John H. Stewart
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
John H. Stewart has a total of 101 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Vijay Kumar
Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
13 shared publications Edward A. Levine
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
7 shared publicationsPerry Shen
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
5 shared publicationsDouglas S. Lyles
Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
4 shared publications- Edward A. Levine
Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
4 shared publications Scott A. Northrup
Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
25 Years of Cancer Immunoediting: Dendritic Cells and Macrophages Filled the Missing Gap
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich first suggested that the immune system is critical for suppressing carcinogenesis and cancer growth, which led to the introduction of cancer immunosurveillance by Sir MacFarlane Burnet in 1960. Burnet’s cancer immunosurveillance was further supported and elaborated by Thomas Lewis in 1982, who noted, for example, the limitations of investigating cancer immunosurveillance in available experimental models, except for virus-induced cancers. The concept of cancer immunosurveillance in 2001 was revised to cancer immunoediting (the immunoediting term was introduced by Dr. Rober Schreiber), based on findings that the immune system not only controls tumorigenesis and tumor growth but also tumor quality/grade or immunogenicity. Advances in immunology, including the identification of target organs and the local immune system, and the identification of novel innate immune cells regulating the adaptive immune response, have further advanced the understanding of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. The current article discusses the evolution of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into cancer immunoediting. At the time of the introduction of cancer immunoediting, the direct role of dendritic cells (DCs) in tumor immunity and immunoediting was not much explored. Similarly, the concept of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and their role in cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting was not much studied. The current article discusses the evolution of DCs and TAMs in the context of tumor immunity, cancer immunoediting, and immunotherapies specifically targeting these innate immune cells.
Open Access25 Years of Cancer Immunoediting: Dendritic Cells and Macrophages Filled the Missing Gap
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich first suggested that the immune system is critical for suppressing carcinogenesis and cancer growth, which led to the introduction of cancer immunosurveillance by Sir MacFarlane Burnet in 1960. Burnet’s cancer immunosurveillance was further supported and elaborated by Thomas Lewis in 1982, who noted, for example, the limitations of investigating cancer immunosurveillance in available experimental models, except for virus-induced cancers. The concept of cancer immunosurveillance in 2001 was revised to cancer immunoediting (the immunoediting term was introduced by Dr. Rober Schreiber), based on findings that the immune system not only controls tumorigenesis and tumor growth but also tumor quality/grade or immunogenicity. Advances in immunology, including the identification of target organs and the local immune system, and the identification of novel innate immune cells regulating the adaptive immune response, have further advanced the understanding of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. The current article discusses the evolution of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into cancer immunoediting. At the time of the introduction of cancer immunoediting, the direct role of dendritic cells (DCs) in tumor immunity and immunoediting was not much explored. Similarly, the concept of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and their role in cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting was not much studied. The current article discusses the evolution of DCs and TAMs in the context of tumor immunity, cancer immunoediting, and immunotherapies specifically targeting these innate immune cells.
- Open Access
- 26 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
25 Years of Cancer Immunoediting: From Immunosurveillance to Cancer Immunotherapies
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich first suggested that the immune system is critical for suppressing carcinogenesis and cancer growth, which led to the introduction of cancer immunosurveillance by Sir MacFarlane Burnet in 1960. Burnet’s cancer immunosurveillance was further supported and elaborated by Thomas Lewis in 1982, who noted, for example, the limitations of investigating cancer immunosurveillance in available experimental models, except for virus-induced cancers. The concept of cancer immunosurveillance in 2001 was revised to cancer immunoediting, based on findings that the immune system not only controls tumorigenesis and tumor growth but also tumor quality or immunogenicity. Advances in immunology, including the identification of target organs and the local immune system, and the identification of novel innate immune cells regulating the adaptive immune response, have further advanced the understanding of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. The current article discusses the evolution of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into cancer immunoediting and the advancement of cancer immunoediting alongside advances in immunology. For example, the emergence of the antigen-presenting cell (APC) concept, the discovery of dendritic cells (DCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), the tumor microenvironment (TME), innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), mast cells, and B cells have been critically discussed in the context of cancer immunoediting. Targeting these innate immune cells, along with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), comprises the most advanced forms of cancer immunotherapy.
- 26 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open Access25 Years of Cancer Immunoediting: From Immunosurveillance to Cancer Immunotherapies
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich first suggested that the immune system is critical for suppressing carcinogenesis and cancer growth, which led to the introduction of cancer immunosurveillance by Sir MacFarlane Burnet in 1960. Burnet’s cancer immunosurveillance was further supported and elaborated by Thomas Lewis in 1982, who noted, for example, the limitations of investigating cancer immunosurveillance in available experimental models, except for virus-induced cancers. The concept of cancer immunosurveillance in 2001 was revised to cancer immunoediting, based on findings that the immune system not only controls tumorigenesis and tumor growth but also tumor quality or immunogenicity. Advances in immunology, including the identification of target organs and the local immune system, and the identification of novel innate immune cells regulating the adaptive immune response, have further advanced the understanding of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. The current article discusses the evolution of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis into cancer immunoediting and the advancement of cancer immunoediting alongside advances in immunology. For example, the emergence of the antigen-presenting cell (APC) concept, the discovery of dendritic cells (DCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), the tumor microenvironment (TME), innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), mast cells, and B cells have been critically discussed in the context of cancer immunoediting. Targeting these innate immune cells, along with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), comprises the most advanced forms of cancer immunotherapy.
