Myung-Soo Song

Study Design: This was a retrospective observatory analysis study. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the differences in clinical and radiologic outcomes among patients who underwent anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) using titanium mesh cage (TMC) with end-caps and patients who underwent ACCF using TMC without end-cap. Summary of Background Data: TMC has been widely used as an effective treatment option for ACCF. However, the subsidence of TMC has been observed frequently in the early postoperative period in some cases, resulting in related clinical complications. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent single-level ACCF using TMC from September 2008 to June 2014 at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with TMC with end-cap were classified as an end-cap group, while patients treated with TMC without end-cap classified as a control group. The round press-fit–type end-caps with 2.5-degree angulation were used at both ends of the cage for the end-cap group. Patients were followed postoperatively for a minimum of 36 months with radiologic evaluation. Results: The subsidence was lower in the end-cap group (4.3±3.6 vs. 4.8±3.0, PP<0.01). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI) was reported significantly less in the study group, which showed a positive correlation with lesser severe subsidence. Also, the characteristics of subsidence differed between the 2 groups. In the end-cap group, slippage type subsidence occurred, resulting in better sagittal alignment than that in the control group. Conclusions: For patients undergoing single-level ACCF, using TMC with end-cap provided better clinical results and similar fusion rate, compared with using TMC without end-cap. The end-cap decreased the severity of postoperative subsidence and related neck pain. Also, sagittal alignment was well preserved, suggesting it may contribute to cervical lordosis.

The interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ICELF) provides access to the foraminal pathology with less violation to facet than the ipsilateral approach. However, it is technically challenging even for an experienced surgeon.

AIM: To compare the accuracy of determining pathologic segment between three-position MRI (3P-MRI) and post-myelographic CT (PMCT) in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) by assessing the degree of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. MATERIAL and METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3P-MRI and PMCT for the diagnosis of multilevel CSM in 136 patients who underwent surgery. Using an assessment scale, 8 blind observers with various clinical experiences examined 5 parameters: spinal canal narrowing, foraminal stenosis, bony abnormality, intervertebral disc herniation, and nerve root compression. Spinal canal, neural foraminal, spinal cord and disc protrusion diameters were measured. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of each image was analyzed. RESULTS: Spinal canal width and foraminal diameter was found to be significantly smaller in 3P-MRI compared to PMCT. No significant differences of cervical cord diameter and the size of disc protrusion measured in 3P-MRI compared to PMCT were observed. Comparing between 3P-MRI and PMCT, disc abnormality and nerve root compression showed better agreement on 3P-MRI, whereas foraminal stenosis and bony lesion showed better agreement on PMCT. CONCLUSION: In the present study, PMCT was still useful in diagnosis of the foraminal stenosis and bony lesion compared to 3P-MRI but showed limitation in disc abnormality and nerve root compression. Even though PMCT may provide valuable additional information in difficult or ambiguous cases, universal standard of 3P-MRI showed higher reliability in detecting pathologic levels in CSM patients.