Foaad Khosmood

This study examines the design and delivery of an undergraduate Game Design elective tailored for students from non-computing disciplines. Conducted over three years in three editions of the same course, this study involves 215 students, 4 teaching staff members, and 9 teaching assistants. We outline the pedagogical approach adopted to support learners with limited technical backgrounds and describe the key learning activities implemented throughout the course. We present data on student perceptions and engagement, highlighting both successes and areas for improvement. We offer critical reflection on the challenges encountered, including balancing technical complexity with accessibility and fostering creative confidence. Finally, we share practical insights and recommendations for educators seeking to integrate authentic game development experiences into curricula for non-cognate learners.

Legislative hearings are distinct communication events with their own human recognizable structure and logic, yet they have been analyzed as distinct phenomena beyond their transcripts. Understanding legislative hearings at a deeper level is a major step in analyzing the work and power relationships within democratic bodies. In this work, we present a novel end-to-end pipeline for parsing rhetorical structures from legislative committee hearings with the goal of improving legislative discourse analysis and democratic accountability. We also propose a rhetorical structure grammar and find that 55.21% of California state bill discussions in our dataset can be parsed with this grammar. We evaluate our pipeline with two utterance section classifiers on a random subset of over 2,000 annotated utterances corresponding to 100 hearings. We find that a logistic regression-based classifier with grammar-based output masking and utterance tag smoothing outperforms more complex models, achieving an F1 score of 52.8% against our ground truth discourse section labels.

Humour styles can have either a negative or a positive impact on well-being. Given the importance of these styles to mental health, significant research has been conducted on their automatic identification. However, the automated machine learning models used for this purpose are black boxes, making their prediction decisions opaque. Clarity and transparency are vital in the field of mental health. This paper presents an explainable AI (XAI) framework for understanding humour style classification, building upon previous work in computational humour analysis. Using the best-performing single model (ALI+XGBoost) from prior research, we apply comprehensive XAI techniques to analyse how linguistic, emotional, and semantic features contribute to humour style classification decisions. Our analysis reveals distinct patterns in how different humour styles are characterised and misclassified, with particular emphasis on the challenges in distinguishing affiliative humour from other styles. Through detailed examination of feature importance, error patterns, and misclassification cases, we identify key factors influencing model decisions, including emotional ambiguity, context misinterpretation, and target identification. The framework demonstrates significant utility in understanding model behaviour, achieving interpretable insights into the complex interplay of features that define different humour styles. Our findings contribute to both the theoretical understanding of computational humour analysis and practical applications in mental health, content moderation, and digital humanities research.

In this work, we introduce several schemes to leverage description-augmented embedding similarity for dataless intent classification using current state-of-the-art (SOTA) text embedding models. We report results of our methods on four commonly used intent classification datasets and compare against previous works of a similar nature. Our work shows promising results for dataless classification scaling to a large number of unseen intents. We show competitive results and significant improvements (+6.12\% Avg.) over strong zero-shot baselines, all without training on labelled or task-specific data. Furthermore, we provide qualitative error analysis of the shortfalls of this methodology to help guide future research in this area.

In this work, we present a new dataset and a computational strategy for a digital coach that aims to guide users in practicing the protocols of self-attachment therapy. Our framework augments a rule-based conversational agent with a deep-learning classifier for identifying the underlying emotion in a user's text response, as well as a deep-learning assisted retrieval method for producing novel, fluent and empathetic utterances. We also craft a set of human-like personas that users can choose to interact with. Our goal is to achieve a high level of engagement during virtual therapy sessions. We evaluate the effectiveness of our framework in a non-clinical trial with N=16 participants, all of whom have had at least four interactions with the agent over the course of five days. We find that our platform is consistently rated higher for empathy, user engagement and usefulness than the simple rule-based framework. Finally, we provide guidelines to further improve the design and performance of the application, in accordance with the feedback received.

Mary Ogbuka Kenneth, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities. 2024.

Ruoyu Hu, Foaad Khosmood, Abbas Edalat. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI 2024). 2024.

Investors are interested in predicting future success of startup companies, preferably using publicly available data which can be gathered using free online sources. Using public-only data has been shown to work, but there is still much room for improvement. Two of the best performing prediction experiments use 17 and 49 features respectively, mostly numeric and categorical in nature. In this paper, we significantly expand and diversify both the sources and the number of features (to 171) to achieve better prediction. Data collected from Crunchbase, the Google Search API, and Twitter (now X) are used to predict whether a company will raise a round of funding within a fixed time horizon. Much of the new features are textual and the Twitter subset include linguistic metrics such as measures of passive voice and parts-of-speech. A total of ten machine learning models are also evaluated for best performance. The adaptable model can be used to predict funding 1-5 years into the future, with a variable cutoff threshold to favor either precision or recall. Prediction with comparable assumptions generally achieves F scores above 0.730 which outperforms previous attempts in the literature (0.531), and does so with fewer examples. Furthermore, we find that the vast majority of the performance impact comes from the top 18 of 171 features which are mostly generic company observations, including the best performing individual feature which is the free-form text description of the company.