- Open Access
Comparative Proteomic Profiling of Responses to Standard Systemic Treatment Regimens in Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 13.3%. First-line treatment relies on two chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX (FOLFNX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEMPAC). However, direct clinical comparisons between these regimens have yielded inconsistent results across survival and toxicity endpoints, and the molecular basis of heterogeneous treatment responses remains poorly defined. To investigate regimen-specific tumor-cell-intrinsic mechanisms, we performed quantitative proteomic profiling of a primary PDAC-derived MIA PaCa-2 cell line following treatment with FOLFNX or GEMPAC. Differentially expressed proteins were analyzed using Gene Ontology, KEGG, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to define pathway-level alterations, and findings were contextualized using TCGA transcriptomic data. Proteomic analyses revealed that FOLFNX and GEMPAC engage in distinct cytotoxic programs. FOLFNX predominantly suppressed ribosome biogenesis and mitochondrial translation, consistent with sustained metabolic and biosynthetic stress, whereas GEMPAC preferentially disrupted mitotic cytokinesis and phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthesis, consistent with mitotic failure. Integration with TCGA data showed that FOLFNX-altered proteins aligned with favorable prognostic expression signatures, whereas GEMPAC-associated proteins were enriched among adverse profiles, reflecting engagement of distinct tumor-intrinsic programs. Together, these findings provide mechanistic insight into differential chemotherapy responses and establish a foundation for proteomics-based biomarkers to guide personalized chemotherapy selection in PDAC.
Open AccessComparative Proteomic Profiling of Responses to Standard Systemic Treatment Regimens in Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of 13.3%. First-line treatment relies on two chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX (FOLFNX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEMPAC). However, direct clinical comparisons between these regimens have yielded inconsistent results across survival and toxicity endpoints, and the molecular basis of heterogeneous treatment responses remains poorly defined. To investigate regimen-specific tumor-cell-intrinsic mechanisms, we performed quantitative proteomic profiling of a primary PDAC-derived MIA PaCa-2 cell line following treatment with FOLFNX or GEMPAC. Differentially expressed proteins were analyzed using Gene Ontology, KEGG, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to define pathway-level alterations, and findings were contextualized using TCGA transcriptomic data. Proteomic analyses revealed that FOLFNX and GEMPAC engage in distinct cytotoxic programs. FOLFNX predominantly suppressed ribosome biogenesis and mitochondrial translation, consistent with sustained metabolic and biosynthetic stress, whereas GEMPAC preferentially disrupted mitotic cytokinesis and phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthesis, consistent with mitotic failure. Integration with TCGA data showed that FOLFNX-altered proteins aligned with favorable prognostic expression signatures, whereas GEMPAC-associated proteins were enriched among adverse profiles, reflecting engagement of distinct tumor-intrinsic programs. Together, these findings provide mechanistic insight into differential chemotherapy responses and establish a foundation for proteomics-based biomarkers to guide personalized chemotherapy selection in PDAC.
- Open Access
- 9 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 33 (6) , 4902-4904
From Description to Action: A Roadmap for Dismantling Cancer Disparities in Surgical Oncology
- 9 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 33 (6) , 4902-4904
Open AccessFrom Description to Action: A Roadmap for Dismantling Cancer Disparities in Surgical Oncology
- Open Access
- 12 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Therapy Oncology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 201111
Safety and feasibility of talimogene laherparepvec in peritoneal surface malignancies: Results from the TEMPO trial
- 12 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Therapy Oncology
- Vol. 34 (1) , 201111
Open AccessSafety and feasibility of talimogene laherparepvec in peritoneal surface malignancies: Results from the TEMPO trial
- Open Access
Viewing Inflammation and Immunoregulation Under the Calpain System Lens
The controlled pro-inflammatory immune response is critical for fighting against external and endogenous threats, such as microbes/pathogens, allergens, xenobiotics, various antigens, and dying host cells and their mediators (DNA, RNA, and nuclear proteins) released into the circulation and cytosol (PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs). Several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and their downstream adaptor molecules, expressed by innate and adaptive immune cells, are critical in generating the inflammatory immune response by recognizing PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs. However, their dysregulation may predispose the host to develop inflammation-associated organ damage, neurodegeneration, autoimmunity, cancer, and even death due to the absence of the inflammation resolution phase. The cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) level regulates the survival, proliferation, and immunological functions of immune cells. Cysteine-rich proteases, specifically calpains, are Ca2+-dependent proteases that become activated during inflammatory conditions, playing a critical role in the inflammatory process and associated organ damage. Therefore, this article discusses the expression and function of calpain-1 and calpain-2 (ubiquitous calpains) in various innate (epithelial, endothelial, dendritic, mast, and NK cells, as well as macrophages) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells, affecting inflammation and immune regulation. As inflammatory diseases are on the rise due to several factors, such as environment, lifestyle, and an aging population, we must not just investigate but strive for a deeper understanding of the inflammation and immunoregulation under the calpain system (calpain-1 and calpain-2 and their endogenous negative regulator calpastatin) lens, which is ubiquitous and senses cytosolic Ca2+ changes to impact immune response.
