David Shasha
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
David Shasha has a total of 32 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Dror Hacham
Central Laboratory, Meuhedet Health Services, Lod, Israel
2 shared publicationsGeorge Prajgrod
Central Laboratory, Meuhedet Health Services, Lod, Israel
2 shared publicationsYael Paran
Infectious Disease Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
2 shared publicationsA. Glatman-Freedman
Israel Centre for Disease Control, Israel Ministry of Health, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
1 shared publicationA. Toledano
Meuhedet Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
1 shared publication- Amir Bar-Shai
Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 30 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Infection
- Vol. 89 (6) , 106340
High rates of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis species in children’s stool but minor clinical significance
- 30 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Infection
- Vol. 89 (6) , 106340
Open AccessHigh rates of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis species in children’s stool but minor clinical significance
- Open Access
The Impact of FDA-Approved Novel Agents for Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease on Treatment Patterns and Outcomes—A Single-Center Longitudinal Cohort Analysis
Objectives—chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We aimed to analyze advances in treatment strategy and outcomes during the last decade due to the incorporation of novel immunosuppressive therapy (IST) drugs in the armamentarium. Methods—we retrospectively analyzed all patients > 18 years with cGVHD after their first hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) between 2012 and 2020 (n = 91), divided into three treatment periods: 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020 (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Results—mean cumulative steroid dose and dose/total cGVHD-treatment days was lower in groups 2–3 compared to 1 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.042, respectively). The median IST-free survival was 79 (95%CI54–94) months, with more patients in group 3 (47% (95%CI 25–54%) discontinuing IST at 3 years, p = 0.1). Groups 2–3 compared to 1 had better glycemic control (p < 0.01), higher bone density (p = 0.06), and fewer cardiovascular events. The number of admissions/patient dropped from 0.7/year in group 1 to 0.24/year and 0.36/year in groups 2–3, respectively (p = 0.36). Employment reintegration was higher in groups 2–3 compared with 1 (p = 0.05) and so was earlier return to work (p = 0.01). There were no differences in survival outcomes. Conclusions—the incorporation of novel agents appears to be associated with reduced overall steroid burden, improved cGVHD control, and fewer long-term side effects.
Open AccessThe Impact of FDA-Approved Novel Agents for Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease on Treatment Patterns and Outcomes—A Single-Center Longitudinal Cohort Analysis
Objectives—chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We aimed to analyze advances in treatment strategy and outcomes during the last decade due to the incorporation of novel immunosuppressive therapy (IST) drugs in the armamentarium. Methods—we retrospectively analyzed all patients > 18 years with cGVHD after their first hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) between 2012 and 2020 (n = 91), divided into three treatment periods: 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020 (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Results—mean cumulative steroid dose and dose/total cGVHD-treatment days was lower in groups 2–3 compared to 1 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.042, respectively). The median IST-free survival was 79 (95%CI54–94) months, with more patients in group 3 (47% (95%CI 25–54%) discontinuing IST at 3 years, p = 0.1). Groups 2–3 compared to 1 had better glycemic control (p < 0.01), higher bone density (p = 0.06), and fewer cardiovascular events. The number of admissions/patient dropped from 0.7/year in group 1 to 0.24/year and 0.36/year in groups 2–3, respectively (p = 0.36). Employment reintegration was higher in groups 2–3 compared with 1 (p = 0.05) and so was earlier return to work (p = 0.01). There were no differences in survival outcomes. Conclusions—the incorporation of novel agents appears to be associated with reduced overall steroid burden, improved cGVHD control, and fewer long-term side effects.
- 6 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 30 (5) , 565-566
Safeguarding COVID-19 vaccines: establishing the safety of novel vaccine platforms
- 6 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 30 (5) , 565-566
Safeguarding COVID-19 vaccines: establishing the safety of novel vaccine platforms
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 30 (1) , 130-136
The clinical significance of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis in human stool—retrospective cohort study
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 30 (1) , 130-136
The clinical significance of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis in human stool—retrospective cohort study
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 26 (1) , 101-106
Quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine: clinical outcomes in two influenza seasons, historical cohort study
- 1 January 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
- Vol. 26 (1) , 101-106
Quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine: clinical outcomes in two influenza seasons, historical cohort study