Parul Dayal
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Parul Dayal has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Aaron M. Ulmer
Center for Health and Technology, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento
2 shared publicationsBrad H. Pollock
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento
2 shared publicationsCelia H. Chang
Department of Neurology, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento
2 shared publicationsJames P. Marcin
Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento
2 shared publicationsJeffrey S. Hoch
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento
2 shared publicationsLeslie Warner
Shasta Community Health Center, Redding, California
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 2 August 2019
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 2 (8) , e199364
Hospital Utilization Among Rural Children Served by Pediatric Neurology Telemedicine Clinics
Limited access to outpatient pediatric neurology care can lead to inconsistent management of patients’ medical conditions and may result in unplanned hospital encounters, including visits to the emergency department (ED) and hospital admissions.1-8 For children, appropriate access to outpatient care is hindered by the shortage of pediatric neurologists across the country.9 Confounding these shortages is the fact that pediatric subspecialists are concentrated at tertiary care centers located primarily in urban areas,10-12 forcing children with neurologic disorders living in rural communities to travel long distances to see the nearest pediatric neurologist.
- 2 August 2019
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 2 (8) , e199364
Open AccessHospital Utilization Among Rural Children Served by Pediatric Neurology Telemedicine Clinics
Limited access to outpatient pediatric neurology care can lead to inconsistent management of patients’ medical conditions and may result in unplanned hospital encounters, including visits to the emergency department (ED) and hospital admissions.1-8 For children, appropriate access to outpatient care is hindered by the shortage of pediatric neurologists across the country.9 Confounding these shortages is the fact that pediatric subspecialists are concentrated at tertiary care centers located primarily in urban areas,10-12 forcing children with neurologic disorders living in rural communities to travel long distances to see the nearest pediatric neurologist.
- 1 August 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Clinical Practice
- Vol. 9 (4) , 314-321
Appointment completion in pediatric neurology telemedicine clinics serving underserved patients
Background To determine whether telemedicine improves access to outpatient neurology care for underserved patients, we compared appointment completion between urban, in-person clinics and telemedicine clinics held in rural and underserved communities where neurology consultations are provided remotely. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified patients scheduled for outpatient care from UCDH pediatric neurologists between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2017, in person and by telemedicine. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from electronic medical records. We evaluated the association between consultation modality and visit completion in overall and matched samples using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Results We analyzed 13,311 in-person appointments by 3,831 patients and 1,158 telemedicine appointments by 381 patients. The average travel time to the site of care was 45.8 ± 52.1 minutes for the in-person cohort and 22.3 ± 22.7 minutes for the telemedicine cohort. Telemedicine sites were located at an average travel time of 217.1 ± 114.8 minutes from UCDH. Telemedicine patients were more likely to have nonprivate insurance, lower education, and lower household income. They had different diagnoses and fewer complex chronic conditions. Telemedicine visits were more likely to be completed than either “cancelled” or missed (“no show”) compared with in-person visits (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34–1.83; OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31–2.10 matched on travel time to the site of care; OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.66–2.98 matched on travel time to UCDH). Conclusions The use of telemedicine for outpatient pediatric neurology visits has high odds of completion and can serve as an equal adjunct to in-person clinic visits.
- 1 August 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology Clinical Practice
- Vol. 9 (4) , 314-321
Appointment completion in pediatric neurology telemedicine clinics serving underserved patients
Background To determine whether telemedicine improves access to outpatient neurology care for underserved patients, we compared appointment completion between urban, in-person clinics and telemedicine clinics held in rural and underserved communities where neurology consultations are provided remotely. Methods In this retrospective study, we identified patients scheduled for outpatient care from UCDH pediatric neurologists between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2017, in person and by telemedicine. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted from electronic medical records. We evaluated the association between consultation modality and visit completion in overall and matched samples using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Results We analyzed 13,311 in-person appointments by 3,831 patients and 1,158 telemedicine appointments by 381 patients. The average travel time to the site of care was 45.8 ± 52.1 minutes for the in-person cohort and 22.3 ± 22.7 minutes for the telemedicine cohort. Telemedicine sites were located at an average travel time of 217.1 ± 114.8 minutes from UCDH. Telemedicine patients were more likely to have nonprivate insurance, lower education, and lower household income. They had different diagnoses and fewer complex chronic conditions. Telemedicine visits were more likely to be completed than either “cancelled” or missed (“no show”) compared with in-person visits (OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.34–1.83; OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.31–2.10 matched on travel time to the site of care; OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.66–2.98 matched on travel time to UCDH). Conclusions The use of telemedicine for outpatient pediatric neurology visits has high odds of completion and can serve as an equal adjunct to in-person clinic visits.