Ruud H. Teunter
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Ruud H. Teunter has a total of 97 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jasper Veldman
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
7 shared publications Stuart X. Zhu
6 shared publicationsAris A. Syntetos
5 shared publicationsM. Zied Babai
5 shared publicationsMeng Wu
Sichuan Univ, Sch Business, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
5 shared publications- Stuart X. Zhu
Department of Operations, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 297
Deriving near-optimality conditions using approximation procedures for an inventory control system with lost sales
- 21 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 297
Open AccessDeriving near-optimality conditions using approximation procedures for an inventory control system with lost sales
- Open Access
- 4 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Operational Research
- Vol. 330 (3) , 914-924
Strategic inventories under the reference price effect
- 4 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Operational Research
- Vol. 330 (3) , 914-924
Open AccessStrategic inventories under the reference price effect
- Open Access
- 26 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 249
The data-driven newsvendor problem: Achieving on-target service-levels using distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization
- 26 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 249
Open AccessThe data-driven newsvendor problem: Achieving on-target service-levels using distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization
- Open Access
- 1 October 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Vol. 214
Joint condition-based maintenance and condition-based production optimization
- 1 October 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Vol. 214
Open AccessJoint condition-based maintenance and condition-based production optimization
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
- Vol. 22 (4) , 792-811
Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk
Problem Definition: Many production systems deteriorate over time as a result of load and stress caused by production. The deterioration rate of these systems typically depends on the production rate, implying that the equipment’s deterioration rate can be controlled by adjusting the production rate. We introduce the use of condition monitoring to dynamically adjust the production rate to minimize maintenance costs and maximize production revenues. We study a single-unit system for which the next maintenance action is scheduled upfront. Academic/Practical Relevance: Condition-based maintenance decisions are frequently seen in the literature. However, in many real-life systems, maintenance planning has limited flexibility and cannot be done last minute. As an alternative, we are the first to propose using condition information to optimize the production rate, which is a more flexible short-term decision. Methodology: We derive structural optimality results from the analysis of deterministic deterioration processes. A Markov decision process formulation of the problem is used to obtain numerical results for stochastic deterioration processes. Results: The structure of the optimal policy strongly depends on the (convex or concave) relation between the production rate and the corresponding deterioration rate. Condition-based production rate decisions result in significant cost savings (by up to 50%), achieved by better balancing the failure risk and production output. For several systems a win-win scenario is observed, with both reduced failure risk and increased expected total production. Furthermore, condition-based production rates increase robustness and lead to more stable profits and production output. Managerial Implications: Using condition information to dynamically adjust production rates provides opportunities to improve the operational performance of systems with production-dependent deterioration.
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
- Vol. 22 (4) , 792-811
Condition-Based Production Planning: Adjusting Production Rates to Balance Output and Failure Risk
Problem Definition: Many production systems deteriorate over time as a result of load and stress caused by production. The deterioration rate of these systems typically depends on the production rate, implying that the equipment’s deterioration rate can be controlled by adjusting the production rate. We introduce the use of condition monitoring to dynamically adjust the production rate to minimize maintenance costs and maximize production revenues. We study a single-unit system for which the next maintenance action is scheduled upfront. Academic/Practical Relevance: Condition-based maintenance decisions are frequently seen in the literature. However, in many real-life systems, maintenance planning has limited flexibility and cannot be done last minute. As an alternative, we are the first to propose using condition information to optimize the production rate, which is a more flexible short-term decision. Methodology: We derive structural optimality results from the analysis of deterministic deterioration processes. A Markov decision process formulation of the problem is used to obtain numerical results for stochastic deterioration processes. Results: The structure of the optimal policy strongly depends on the (convex or concave) relation between the production rate and the corresponding deterioration rate. Condition-based production rate decisions result in significant cost savings (by up to 50%), achieved by better balancing the failure risk and production output. For several systems a win-win scenario is observed, with both reduced failure risk and increased expected total production. Furthermore, condition-based production rates increase robustness and lead to more stable profits and production output. Managerial Implications: Using condition information to dynamically adjust production rates provides opportunities to improve the operational performance of systems with production-dependent deterioration.
- 1 February 2020
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 220, 107305
Corrigendum to “A risk-averse competitive newsvendor problem under the CVaR criterion” [Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156 (2014) 13–23]
- 1 February 2020
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Production Economics
- Vol. 220, 107305
Corrigendum to “A risk-averse competitive newsvendor problem under the CVaR criterion” [Int. J. Prod. Econ. 156 (2014) 13–23]
- Open Access
- 10 January 2020
- Published by Wiley in Decision Sciences
- Vol. 52 (1) , 182-215
Advance Selling and Advertising: A Newsvendor Framework
Many firms offer consumers the opportunity to place advance orders at a discount when introducing a new product to the market. Doing so has two main advantages. First, it can increase total expected sales by exploiting valuation uncertainty of the consumers at the advance ordering stage. Second, total sales can be estimated more accurately based on the observed advance orders, reducing the need for safety stock and thereby obsolescence cost. In this research, we derive new insights into trading off these benefits against the loss in revenue from selling at a discount at the advance stage. In particular, we are the first to explore whether firms should advertise the advance ordering opportunity. We obtain several structural insights into the optimal policy, which we show is driven by two dimensions: the fraction of consumers who potentially buy in advance (i.e., strategic consumers) and the size of the discount needed to make them buy in advance. If the discount is below some threshold, then firms should sell in advance and they should advertise that option if the fraction of strategic consumers is sufficiently large. If the discount is above the threshold, then firms should not advertise and only sell in advance if the fraction of strategic consumers is sufficiently small. Graphical displays based on the two dimensions provide further insights.
- 10 January 2020
- Published by Wiley in Decision Sciences
- Vol. 52 (1) , 182-215
Open AccessAdvance Selling and Advertising: A Newsvendor Framework
Many firms offer consumers the opportunity to place advance orders at a discount when introducing a new product to the market. Doing so has two main advantages. First, it can increase total expected sales by exploiting valuation uncertainty of the consumers at the advance ordering stage. Second, total sales can be estimated more accurately based on the observed advance orders, reducing the need for safety stock and thereby obsolescence cost. In this research, we derive new insights into trading off these benefits against the loss in revenue from selling at a discount at the advance stage. In particular, we are the first to explore whether firms should advertise the advance ordering opportunity. We obtain several structural insights into the optimal policy, which we show is driven by two dimensions: the fraction of consumers who potentially buy in advance (i.e., strategic consumers) and the size of the discount needed to make them buy in advance. If the discount is below some threshold, then firms should sell in advance and they should advertise that option if the fraction of strategic consumers is sufficiently large. If the discount is above the threshold, then firms should not advertise and only sell in advance if the fraction of strategic consumers is sufficiently small. Graphical displays based on the two dimensions provide further insights.