RWRobert M. Wald

Robert M. Wald

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Robert M. Wald has a total of 1000 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes

    by A. G. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adamcewicz, S. Adhicary, D. Adhikari, N. Adhikari, R. X. Adhikari, V. K. Adkins, et al.

    The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses m 1 = 33.6 − 0.8 + 1.2 M ⊙ and m 2 = 32.2 − 1.3 + 0.8 M ⊙ , and small spins χ 1 , 2 ≤ 0.26 (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity e ≤ 0.03 . Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar ( ℓ = | m | = 2 ) mode of a Kerr black hole and its first overtone. We constrain the modes’ frequencies to ± 30 % of the Kerr spectrum, providing a test of the remnant’s Kerr nature. We also examine Hawking’s area law, also known as the second law of black hole mechanics, which states that the total area of the black hole event horizons cannot decrease with time. A range of analyses that exclude up to five of the strongest merger cycles confirm that the remnant area is larger than the sum of the initial areas to high credibility.


  • Open Access

    How to minimize the decoherence caused by black holes

    by Daine L. Danielson, Jonah Kudler-Flam, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald

    We consider an experimentalist, Alice, who creates a quantum superposition of a charged or massive body outside of a black hole (or, more generally, in the presence of a Killing horizon). It was previously shown that emission of soft photons/gravitons into the black hole will result in the decoherence of the components of the superposition if it is held open for a sufficiently long span of time. However, at any finite time, t c , during the process, it is not obvious how much decoherence has irrevocably occurred. Equivalently, it is not obvious how much information an observer inside the black hole can extract about Alice’s superposition prior to time t c . In this paper, we solve for the optimal experimental protocol to be followed by Alice for t > t c so as to minimize the decoherence of the components of her superposition. More precisely, given the entangling radiation that has passed through the horizon prior to the cross-section C corresponding to the time t = t c in Alice’s lab, we determine the “optimal purification” of this radiation beyond C such that the global quantum state of the radiation through the horizon has maximal overlap (quantum fidelity) with the Hartle-Hawking or Unruh vacuum. Due to the intricate low frequency entanglement structure of the quantum field theory vacuum state, we find this optimal purification to be nontrivial. In particular, even if Alice has already “closed” her superposition by bringing the components back together, we find that she can decrease the net decoherence of the components of her superposition somewhat by reopening it and performing further manipulations.


  • Open Access

    The Entropy of Black Holes

    by Robert M. Wald

    The remarkable connection between black holes and thermodynamics provides the most significant clues that we currently possess to the nature of black holes in a quantum theory of gravity. The key clue is the formula for the entropy of a black hole. I briefly review some recent work that provides an expression for a dynamical correction to the entropy of a black hole and briefly discuss some of the implications of this new formula for entropy.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Local description of decoherence of quantum superpositions by black holes and other bodies

    by Daine L. Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald

    It was previously shown that if an experimenter, Alice, puts a massive or charged body in a quantum spatial superposition, then the presence of a black hole (or more generally any Killing horizon) will eventually decohere the superposition. This decoherence was identified as resulting from the radiation of soft photons/gravitons through the horizon, thus suggesting that the global structure of the spacetime is essential for describing the decoherence. In this paper, we show that the decoherence can alternatively be described in terms of the local two-point function of the quantum field within Alice’s lab, without any direct reference to the horizon. From this point of view, the decoherence of Alice’s superposition in the presence of a black hole arises from the extremely low frequency Hawking quanta present in Alice’s lab. We explicitly calculate the decoherence occurring in Schwarzschild spacetime in the Unruh vacuum from the local viewpoint. We then use this viewpoint to elucidate (i) the differences in decoherence effects that would occur in Schwarzschild spacetime in the Boulware and Hartle-Hawking vacua; (ii) the difference in decoherence effects that would occur in Minkowski spacetime filled with a thermal bath as compared with Schwarzschild spacetime; (iii) the lack of decoherence in the spacetime of a static star even though the vacuum state outside the star is similar in many respects to the Boulware vacuum around a black hole; and (iv) the requirements on the degrees of freedom of a material body needed to produce a decoherence effect that mimics that of a black hole.


  • Open Access

    Entropy of dynamical black holes

    by Stefan Hollands, Robert M. Wald, Victor G. Zhang

    We propose a new formula for the entropy of a dynamical black hole—valid to leading order for perturbations off of a stationary black hole background—in an arbitrary classical diffeomorphism covariant Lagrangian theory of gravity in n dimensions. In stationary eras, this formula agrees with the usual Noether charge formula, but in nonstationary eras, we obtain a nontrivial correction term. In particular, in general relativity, our formula for the entropy of a dynamical black hole differs from the standard Bekenstein-Hawking formula A/4 by a term involving the integral of the expansion of the null generators of the horizon. We show that, to leading perturbative order, our dynamical entropy in general relativity is equal to 1/4 of the area of the apparent horizon. Our formula for entropy in a general theory of gravity is obtained from the requirement that a “local physical process version” of the first law of black hole thermodynamics hold for perturbations of a stationary black hole. It follows immediately that for first order perturbations sourced by external matter that satisfies the null energy condition, our entropy obeys the second law of black hole thermodynamics. For vacuum perturbations, the leading-order change in entropy occurs at second order in perturbation theory, and the second law is obeyed at leading order if and only if the modified canonical energy flux is positive (as is the case in general relativity but presumably would not hold in more general theories of gravity). Our formula for the entropy of a dynamical black hole differs from a formula proposed independently by Dong and by Wall. We obtain the general relationship between their formula and ours. We then consider the generalized second law in semiclassical gravity for first order perturbations of a stationary black hole. We show that the validity of the quantum null energy condition (QNEC) on a Killing horizon is equivalent to the generalized second law using our notion of black hole entropy but using a modified notion of von Neumann entropy for matter. On the other hand, the generalized second law for the Dong-Wall entropy is equivalent to an integrated version of QNEC, using the unmodified von Neumann entropy for the entropy of matter.


