Stephanie Bor
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Stephanie Bor has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Richard Wright
Department of Linguistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2 shared publications Björn Lidestam
1 shared publicationChristi W. Miller
1 shared publicationElaine Hoi Ning Ng
1 shared publicationFrederick J. Gallun
1 shared publicationHenrik Danielsson
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2008
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 51 (5) , 1315-1327
Multichannel Compression: Effects of Reduced Spectral Contrast on Vowel Identification
Purpose To clarify if large numbers of wide dynamic range compression channels provide advantages for vowel identification and to measure its acoustic effects. Methods Eight vowels produced by 12 talkers in the /hVd/ context were compressed using 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 channels. Formant contrast indices (mean formant peak minus mean formant trough; maximum formant peak minus minimum formant trough) were developed to quantify spectral changes. Twenty listeners with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss identified the compressed vowels in an 8-alternative forced-choice procedure. Results Formant contrast measures revealed significant spectral flattening for 6 of the 8 vowels as channel number increased. A significant decrease in vowel identification performance was also observed as spectral contrast decreased. Conclusions Increasing the number of wide dynamic range compression channels may not be beneficial for all speech signals, and individual vowel identification performance can vary greatly for listeners with similar hearing loss.
- 1 October 2008
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 51 (5) , 1315-1327
Multichannel Compression: Effects of Reduced Spectral Contrast on Vowel Identification
Purpose To clarify if large numbers of wide dynamic range compression channels provide advantages for vowel identification and to measure its acoustic effects. Methods Eight vowels produced by 12 talkers in the /hVd/ context were compressed using 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 channels. Formant contrast indices (mean formant peak minus mean formant trough; maximum formant peak minus minimum formant trough) were developed to quantify spectral changes. Twenty listeners with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss identified the compressed vowels in an 8-alternative forced-choice procedure. Results Formant contrast measures revealed significant spectral flattening for 6 of the 8 vowels as channel number increased. A significant decrease in vowel identification performance was also observed as spectral contrast decreased. Conclusions Increasing the number of wide dynamic range compression channels may not be beneficial for all speech signals, and individual vowel identification performance can vary greatly for listeners with similar hearing loss.
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 123 (5_Suppleme) , 3864
Consequences of regional accent differences for speech perception studies
Sociophonetic research has demonstrated effects of regional accent on vowels. However, little attention is paid to regional accent in hearing and speech perception studies that use standard vowel stimuli. This poster illustrates the importance of these factors to perception. A library of synthetic vowels from nine different regions of the U.S. (e.g., southern California, upper Midwest) was generated according to published formant values. The vowels were categorized into three groups (near, medium, far) according to Euclidean distance in an F1 by F2 space relative to Pacific Northwest (PNW) vowels. Based on several experimental factors, two vowel pairs representing the high back and low front vowels were chosen as stimuli. The near, medium and far exemplars and PNW exemplars were presented to native PNW listeners in a forced‐choice identification task. Dependent variables were identification accuracy and reaction time. Task difficulty was manipulated using background noise level. Results indicate that recognition scores were poorer, and reaction time was longer, for vowels that were spectrally distant from the listener's regional accent. These data suggest that researchers should take into account regional accent in selecting vowel stimuli or generating synthetic vowels for general‐use speech perception tests. Supported by NIDCD (DC00033, RO1 DC006014).
- 1 May 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 123 (5_Suppleme) , 3864
Consequences of regional accent differences for speech perception studies
Sociophonetic research has demonstrated effects of regional accent on vowels. However, little attention is paid to regional accent in hearing and speech perception studies that use standard vowel stimuli. This poster illustrates the importance of these factors to perception. A library of synthetic vowels from nine different regions of the U.S. (e.g., southern California, upper Midwest) was generated according to published formant values. The vowels were categorized into three groups (near, medium, far) according to Euclidean distance in an F1 by F2 space relative to Pacific Northwest (PNW) vowels. Based on several experimental factors, two vowel pairs representing the high back and low front vowels were chosen as stimuli. The near, medium and far exemplars and PNW exemplars were presented to native PNW listeners in a forced‐choice identification task. Dependent variables were identification accuracy and reaction time. Task difficulty was manipulated using background noise level. Results indicate that recognition scores were poorer, and reaction time was longer, for vowels that were spectrally distant from the listener's regional accent. These data suggest that researchers should take into account regional accent in selecting vowel stimuli or generating synthetic vowels for general‐use speech perception tests. Supported by NIDCD (DC00033, RO1 DC006014).