RRRoss A. Rowsey

Ross A. Rowsey

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ross A. Rowsey has a total of 34 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    False-positive XXY results by interphase FISH in cytogenetically normal XX individuals: two cases highlighting the necessity of additional laboratory follow-up

    by Qiliang Ding, Abigail L. Bronson, Kyna A. Byerly, Anna A. Essendrup, Elyse B. Mitchell, Cassandra K. Runke, Ross A. Rowsey, Nicole L. Hoppman

    Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is commonly used for rapid aneuploidy detection in clinical settings. While FISH-based aneuploidy detection provides rapid results desirable for patient management, it usually only utilizes one probe per chromosome, which may lead to rare false-positive findings. Here we report two interphase FISH results, which were false-positive for XXY in cytogenetically normal XX individuals. Both false-positive cases were due to hybridization of the Y chromosome centromeric probe DYZ3 to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 15. In both cases, chromosomal microarray revealed no detectable Y chromosome material, suggesting the hybridizations of the DYZ3 probe to chromosome 15 likely represent benign heterochromatic variants of no clinical significance. In one case, the DYZ3 hybridization was also identified in the phenotypically unaffected mother, further suggesting this is likely a rare variant of no clinical significance. This report marks the first documentation of hybridization of the DYZ3 probe to another chromosome in cytogenetically normal individuals. Our report has important clinical implications, because DYZ3 is widely used by clinical laboratories for Y chromosome detection. Our findings underscore the necessity of confirming abnormal aneuploidy detection FISH results with additional laboratory methods such as chromosomal microarray analysis.

  • Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosomal microarray as a diagnostic tool for mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: A validation study

    by Kaitlyn J. Nielson, Ross Rowsey, Surendra Dasari, William R. Sukov, Benjamin R. Kipp, Aditya Raghunathan, Rumeal D. Whaley, Kingsley Ebare, Melissa L. Stanton, Jordan P. Reynolds, et al.


  • Laboratory Testing for Prader-Willi Syndrome

    by Nicole L. Hoppman, Elena Repnikova, Ross A. Rowsey

  • Cytogenetics of spermatocytic tumors with a discussion of gain of chromosome 12p in anaplastic variants

    by Sounak Gupta, Ayesha Farooq, Ross A. Rowsey, Muhammad A. Rahman, Wei Shen, Loren Herrera-Hernandez, Aditya Raghunathan, R. Houston Thompson, Stephen A. Boorjian, Bradley C. Leibovich, et al.


  • Open Access

    Coverage profile correction of shallow-depth circulating cell-free DNA sequencing via multi-distance learning

    by Nicholas B. Larson, Melissa C. Larson, Jie Na, Carlos P Sosa, Chen Wang, Jean-Pierre Kocher, Ross Rowsey

    Shallow-depth whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is a popular approach for non-invasive genomic screening assays, including liquid biopsy for early detection of invasive tumors as well as non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for common fetal trisomies. In contrast to nuclear DNA WGS, ccfDNA WGS exhibits extensive inter- and intra-sample coverage variability that is not fully explained by typical sources of variation in WGS, such as GC content. This variability may inflate false positive and false negative screening rates of copy-number alterations and aneuploidy, particularly if these features are present at a relatively low proportion of total sequenced content. Herein, we propose an empirically-driven coverage correction strategy that leverages prior annotation information in a multi-distance learning context to improve within-sample coverage profile correction. Specifically, we train a weighted k-nearest neighbors-style method on non-pregnant female donor ccfDNA WGS samples, and apply it to NIPS samples to evaluate coverage profile variability reduction. We additionally characterize improvement in the discrimination of positive fetal trisomy cases relative to normal controls, and compare our results against a more traditional regression-based approach to profile coverage correction based on GC content and mappability. Under cross-validation, performance measures indicated benefit to combining the two feature sets relative to either in isolation. We also observed substantial improvement in coverage profile variability reduction in leave-out clinical NIPS samples, with variability reduced by 26.5-53.5% relative to the standard regression-based method as quantified by median absolute deviation. Finally, we observed improvement discrimination for screening positive trisomy cases reducing ccfDNA WGS coverage variability while additionally improving NIPS trisomy screening assay performance. Overall, our results indicate that machine learning approaches can substantially improve ccfDNA WGS coverage profile correction and downstream analyses.