  • Open Access

    The Operator Product Expansion in Quantum Field Theory

    by Stefan Hollands, Robert M. Wald

    Operator product expansions (OPEs) in quantum field theory (QFT) provide an asymptotic relation between products of local fields defined at points $x_1, \dots, x_n$ and local fields at point $y$ in the limit $x_1, \dots, x_n \to y$. They thereby capture in a precise way the singular behavior of products of quantum fields at a point as well as their ``finite trends.'' In this article, we shall review the fundamental properties of OPEs and their role in the formulation of interacting QFT in curved spacetime, the ``flow relations'' in coupling parameters satisfied by the OPE coefficients, the role of OPEs in conformal field theories, and the manner in which general theorems -- specifically, the PCT theorem -- can be formulated using OPEs in a curved spacetime setting.


  • Open Access

    Killing horizons decohere quantum superpositions

    by Daine L. Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald

    We recently showed that if a massive (or charged) body is put in a quantum spatial superposition, the mere presence of a black hole in its vicinity will eventually decohere the superposition. In this paper we show that, more generally, decoherence of stationary superpositions will occur in any spacetime with a Killing horizon. This occurs because, in effect, the long-range field of the body is registered on the Killing horizon which, we show, necessitates a flux of “soft horizon gravitons/photons” through the horizon. The Killing horizon thereby harvests “which path” information of quantum superpositions and will decohere any quantum superposition in a finite time. It is particularly instructive to analyze the case of a uniformly accelerating body in a quantum superposition in flat spacetime. As we show, from the Rindler perspective the superposition is decohered by “soft gravitons/photons” that propagate through the Rindler horizon with negligible (Rindler) energy. We show that this decoherence effect is distinct from—and larger than—the decoherence resulting from the presence of Unruh radiation. We further show that from the inertial perspective, the decoherence is due to the radiation of high frequency (inertial) gravitons/photons to null infinity. (The notion of gravitons/photons that propagate through the Rindler horizon is the same notion as that of gravitons/photons that propagate to null infinity.) We also analyze the decoherence of a spatial superposition due to the presence of a cosmological horizon in de Sitter spacetime. We provide estimates of the decoherence time for such quantum superpositions in both the Rindler and cosmological cases. Although we explicitly treat the case of spacetime dimension d=4, our analysis applies to any dimension d≥4.


  • Open Access

    Killing Horizons Decohere Quantum Superpositions

    by Daine L. Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald

    We recently showed that if a massive (or charged) body is put in a quantum spatial superposition, the mere presence of a black hole in its vicinity will eventually decohere the superposition. In this paper we show that, more generally, decoherence of stationary superpositions will occur in any spacetime with a Killing horizon. This occurs because, in effect, the long-range field of the body is registered on the Killing horizon which, we show, necessitates a flux of "soft horizon gravitons/photons" through the horizon. The Killing horizon thereby harvests "which path" information of quantum superpositions and will decohere any quantum superposition in a finite time. It is particularly instructive to analyze the case of a uniformly accelerating body in a quantum superposition in flat spacetime. As we show, from the Rindler perspective the superposition is decohered by "soft gravitons/photons" that propagate through the Rindler horizon with negligible (Rindler) energy. We show that this decoherence effect is distinct from--and larger than--the decoherence resulting from the presence of Unruh radiation. We further show that from the inertial perspective, the decoherence is due to the radiation of high frequency (inertial) gravitons/photons to null infinity. (The notion of gravitons/photons that propagate through the Rindler horizon is the same notion as that of gravitons/photons that propagate to null infinity.) We also analyze the decoherence of a spatial superposition due to the presence of a cosmological horizon in de Sitter spacetime. We provide estimates of the decoherence time for such quantum superpositions in both the Rindler and cosmological cases. Although we explicitly treat the case of spacetime dimension $d=4$, our analysis applies to any dimension $d \geq 4$.

  • Open Access

    Gravitationally Mediated Entanglement: Newtonian Field vs. Gravitons

    by Daine L. Danielson, Gautam Satishchandran, Robert M. Wald

    We argue that if the Newtonian gravitational field of a body can mediate entanglement with another body, then it should also be possible for the body producing the Newtonian field to entangle directly with on-shell gravitons. Our arguments are made by revisiting a gedankenexperiment previously analyzed by Belenchia et al., which showed that a quantum superposition of a massive body requires both quantized gravitational radiation and local vacuum fluctuations of the spacetime metric in order to avoid contradictions with complementarity and causality. We provide a precise and rigorous description of the entanglement and decoherence effects occurring in this gedankenexperiment, thereby significantly improving upon the back-of-the-envelope estimates given in the analysis of Belenchia et al. and also showing that their conclusions are valid in much more general circumstances. As a by-product of our analysis, we show that under the protocols of the gedankenexperiment, there is no clear distinction between entanglement mediated by the Newtonian gravitational field of a body and entanglement mediated by on-shell gravitons emitted by the body. This suggests that Newtonian entanglement implies the existence of graviton entanglement and supports the view that the experimental discovery of Newtonian entanglement may be viewed as implying the existence of the graviton.