Open AccessViewing Inflammation and Immunoregulation Under the Calpain System Lens
The controlled pro-inflammatory immune response is critical for fighting against external and endogenous threats, such as microbes/pathogens, allergens, xenobiotics, various antigens, and dying host cells and their mediators (DNA, RNA, and nuclear proteins) released into the circulation and cytosol (PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs). Several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and their downstream adaptor molecules, expressed by innate and adaptive immune cells, are critical in generating the inflammatory immune response by recognizing PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs. However, their dysregulation may predispose the host to develop inflammation-associated organ damage, neurodegeneration, autoimmunity, cancer, and even death due to the absence of the inflammation resolution phase. The cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) level regulates the survival, proliferation, and immunological functions of immune cells. Cysteine-rich proteases, specifically calpains, are Ca2+-dependent proteases that become activated during inflammatory conditions, playing a critical role in the inflammatory process and associated organ damage. Therefore, this article discusses the expression and function of calpain-1 and calpain-2 (ubiquitous calpains) in various innate (epithelial, endothelial, dendritic, mast, and NK cells, as well as macrophages) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells, affecting inflammation and immune regulation. As inflammatory diseases are on the rise due to several factors, such as environment, lifestyle, and an aging population, we must not just investigate but strive for a deeper understanding of the inflammation and immunoregulation under the calpain system (calpain-1 and calpain-2 and their endogenous negative regulator calpastatin) lens, which is ubiquitous and senses cytosolic Ca2+ changes to impact immune response.
- 30 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 251, 116639
Now More than Ever
- 30 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 251, 116639
Now More than Ever
- Open Access
- 30 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Viewing Inflammation and Immunoregulation Under the Calpain System Lens
The controlled pro-inflammatory immune response is critical for fighting against external and endogenous threats, such as microbes/pathogens, allergens, xenobiotics, various antigens, and dying host cells and their mediators (DNA, RNA, and nuclear proteins) released into the circulation and cytosol (PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs). Several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and their downstream adaptor molecules, expressed by innate and adaptive immune cells, are critical in generating the inflammatory immune response by recognizing PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs. However, their dysregulation may predispose the host to develop inflammation-associated organ damage, neurodegeneration, autoimmunity, cancer, and even death due to the absence of the inflammation resolution phase. The cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) level regulates the survival, proliferation, and immunological functions of immune cells. Cysteine-rich proteases, specifically calpains, are Ca2+-dependent proteases that become activated during inflammatory conditions, playing a critical role in the inflammatory process and associated organ damage. Therefore, this article discusses the expression and function of calpains 1 and 2 (ubiquitous calpains) in various innate (epithelial, endothelial, dendritic, mast, and NK cells, as well as macrophages) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells, affecting inflammation and immune regulation. As inflammatory diseases are on the rise due to several factors, such as environment, lifestyle, and an aging population, we must not just investigate, but strive for a deeper understanding of the inflammation and immunoregulation under the calpain system (calpain 1 and 2 and their endogenous negative regulator calpastatin) lens, which is ubiquitous and senses cytosolic Ca2+ changes to impact immune response.
- 30 September 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessViewing Inflammation and Immunoregulation Under the Calpain System Lens
The controlled pro-inflammatory immune response is critical for fighting against external and endogenous threats, such as microbes/pathogens, allergens, xenobiotics, various antigens, and dying host cells and their mediators (DNA, RNA, and nuclear proteins) released into the circulation and cytosol (PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs). Several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and their downstream adaptor molecules, expressed by innate and adaptive immune cells, are critical in generating the inflammatory immune response by recognizing PAMPs, MAMPs, and DAMPs. However, their dysregulation may predispose the host to develop inflammation-associated organ damage, neurodegeneration, autoimmunity, cancer, and even death due to the absence of the inflammation resolution phase. The cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) level regulates the survival, proliferation, and immunological functions of immune cells. Cysteine-rich proteases, specifically calpains, are Ca2+-dependent proteases that become activated during inflammatory conditions, playing a critical role in the inflammatory process and associated organ damage. Therefore, this article discusses the expression and function of calpains 1 and 2 (ubiquitous calpains) in various innate (epithelial, endothelial, dendritic, mast, and NK cells, as well as macrophages) and adaptive (T and B cells) immune cells, affecting inflammation and immune regulation. As inflammatory diseases are on the rise due to several factors, such as environment, lifestyle, and an aging population, we must not just investigate, but strive for a deeper understanding of the inflammation and immunoregulation under the calpain system (calpain 1 and 2 and their endogenous negative regulator calpastatin) lens, which is ubiquitous and senses cytosolic Ca2+ changes to impact immune response.
- 2 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 251, 116503
Statement from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons (SBAS) affirming our commitment to excellence for all
- 2 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 251, 116503
Statement from the Society of Black Academic Surgeons (SBAS) affirming our commitment to excellence for all