as metaproteomics, utilize genomic and/or transcriptomic sequencing data to generate a comprehensive protein sequence database. These databases can be very large, containing millions of sequences, which reduces the sensitivity of matching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data to sequences to generate peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Here, we describe a sectioning method for generating an enriched database for those protein sequences that are most likely present in the sample. Our evaluation demonstrates how this method helps to increase the sensitivity of PSMs while maintaining acceptable false discovery rate statistics. We demonstrate increased true positive PSM identifications using the sectioning method when compared to the traditional large database searching method, whereas it helped in reducing the false PSM identifications when compared to a previously described two-step method for reducing database size. The sectioning method for large sequence databases enables generation of an enriched protein sequence database and promotes increased sensitivity in identifying PSMs, while maintaining acceptable and manageable FDR. Furthermore, implementation in the Galaxy platform provides access to a usable and automated workflow for carrying out the method. Our results show the utility of this methodology for a wide-range of applications where genome-guided, large sequence databases are required for MS-based proteomics data analysis.

  • Open Access

    Challenges in Peptide-Spectrum Matching: a Robust and Reproducible Statistical Framework for Removing Low-Accuracy, High-Scoring Hits

    by Shane L. Hubler, Praveen Kumar, Subina Mehta, Caleb Easterly, James E. Johnson, Pratik D. Jagtap, Timothy J. Griffin

    Workflows for large-scale (MS)-based shotgun proteomics can potentially lead to costly errors in the form of incorrect peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). To improve robustness of these workflows, we have investigated the use of the precursor mass discrepancy (PMD) to detect and filter potentially false PSMs that have, nonetheless, a high confidence score. We identified and addressed three cases of unexpected bias in PMD results: time of acquisition within a LC-MS run, decoy PSMs, and length of peptide. We created a post-analysis Bayesian confidence measure based on score and PMD, called PMD-FDR. We tested PMD-FDR on four datasets across three types of MS-based proteomics projects: standard (single organism; reference database), proteogenomics (single organism; customized genomic-based database plus reference), and metaproteomics (microorganism community; customized conglomerate database). On a ground truth dataset and other representative data, PMD-FDR was able to detect 60-80% of likely incorrect PSMs (false-hits) while losing only 5% of correct PSMs (true-hits). PMD-FDR can also be used to evaluate data quality for results generated within different experimental PSM-generating workflows, assisting in method development. Going forward, PMD-FDR should provide detection of high-scoring but likely false-hits, aiding applications which rely heavily on accurate PSMs, such as proteogenomics and metaproteomics.