Alana Weber
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Alana Weber has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aaron Mrotek
PRESS Project, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 5694, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
1 shared publication - Abigail DeBofsky
Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
1 shared publication - Alejandro Eduardo Jorge Valenzuela
Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (ICPA), Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Ushuaia, Argentina
1 shared publication - Christopher B. Anderson
Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (ICPA), Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Ushuaia, Argentina
1 shared publication - David M. Janz
Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
1 shared publication - Erik Nielsen
School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, 624 S Knoles Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 19 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 212 (Pt A) , 113151
Effects of in situ experimental selenium exposure on finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus) gut microbiome
- 19 March 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Research
- Vol. 212 (Pt A) , 113151
Effects of in situ experimental selenium exposure on finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus) gut microbiome
- 15 August 2019
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Environmental Conservation
- Vol. 46 (4) , 326-333
An evaluation of local, national and international perceptions of benefits and threats to nature in Tierra del Fuego National Park (Patagonia, Argentina)
Environmental scientists and managers increasingly recognize that socio-cultural evaluations expand the understanding of human–nature relationships. Here, user groups’ perceptions of the benefits from and threats to nature were analysed in Tierra del Fuego National Park, Argentina. We hypothesized that the different relationships of users to this place would lead to significantly different valuations among local Ushuaia residents (n = 122), Argentine nationals (n = 147) and international tourists (n = 294). All users perceived a broad spectrum of benefits. The three groups assessed intrinsic and relational values more highly than instrumental benefits, and significant differences included a higher mean valuation of benefits by Argentine visitors. Overall, threats were less perceived than benefits, and significant differences included a higher mean threat assessment by Ushuaia residents. To explain these relationships, we found that mean valuations of benefits and threats were weakly related to increased biodiversity knowledge for residents and international tourists, but not for Argentine visitors. These findings can orient environmental management in Patagonia and elsewhere by identifying areas where information can improve user experiences and by contributing a more pluralistic understanding of nature from multiple stakeholders.
- 15 August 2019
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Environmental Conservation
- Vol. 46 (4) , 326-333
An evaluation of local, national and international perceptions of benefits and threats to nature in Tierra del Fuego National Park (Patagonia, Argentina)
Environmental scientists and managers increasingly recognize that socio-cultural evaluations expand the understanding of human–nature relationships. Here, user groups’ perceptions of the benefits from and threats to nature were analysed in Tierra del Fuego National Park, Argentina. We hypothesized that the different relationships of users to this place would lead to significantly different valuations among local Ushuaia residents (n = 122), Argentine nationals (n = 147) and international tourists (n = 294). All users perceived a broad spectrum of benefits. The three groups assessed intrinsic and relational values more highly than instrumental benefits, and significant differences included a higher mean valuation of benefits by Argentine visitors. Overall, threats were less perceived than benefits, and significant differences included a higher mean threat assessment by Ushuaia residents. To explain these relationships, we found that mean valuations of benefits and threats were weakly related to increased biodiversity knowledge for residents and international tourists, but not for Argentine visitors. These findings can orient environmental management in Patagonia and elsewhere by identifying areas where information can improve user experiences and by contributing a more pluralistic understanding of nature from multiple stakeholders.